Skip to main content

The Garbage President – after the Storm

A person masquerading with garbage
Overview

In the aftermath of the November 2024 presidential elections, a controversial candidate, along with his vice president emerged as winners. In no uncertain terms, the president-elect rebranded the country he’s to become the commander-in-chief as the United States of Garbage (USG). He declared that America was a “garbage country” plagued by internal enemies who posed a threat not only to the nation but to the entire world. According to him, the true danger lay within, not from external adversaries.

The old and newly elected president a.k.a the “garbage president” embraced this moniker, even going so far as to dress like a garbage man and drive a garbage truck. He proclaimed that America was the root cause of global conflicts, a statement that resonated with his supporters but drew widespread condemnation from others.

Adding to the controversy, the garbage president had a criminal past. He had been convicted of various crimes, including fraud and other misdemeanors. More gravely, he was found guilty of sexual assault and ordered to compensate the victim. Allegations also surfaced that he had stolen secret state documents upon leaving the office, but this is still pending in court.

Despite his awkward comments, curses directed at political opponents and anyone who disagreed with him, vulgar language, and indecent behavior, he emerged victorious. Strange, isn’t it? The best way to illustrate what happened is to use the analogy of plants.

The Plant Analogy

Imagine a once-thriving garden, now overrun with weeds and pests. The gardener, notorious for his neglect and poor practices, takes charge. He wears ragged clothes, symbolizing the garden’s decline, and uses broken tools to tend to the plants.

Instead of addressing the real issues, the gardener blames the garden’s state on the plants themselves, claiming that some are secretly sabotaging the growth of others. He insists that the garden’s problems are the reason for the blight affecting neighboring gardens.

To divert attention from his own failings, the gardener also starts blaming foreign plants and seeds for the garden’s woes. He claims that these foreign elements are invasive and harmful, spreading disease and disrupting the natural harmony of the garden. This rhetoric stirs fear and suspicion among the plants, leading them to distrust anything unfamiliar.

Despite his history of neglect and even being caught stealing seeds from other gardens, the gardener terrorizes the plants, and they succumbed to his calumnies. He uses his fearmongering skills and the plants’ desperation, anxiety and dread to his advantage, convincing them that he is their only hope.

The garbage Talks – an afterthought

Before, during, and perhaps even after the election, the narrative may either diminish or intensify. Regardless, the underlying theme and motive of such vulgar language, division tactics and image shaming remain clear to all and is understood by those who propagate them.

The narrative highlights extreme political polarization, where a leader’s derogatory rhetoric and criminal background are both condemned and celebrated. This division can lead to a fractured society, with deep mistrust between opposing factions.

Why the term “garbage” - a metaphor for "emptying." By focusing on internal enemies, the garbage president shifts attention away from external threats. This could imply a strategy to consolidate power by creating a common internal enemy, thereby uniting his base against perceived internal adversaries. This does not help build national unity. A kingdom divided against itself does not stand.

If a person describes his country as garbage; he becomes the president of such a garbage country. If he’s a convicted criminal; his criminal history raises questions about the moral and ethical standards of his leadership and his society.

If his people are willing to overlook his serious crimes for the sake of political allegiance, which can erode trust in public institutions; how would other countries’ criminal code look at him? Most countries’ penal codes do not allow convicts into their country. What a shameful thing if the garbage president is turned back at some countries’ ports of entries? Though probable, some people would be laughing at such a scene.

On a positive side, the use of “garbage” as a symbol reflects a profound sense of self-deprecation and critique. It could imply a narrative of self-destruction or a call for radical reform, depending on the perspective of the audience. Negatively, labeling America as the cause of global conflicts positions the country as a scapegoat on the international stage. This could lead to diplomatic isolation or increased scrutiny from other nations, affecting America’s foreign relations and global standing.

The president’s criminal convictions and alleged theft of state documents underscore the importance of legal and ethical accountability in governance. It raises concerns about the integrity of those in power and the potential consequences of their actions on national security.

If the number one person in a land is a criminal, is that the best the people can offer? Is he the only person able to cast the first stone? Is there a blurred line between right and wrong in that society? 

If the law excuses a criminal because he became the president, that is, a criminal presiding the affairs of the nation, what will the same law do if an ordinary citizen shoplifts? Will convicted persons now refuse to go to prison because the justice system has failed? What if judges, governors and probation officers decide to release prisoners from custody based on this singular act? 

It may sound foolish to some people. A leader’s past actions and ethical conduct significantly impact their credibility and the trust they inspire. Leaders should strive to maintain high ethical standards. Ignoring or excusing unethical behavior can lead to long-term damage and loss of respect.

Great Garbage Adventure

Leaders should work to unite their nation around a common goal, rather than creating divisions. A united group is more resilient and effective. Inspiring and motivating others through positive leadership can lead to greater loyalty and productivity.

Leaders must be willing to learn from their mistakes and adapt their strategies. Stagnation and refusal to change can lead to further decline. Encouraging a culture of continuous improvement helps nations thrive.

