Skip to main content

Names, Visions, and Imageries of the Crow tribe of Native Americans


Table of Contents

The rich cultural heritage of the Native Americans is subject to different interpretations beyond the actual meanings as understood by the natives. The Crow tribe’s names, visions, and imageries are not spared from these relative interpretations. It is claimed that these names, visions, and imageries denote exaggerations, triumphalism, or cultural symbolism. Also, their name can visually reveal the true meanings of descriptive language and metaphors or similes in words and expressions.  

The objective of this writing is to examine these names and imageries to differentiate the Europeans’ interpretations of the names and lifestyle of the Crow nation from the Crow’s presentations of who they are and their way of life.

It will bring out the significance of the Crow’s culture by examining their names, titles, and bands.

The Crow: Who are they?

The Crow is a Native American tribe. Before the advent of the Europeans, the Crow occupied the entire Yellowstone River and the Northern Plains of Montana and Wyoming. The Crow is a collection of different bands of natives with one ancestry and homeland.

The Crow and the Hidatsa were kin and speak the same language that was part of the Missouri valley Siouan language. About the 15th century, the Europeans and the Americans increased their activities in the area. The Sioux pushed the Crow out of their land. That led to the Crow separating themselves from their kin, Hidatsa. This further led to subdivisions of the tribe into the Mountain Crow, the River Crow, and the Kicked in the Bellies, who later carved themselves out from the Mountain Crow.

Names, Visions, and Imageries

With this brief description of who the Crow is, below are a variety of names and imageries associated with the Crow. Efforts will be made to understand them according to the minds of the natives to put to the fore their meanings and significance.

Apsaalooke (or Absaroka)

The Crow calls themselves Apsaalooke or Absaroka, meaning “people of the large-beaked bird” or the “bird people.” This name is exemplified in their attire, where in their sacred ceremonies, the Crow decorates themselves with dead birds hanging on their heads. However, the early French explorers misinterpreted the name “Apsaalooke” to mean “gens de corbeaux,” that is, “people of the crows.”  

The early contact between the French and the Crow introduced a simultaneous and hermeneutical understanding of each other as well as health issues associated with migration.

The French explorers called the Crow “beaux hommes”, that is, “handsome men.” The Crow called the French explorers “Baashchille” which is a “person with white eyes.” We can see the power of figurative uses of language in the instances of “handsome men” and “person with white eyes.”

Writing about white eyes, it is said that William Prescott, an American officer who, at the battle of Bunker Hill during the Revolutionary War, instructed his troops: “don’t fire until you see the whites of their eyes.” Though the above saying was associated with the Bunker Hill battle of 1775 between the British and the Americans, the Crow referring to the French as a person with white eyes may have a different meaning. The comparison between the Crow’s use of the phrase “person with white eyes” and William Prescott’s saying show some similarities in content but not in context.

As the Crow and French explorers exchanged pleasantries and acknowledged their differences, the encounter saw the introduction of smallpox epidemics that decimated the Crow population.

The Separations of the Bands

As stated above, the Crow was a collection of different bands who were united and held together not only by name but also by language, though with different dialects and homelands. Examining the bands will help throw some light on the names and reasons for the separation.

The Mountain Crow (Ashalaho)

The Mountain Crow was said to separate from the Hidatsa kin because their leader, who was known as “No Intestines.” He had a vision that made him lead his people in search of the Sacred Tobacco. The move led to their occupying the valley of the Yellowstone River that stretched to the Northern Plains in Montana and Wyoming.

The River Crow

After the Mountain Crow left Hidatsa, the River Crow left too because of a dispute over a “bison stomach.” They settled along the Yellowstone River and Musselshell River.

The Kicked in the Bellies

The Kicked in the Bellies within the Mountain Crow decided and separated from the band. They moved from the Big Horn mountains to the Wind River Range in central Wyoming.

When the Crow bands left Hidatsa, the Hidatsa occupied the Missouri River area with the Mandan and flourished as agrarians.

Something constant among the different Crow bands was that they all linked their way of life to the bison. The names, such as “No Intestines,” “the dispute over the content of a bison stomach,” and “Kicked in the Bellies” symbolize the importance of the creature, ‘bison’ in their culture. More so, the bison was regarded as their food source, and its stomach contents were viewed as delicacies.

Chiefs, Their Names and Meanings

We see the power and use of language. Imagine a leader of the Mountain Crow being addressed as “No Intestines” and the “Kicked in the Bellies” answering that. Below are a few other names of some leaders or chiefs of the Crow.

Chief Long Hair (Issheuhutskitu)

The Crow term “Itchuuwaaooshbishish” means “Red Plume Feather at the Temple.” Chief Long Hair, or “Issheuhutskitu” was born in 1750. He was called Chief Long Hair because he had long hair that measured 10-25 feet long at various times in his life.

