Table of Contents
Not too long ago, the media were awash with news and commentaries about
how the US Supreme Court ruled against the Bill of Affirmative Action on the
basis that it was discriminatory because it was against the fundamental
principles of equality under the law.
This essay aims to review the concept of Affirmative Action and its correlations
and attempt to imagine a society where Uncle Sam’s Merit Machine is hoisted as
the only mechanism of selection to any university, employment, the appointment
of judges to any court, or even the supreme court and any decision affecting
the people.
What is Affirmative Action?
In the United States, it is a conscious effort by the state, government,
and voluntary private programs to improve employment, educational, and federal
government appointments to include members of groups who have historically been
discriminated against because of their race or gender. The criteria for this affirmative
action are based on these characteristics: age, disability, ethnicity, gender,
race, and sexual orientation.
The above are offshoots of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which prohibits
discrimination because of colour, ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, and gender
identity in employment, federal funding, public education, public
accommodation, the jury system, race, religion, and so on.
Affirmative action has different names and meaning for different
countries. In the UK, it is known as ‘protected characteristics.’ But it has a
different meaning in the UK Equality Act 2010. The law protects people against
discrimination, harassment, victimization, or bullying in the workplace when seeking
employment or admission to any private or public services. They are known as
the nine protected characteristics: Age, disability, gender reassignment,
marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or
belief, sex, and sexual orientation.
In the United States, the first form of affirmative action was seen in
the Wagner Act of 1935, when workers were given the right to form and join
unions.
However, under the leadership of President Lyndon Johnson, affirmative
action was established to improve opportunities for African Americans as one of
the ways of tearing down the walls of discrimination and breaking the code of
colour bar.
Ever since critics of this system have not ceased to argue against it as
being unfair and a type of reverse discrimination. Some have argued that it
would lead to the hiring of less qualified people and admitting unqualified
students into universities.
The Equal Protection Clause
One of the arguments against affirmative action is that it promotes what
is referred to as reverse discrimination, which is treating members of majority
groups unfairly because of the policies made law to protect members of minority
groups. Policies that are often deemed preferential treatment.
When the US supreme court decided on the affirmative action cases from
Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC), the court argued
that the various programs violated the Equal Protection Clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment and as such, they ruled against affirmative action in both
cases.
As a nation of laws, the US takes seriously the letters and perhaps, the
spirit of the constitution. The clause which came into effect in 1868 states
that: “nor shall any State … deny to any person within its jurisdiction the
equal protection of the laws.”
The question to ask at this point is: Is the equal protection clause
argument universal? Because there can be other nuances of affirmative action in
the same institutions that can be viewed as a type of cultural chauvinism.
University Scholarship Programs
We understand scholarship awards as grants paid by either an
organization, state or federal government, or private citizens to support
students in education, and these awards are made because of the student’s
academic excellence or other achievements. In most cases, these scholarships
are conditionally set not on academic merits but because of a student’s
national origin, gender, or even continent.
In some other instances, scholarships are awarded to some students
because of their performance in sports, music, or even cheerleading.
The most atypical award at times is made because of a student’s privileged
position. The student is admitted to an A-list university because of the
numerous donations by their father or mother to the university.
The Equal Protection Clause does not sanction ableism. One can argue
that some scholarship programs of some universities tend to discriminate
against the out-group members. A scholarship that is meant for students from Asia
or Europe or Africa, any student from outside these continents is discriminated
against. A scholarship that is meant for cheerleaders or football heroes, any
student who is not a cheerleader or footballer is discriminated against. A
student is admitted to an A-list university because their father or mother made
several donations to the university, any student whose parent cannot and does
not donate to the university is not admitted to the university notwithstanding their
academic excellence. This is a kind of indirect purchase of a place at a
university.
Negative Action
There are even more serious problems that tingle the ears when it comes
to discrimination because of ableism. A few years back, it was on the news how
celebrity parents were purchasing university places for their children. They
bought places for their children in A-list universities, places they would not
have secured because they did not merit them. This is discrimination against
the poor who otherwise qualified for the places at the same university but are
not given the opportunity because the highest bidder has closed the list.
Negative action does not end with parents purchasing university places
for their children. Some students have gained admission into A-list universities
because the professors or vice-chancellors are blackmailed.
As humans, we are not perfect. At most, we want to be seen as truthful
and honest in all we do and at least, we shun lies, hypocrisies, and double
standards. How can we maintain and live up to the claim that we are all equal
before the law?
Uncle Sam’s Merit Machine
I will propose a machine that is capable of selection based on
excellence, merit, and qualifications. This imagined machine is what I call
Uncle Sam’s Merit Machine.
This machine is configured in such a way that it is colour-blind, age-blind,
language-blind, belief-blind, disability-blind, sex-blind, gender-blind,
race-blind, and sexual orientation-blind. Uncle Sam’s Merit Machine has been
ingesting data of all types, shapes, and colours for the past 20 years.
When a position is open for example, the position of a bank manager in bank
A, interested candidates will apply and send their applications to Uncle Sam’s
Merit Machine. Once it receives the applications, it will cut off every
personally identifiable information from the application and generate a number identifiable
to the application and applicant and send it to the applicant. The machine will
process all the applications and produce at least three best candidates for the
position based on their merits.
The same machine has a section for interviewing the selected candidates.
It will issue invitations to the candidates based on their identifiable numbers
for an interview. It will interview candidates following the selection process
based on job and personal specifications and pick out one candidate from the
three. Uncle Sam’s Merit Machine has no human intervention and thus runs
objectively.
In this imagined Uncle Sam’s Merit Machine, what do you think will happen
in different workplaces, congress, supreme court judges, and other judges’ appointments?
The machine will select the best qualified, the best judge, the best congressmen,
and women, and the best people running the country.
Because of the competence of Uncle Sam’s Merit Machine, judicial biases
are removed from the judicial systems, the morons are no longer elected to office
as congressmen/women or presidents, and swindlers and looters are no longer
selected or appointed as managers of banks or ministries. The society is stable
because there won’t be careless or ill-thought legislation, and financial
crises will be things of the past because banks have the best-intentioned
people running them; there will be fewer riots and demonstrations on the
streets because the decisions that affect the people are the correct and
consultative ones. Miscarriage of justice will be no more because only those
who truly commit crimes are put in jail, no more unjust convictions. The
universities will be very diverse because they followed Uncle Sam’s Merit
Machine selection for the admission process.
With Uncle Sam’s Merit Machine, affirmative or negative action will be things of the past and the true meaning of equality under the law will be enacted by the machine.
Comments