Skip to main content

Flat Pipe: Arapaho Creation Myth


Table of Contents

The Arapaho are a Native American people. According to scholars, their presence was first noticed circa 3,000 years ago in the western region of the Great Lakes, along the Red River Valley, which could be now Manitoba in Canada, and Minnesota in the United States. They were popularly agrarians and spoke the Arapahoe language. My main interest is in their understanding of how things came into being. That is, how the Flat Pipe creates in the Arapaho tradition.  

Many different creation hypotheses are closely related to the ‘earth-diver’ creation myth. Examining a few of these will help us better understand the Arapaho creation hypothesis.

Creation Hypotheses and Earth-Diver Myths

The creation hypothesis is the claim that one being, or more supernatural beings or gods created the natural world. Earth-diver myths emphasize that a powerful being or group of spirits sends a bird or animal into the waters to see if there is earth or mud on which to build living homes for humankind. Briefly, some of the creation hypotheses and earth-diver myths will be examined below.

Creation from nothing and the Dove’s Olive leaf in Judeo-Christian Traditions

In both Judaic and Christian religious beliefs, the story about how the universe came into being is two-fold as recorded in Genesis chapters 1 and 2. In the first account, God creates ex nihilo, and by just saying the ‘word’; the heavens and the earth are created in six days, and he rests on the seventh day. In the second account, God creates the first man, Adam from the dust of the earth. Believing that it is not proper for Adam to be alone, he creates the first woman, Eve from Adam’s ribs while he sleeps. In this account, the first man appears to have been created from something that already exists, that is, the dust of the earth.

Again, the story of the Great Flood in the book of Genesis chapter 7 destroyed the whole world of which only Noah, his household, and seven pairs of clean and unclean animals, birds of the air, etc., were spared of the deluge. After 40 days, Noah wanted to find out if the flood had subsided; he first sent out the bird raven and it moved to and fro until the waters dried up the earth.

He sent out the dove from the ark and it did not find a place to perch because the waters were still on the surface of the earth. It came back to the ark. After seven days, he sent out the dove again. The dove returned to Noah in the evening with an olive leaf on its beak. Finally, he sent out the dove the third time and it did not return to the ark. That informed Noah that the waters had subsided, and he opened the ark.

The mating of Earth Mother and Sky Father in A’shiwi Tribe’s Creation Account.

The A’shiwi people, also known as ‘Zuni’ practice shamanism that is closely intertwined with their traditional dances, and ceremonies associated with mythologies. In their creation myth, the earth mother slept with the sky father while upon the waters and they conceived and gave birth to everything in the world. As the children of Earth’s mother increased, perhaps, she needed more space. As a result, the earth mother pushed the sky father away and he went up to the sky. Then, the earth's mother began to sink into the deep waters. She saw a bowl filled with water nearby and she thought that each place should be surrounded by mountains like the edge of the bowl. She then spat on the water and foams were formed.

Arapaho Creation Myth

In their account, Flat Pipe is a being who exists on its own and dwells upon the waters. But Flat Pipe seemed to exist alongside the Great Spirit who made suggestions on how things should be. The Great Spirit suggested that creatures should be created to build the world. In his wisdom, Flat Pipe created ducks and other water birds, and they went into the deep but the deep was bottomless. They could not find land as they sunk deeper and deeper.

Again, the Great Spirit suggested that the Turtle be created that can dwell on both the waters and land. The Turtle went into the deep waters and returned with mud. The Turtle spat out a piece of land which turned into earth. Flat Pipe progressed to creating all things that filled the earth.

The Great Spirit suggested to Flat Pipe what was possible, such as creating creatures and in particular the Turtle that would create the earth. Analogically, we can see the same consultation in the Judeo-Christian creation account where God said: “let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness…” (Genesis 1:26). This can be viewed as both consultation or invitation and suggestion.

In the Arapaho creation myth, three beings seem agreeably involved: The Great Spirit, who offers suggestions, Flat Pile who creates and Turtle who extends Flat Pile’s creative power. In some Algonquian traditions, the Turtle is described as a base or solid foundation holding the entire earth’s structure, hence the earth rests on its back.

A better description of the Arapaho creation myth can be found in Andy Cowell of the University of Colorado narrative. Based on George Dorsey’s account of the Arapaho creation myth of 1903.

A great flood covered the space and a man carrying a Flat Pipe, weeping, and fasting as he walked around on the water for six days in search of a safe place for it. By the seventh day, when no place was found, he saw the need for the earth to place the Pipe. Now what he did next was so important. He beckoned people from every direction to help find land for the Pipe. Yet there was no dry land, the same man invited the seven cottonwood trees and invoked birds of the air and creatures that live in waters. Among the animals that answered the call was the Turtle, who informed him that land is at the bottom of the waters.

Diving into the Bottom of the Waters

The man then challenged the birds and animals to dive into the deep to find land. It was not a simple challenge. And the creatures dive into the waters in successions: the Grebe went first and failed. Then two waterfowl followed but they too failed. Since two couldn’t make it, maybe three would. Three waterfowl dived in but failed. Otter, Beaver, Packed Bird, and Garter Snake tried but did not make it. A contingent of a black snake, two ducks, a goose, and a crane dived, but they too did not make it.