Chief Sore Belly (Arapoosh)

He was chief of River Crow around the first half of the 19th century. According to legend, as he fasted, he saw a vision that he had received a shield that would become a symbol of spiritual protection and prophecy.

Chief of the Camp (Ashbacheeitche)

He was a dealing-making chief. He held the title of the band of chiefs of the whole Mountain Crow band. He was a medicine man under whose purview the 1825 “Treaty of Friendship” was signed with the United States at Mandan village and was witnessed by 15 other Mountain Crow chiefs.

Chief of Plenty Coups

The name of this chief is an interesting one. His name sounded like either his accomplishments or genius. The term “coup” is understood as its dictionary meaning suggests. According to the dictionary definition of a coup, it is “a sudden violent and unlawful seizure of power from a government especially through military manoeuvres.” It also means “an example of successfully achieving something difficult.”

Plenty Coups is an appropriate phrase that better describes Chief Plenty Coups. He was faced with the mighty power of the Europeans and the Americans. For sure, he knew that their lands would soon be in the hands of foreign settlers; his astuteness and boyhood vision helped him navigate through those hardships and bought for his people a resettlement that was very close to their natural homelands in Montana.

As a young boy, he saw the appearance and disappearance of buffalo on the Plains, and later the buffalo was replaced by other breeds. Again, he saw a vision where the wind blew every tree down, but one tree was left standing. He interpreted the vision to mean that the white man would take their lands away from them as well as their way of life. As a result, he enjoined his people to assist the Americans during the Indian Wars so that when the war was over, they were spared and compensated for being good allies.

From the above, the Crow can be said to have a powerful language that allows them to speak in idioms, imageries, and context. Their names, visions, and imageries are part of who they are and the means of communicating among themselves.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who’s A Rebel? Camus’ The Rebel and the NigeriaSphere

In the contemporary Nigerian landscape, the word "rebel" is often weaponized by those in power. To the state, a rebel is a transgressor of the Cybercrimes Act, a "disturber of the peace," or an agent of destabilization. However, if we look through the eyes of Albert Camus, the 20th-century philosopher of the absurd, we find a different definition; one that validates the citizen’s cry for good governance not as an act of subversion, but as an act of profound affirmation. The Camusian "No": An Act of "Yes" Camus begins his treatise with a startlingly simple observation: "What is a rebel? A man who says no." But this "no" is not a denial of order. When a Nigerian citizen takes to social media to demand transparency or decry the absence of the rule of law, they are saying "no" to a specific limit that has been breached. Camus argues that in saying no, the rebel is simultaneously saying "yes" to the existen...

The Self-Alternating Theory (Part II): The Fractured Mirror of Context

In the first iteration of the Self-Alternating Theory, we dismantled the illusion of portable identity. We demonstrated that if you were transplanted into the life of a failed leader, a sex worker, a saint, or an elite athlete, you would not reform or master their world from an enlightened external perspective. You would either crumble under the weight of an alien context or absorb their exact trajectory. Part II extends this radical lens across the fundamental fault lines of human experience: relationships, race, geopolitics, physical embodiment, and the outer boundaries of species existence.                        The underlying principle remains absolute: we do not take our intact "I" into another person's reality. The reality reshapes, overwrites, or breaks the "I." Relational Systems: The Model Partner vs. The Toxic Household We routinely look at fractured marriages...

The Self-Alternating Theory: Why We Can Never Truly Be the Other

We live in a culture obsessed with the exercise of perspective-taking. We tell ourselves to "walk a mile in another person’s shoes," if our core self: our moral compass, our intellectual agility, our refined tastes, and our personal ethics remains intact during the journey. We imagine slipping into the lives of others like costume changes in a play: maintaining our internal "I" while operating the external machinery of someone else's life. The Self-Alternating Theory challenges this fundamental illusion. It posits a sobering premise: you cannot be the other, whether in their best or worst selves. If you were truly transplanted into another person’s existence: inheriting their exact neurobiology, trauma, muscle memory, history, and social incentives you would not reform their life from an enlightened, outside perspective. You would either collapse under the weight of an alien context or become the very thing you previously judged, admired, or misunderstood. ...

Accessibility: from Philosophical Perspectives

Introduction This article aims to examine the concept of accessibility from some philosophical principles: Utilitarianism and the principle of ‘one and many.’ Doing this will bring to the fore the reason why accessibility is the cynosure of inclusivity. Understanding Accessibility Accessibility refers to the design of products, devices, services, or environments that are usable for everyone. It ensures that everyone, regardless of their abilities or limitations, can effectively interact with and benefit from a product, technology, environment, or service. The term ‘accessibility’ has its origin in French. It can be said to be borrowed from the French “ accessibilite ,” meaning “the quality of being able to be reached or accessed.” This French term might have been influenced by the late Latin accessibilis , from Latin accessus (past participle of accēdere , meaning “to approach”, “to enter”, “to access”, or “to log in.” According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, the ...