Just as a gardener should nurture all plants, leaders should support and develop every member of society, including those who did not vote for them. This fosters a positive environment and encourages growth. Understanding the needs and concerns of those you lead is essential for effective leadership.

Blaming immigrants or foreign elements for internal problems can lead to xenophobia and division. Leaders should promote fairness and inclusion, recognizing the value of diverse contributions. Trust is built through honesty and integrity, not through scapegoating and fearmongering.

By applying these lessons, the next four years could either be an opportunity to create a more positive, productive, and sustainable environment in America, or as the president-elect calls it, the United States of Garbage. Alternatively, we might witness the emergence of Europe as a formidable bloc with the Euro becoming the world’s leading trade currency. Additionally, this period could finally put BRICS on the map with its new currency vying for a position alongside the Euro.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who’s A Rebel? Camus’ The Rebel and the NigeriaSphere

In the contemporary Nigerian landscape, the word "rebel" is often weaponized by those in power. To the state, a rebel is a transgressor of the Cybercrimes Act, a "disturber of the peace," or an agent of destabilization. However, if we look through the eyes of Albert Camus, the 20th-century philosopher of the absurd, we find a different definition; one that validates the citizen’s cry for good governance not as an act of subversion, but as an act of profound affirmation. The Camusian "No": An Act of "Yes" Camus begins his treatise with a startlingly simple observation: "What is a rebel? A man who says no." But this "no" is not a denial of order. When a Nigerian citizen takes to social media to demand transparency or decry the absence of the rule of law, they are saying "no" to a specific limit that has been breached. Camus argues that in saying no, the rebel is simultaneously saying "yes" to the existen...

The Self-Alternating Theory: Why We Can Never Truly Be the Other

We live in a culture obsessed with the exercise of perspective-taking. We tell ourselves to "walk a mile in another person’s shoes," if our core self: our moral compass, our intellectual agility, our refined tastes, and our personal ethics remains intact during the journey. We imagine slipping into the lives of others like costume changes in a play: maintaining our internal "I" while operating the external machinery of someone else's life. The Self-Alternating Theory challenges this fundamental illusion. It posits a sobering premise: you cannot be the other, whether in their best or worst selves. If you were truly transplanted into another person’s existence: inheriting their exact neurobiology, trauma, muscle memory, history, and social incentives you would not reform their life from an enlightened, outside perspective. You would either collapse under the weight of an alien context or become the very thing you previously judged, admired, or misunderstood. ...

The Self-Alternating Theory (Part II): The Fractured Mirror of Context

In the first iteration of the Self-Alternating Theory, we dismantled the illusion of portable identity. We demonstrated that if you were transplanted into the life of a failed leader, a sex worker, a saint, or an elite athlete, you would not reform or master their world from an enlightened external perspective. You would either crumble under the weight of an alien context or absorb their exact trajectory. Part II extends this radical lens across the fundamental fault lines of human experience: relationships, race, geopolitics, physical embodiment, and the outer boundaries of species existence.                        The underlying principle remains absolute: we do not take our intact "I" into another person's reality. The reality reshapes, overwrites, or breaks the "I." Relational Systems: The Model Partner vs. The Toxic Household We routinely look at fractured marriages...

Names, Visions, and Imageries of the Crow tribe of Native Americans

Table of Contents The Crow: Who are they? Names, Visions, and Imageries Apsaalooke (or Absaroka) The Separations of the Bands The Mountain Crow (Ashalaho) The River Crow The Kicked in the Bellies Chiefs, Their Names and Meanings Chief Long Hair (Issheuhutskitu) Chief Sore Belly (Arapoosh) Chief of the Camp (Ashbacheeitche) Chief of Plenty Coups The rich cultural heritage of the Native Americans is subject to different interpretations beyond the actual meanings as understood by the natives. The Crow tribe’s names, visions, and imageries are not spared from these relative interpretations. It is claimed that these names, visions, and imageries denote exaggerations, triumphalism, or cultural symbolism. Also, their name can visually reveal the true meanings of descriptive language and metaphors or similes in words and expressions.   The objective of this writing is to examine these names and imageries to differentiate the Europeans’ interpretations of the names and lifestyle of the Cr...

Accessibility: from Philosophical Perspectives

Introduction This article aims to examine the concept of accessibility from some philosophical principles: Utilitarianism and the principle of ‘one and many.’ Doing this will bring to the fore the reason why accessibility is the cynosure of inclusivity. Understanding Accessibility Accessibility refers to the design of products, devices, services, or environments that are usable for everyone. It ensures that everyone, regardless of their abilities or limitations, can effectively interact with and benefit from a product, technology, environment, or service. The term ‘accessibility’ has its origin in French. It can be said to be borrowed from the French “ accessibilite ,” meaning “the quality of being able to be reached or accessed.” This French term might have been influenced by the late Latin accessibilis , from Latin accessus (past participle of accēdere , meaning “to approach”, “to enter”, “to access”, or “to log in.” According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, the ...