On the seventh round, the Turtle decided it was his time. But before diving into the deep waters, the man was to join. He performed some rituals by lifting the Flat Pipe four times and touching his body with it five times. The Flat Pipe changes into a Red-headed duck and follows the man and the Turtle down into the waters. Finally, the Turtle and the Red-headed duck were the only creatures that brought mud for the man who placed them in every direction and created the earth.

Conclusion

There are quite some similarities among the different creation hypotheses. The Judeo-Christian creation account presents God as creating the world from nothing, in one sense but in another sense, it claims that God created the first man, Adam from the dust of the earth. It may mean that God created Adam from Adamah, that is, human from humus, as the two Hebrew words denote. This can be viewed as God defining humankind as dust to which they shall return when his breath of life is taken away from them.

The mating of the Earth Mother and the Sky Father upon the waters in the A’shiwi Tribe’s creation mythology eventually led to the creation of the Earth.

Another interesting fact is that after the Great Flood, Noah sent out the dove to survey the earth for dry land. In a different way but of the same significance, the man, in the Arapaho creation myth sought the help of different creatures to dive into the deep waters to find land.

Flat Pipe, in the Arapaho creation myth, can be said to be a great force, that put the birds and animals to test in finding land by diving into the deep waters. 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who’s A Rebel? Camus’ The Rebel and the NigeriaSphere

In the contemporary Nigerian landscape, the word "rebel" is often weaponized by those in power. To the state, a rebel is a transgressor of the Cybercrimes Act, a "disturber of the peace," or an agent of destabilization. However, if we look through the eyes of Albert Camus, the 20th-century philosopher of the absurd, we find a different definition; one that validates the citizen’s cry for good governance not as an act of subversion, but as an act of profound affirmation. The Camusian "No": An Act of "Yes" Camus begins his treatise with a startlingly simple observation: "What is a rebel? A man who says no." But this "no" is not a denial of order. When a Nigerian citizen takes to social media to demand transparency or decry the absence of the rule of law, they are saying "no" to a specific limit that has been breached. Camus argues that in saying no, the rebel is simultaneously saying "yes" to the existen...

The Self-Alternating Theory: Why We Can Never Truly Be the Other

We live in a culture obsessed with the exercise of perspective-taking. We tell ourselves to "walk a mile in another person’s shoes," if our core self: our moral compass, our intellectual agility, our refined tastes, and our personal ethics remains intact during the journey. We imagine slipping into the lives of others like costume changes in a play: maintaining our internal "I" while operating the external machinery of someone else's life. The Self-Alternating Theory challenges this fundamental illusion. It posits a sobering premise: you cannot be the other, whether in their best or worst selves. If you were truly transplanted into another person’s existence: inheriting their exact neurobiology, trauma, muscle memory, history, and social incentives you would not reform their life from an enlightened, outside perspective. You would either collapse under the weight of an alien context or become the very thing you previously judged, admired, or misunderstood. ...

The Self-Alternating Theory (Part II): The Fractured Mirror of Context

In the first iteration of the Self-Alternating Theory, we dismantled the illusion of portable identity. We demonstrated that if you were transplanted into the life of a failed leader, a sex worker, a saint, or an elite athlete, you would not reform or master their world from an enlightened external perspective. You would either crumble under the weight of an alien context or absorb their exact trajectory. Part II extends this radical lens across the fundamental fault lines of human experience: relationships, race, geopolitics, physical embodiment, and the outer boundaries of species existence.                        The underlying principle remains absolute: we do not take our intact "I" into another person's reality. The reality reshapes, overwrites, or breaks the "I." Relational Systems: The Model Partner vs. The Toxic Household We routinely look at fractured marriages...

Names, Visions, and Imageries of the Crow tribe of Native Americans

Table of Contents The Crow: Who are they? Names, Visions, and Imageries Apsaalooke (or Absaroka) The Separations of the Bands The Mountain Crow (Ashalaho) The River Crow The Kicked in the Bellies Chiefs, Their Names and Meanings Chief Long Hair (Issheuhutskitu) Chief Sore Belly (Arapoosh) Chief of the Camp (Ashbacheeitche) Chief of Plenty Coups The rich cultural heritage of the Native Americans is subject to different interpretations beyond the actual meanings as understood by the natives. The Crow tribe’s names, visions, and imageries are not spared from these relative interpretations. It is claimed that these names, visions, and imageries denote exaggerations, triumphalism, or cultural symbolism. Also, their name can visually reveal the true meanings of descriptive language and metaphors or similes in words and expressions.   The objective of this writing is to examine these names and imageries to differentiate the Europeans’ interpretations of the names and lifestyle of the Cr...

Accessibility: from Philosophical Perspectives

Introduction This article aims to examine the concept of accessibility from some philosophical principles: Utilitarianism and the principle of ‘one and many.’ Doing this will bring to the fore the reason why accessibility is the cynosure of inclusivity. Understanding Accessibility Accessibility refers to the design of products, devices, services, or environments that are usable for everyone. It ensures that everyone, regardless of their abilities or limitations, can effectively interact with and benefit from a product, technology, environment, or service. The term ‘accessibility’ has its origin in French. It can be said to be borrowed from the French “ accessibilite ,” meaning “the quality of being able to be reached or accessed.” This French term might have been influenced by the late Latin accessibilis , from Latin accessus (past participle of accēdere , meaning “to approach”, “to enter”, “to access”, or “to log in.” According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, the ...