Skip to main content

Myth and Legends: Baba Yaga & Lysistrata

I was reading the famous play known as Lysistrata by Aristophanes when my friend appeared on a WhatsApp call. Her hair was unkempt.

            ‘What happened to your hair?’ I inquired.

            ‘I’m like Baba Yaga.’ She spoke.

            ‘Who’s Baba Yaga?’ I asked.

Then, she began to tell me the legend of this Slavic folklore. According to her, Baba Yaga is considered a superhuman creature with many attributes, of course ensconced by humans. Baba relishes the human adulations of her power and enigma. Baba Yaga has other three sisters who are also called Baba Yaga. In appearance, she appears misshapen and has bony legs and a nose that sticks out. She could be seen accessorized with a mortar and a pestle. She separated herself from humans and dwelled in the deep forest in a hut that stood on chicken legs.

Being a puzzle to the entire Slavic People, she has been variously described as having many sides. Some could view her as Death, a totem, Bird, or Earth-goddess, others could also view her as Moon, Winter, a female initiator, phallic mother, or a certain kind of being who could exhibit some nefarious behaviors. Baba Yaga could also be helpful to humans as noted below.

My friend said to me that Baba Yaga means different things in different Eastern European languages. Baba’s meanings could range from a midwife, sorceress, grandmother, or old woman to an old, foolish, smelly, and dirty woman. The latter description is very disapproving of her. The term ‘baba’ could be used to disapprove and describe a man without a spine or a person of effete tendencies. Then, the term ‘Yaga’ also is not without some problems in the interpretation of meaning and usage. Among many Eastern European cultures, there is no common agreement as to what ‘Yaga’ means. It has been variously understood as horror, shudder, anger, witch, evil woman, or even a disease.

As I listen with interest, I begin to draw some comparisons between the story of Baba Yaga and Lysistrata. Then, she excused herself and went to the kitchen and made herself a cup of coffee.

            ‘There’s a typical folklore associated with Baba Yaga.’ She spoke as she settled her cup of coffee on the table.

            ‘I would love to hear it.’ I beckoned.

This story was told by Alexander Afanasyev in The Maiden Tsar. It was about the visit of Ivan, a gentle and handsome son of a merchant, who visited one of the three Baba Yagas in her chicken-leg hut. As legend has it, the moment she saw him, she was outraged and said: ‘From their hut deep in the forest, they could not hear or see the Russian smell, but the smell is everywhere in this hut.’ She asked Ivan whether he visited on his own accord or was forced to do so. In reply, he was a bit ambiguous. He said that he was both of his own accord and compelled to do so. Then, Ivan posed a question to Baba Yaga. Do you know the location of the three-tenth kingdom? She answered that she did not know but told him to consult her second sister for an answer.

Ivan went to the second Baba Yaga and posed the same question. But the second sister did not know either. She directed him to consult the third sister. However, she advised him that if her sister became angry at him and was about to eat him ask for three horns and with her permission blow them in a form of symphonic order: first horn – softly, second horn – louder, and third horn – more loudly.

Finally, Ivan met the third sister, who was the youngest. She asked him the same question that was asked by the first sister and immediately wanted to eat Ivan. He nervously requested three horns. He blew the horns in symphonic order as described above. The sound from the horns attracted different kinds of birds and they filled the hut. Among the birds was a firebird, which whisked Ivan away as he hopped on its back. He was saved from the Baba Yaga’s claws of death by a firebird.

            ‘That’s the end of my story about Baba Yaga.’ She spoke.

            ‘Excellent!’ I spoke. It was both interesting and informative.

            ‘Now, tell me what you’re reading before I appear like a Baba Yaga.’ She asked.

I picked up the book and cleared my throat.

            ‘I will only give you a summary.’ I advised.

Lysistrata is a drama by Aristophanes that painted a picture of how the Athenian women wanted to end the Peloponnesian War. The Athenian women were led by a woman whose name was Lysistrata. They planned to occupy the Acropolis, starve the city of a source of income to fund the war, and force their husbands to make peace by denying them sex.

They started the campaign in good faith but halfway through, the burden of missing sex and the desire to have sex with their husbands was becoming so unbearable that some of them contemplated reneging on their oath. But Lysistrata held her grounds and reasons with Myrrhine to seduce her husband, Cinesias but leave him at the climax of sexual feelings.  

The way Athenian women felt was not different from the Spartan women. Lysistrata had a consultation with the Athenian magistrate, and they agreed to a quick peace talk. The peace talk resulted in the embracing and kissing of 12 old men (the first semichorus) and 12 old women (the second semichorus), which marked the reconciliation of the two semichoruses.

Finally, to concretize the reconciliation pact, Lysistrata brought a delegate from Sparta, whose name was Lampito (reconciliation). She was young and elegant. Her beauty dazzled and nobody took their eyes off her. Under her charm, the delegates signed the peace declaration.

            ‘That’s interesting.’ She spoke.

            ‘One more thing,’ I noted. Lysistrata means ‘She who breaks up armies.’

The above stories tell us these: Two different characters, one a creation of an artist’s imagination and the other, a Slavic myth. One on the advocacy of peace and structures of conflict resolution, the other in humble admission of their limited knowledge even though they have been ascribed supernatural powers by humans.

The current war going on between Russia and Ukraine could be averted if men would listen to women. Many women are mothers, and no loving mother will sanction war instead of peace. Men approve of wars because they have no feelings, too egotistic, self-obsessed, inhumane, boastful, and unemotional. I think if more and more women become leaders of nations, the world might know more peace than the marginal peace the world has known. 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who’s A Rebel? Camus’ The Rebel and the NigeriaSphere

In the contemporary Nigerian landscape, the word "rebel" is often weaponized by those in power. To the state, a rebel is a transgressor of the Cybercrimes Act, a "disturber of the peace," or an agent of destabilization. However, if we look through the eyes of Albert Camus, the 20th-century philosopher of the absurd, we find a different definition; one that validates the citizen’s cry for good governance not as an act of subversion, but as an act of profound affirmation. The Camusian "No": An Act of "Yes" Camus begins his treatise with a startlingly simple observation: "What is a rebel? A man who says no." But this "no" is not a denial of order. When a Nigerian citizen takes to social media to demand transparency or decry the absence of the rule of law, they are saying "no" to a specific limit that has been breached. Camus argues that in saying no, the rebel is simultaneously saying "yes" to the existen...

The Self-Alternating Theory: Why We Can Never Truly Be the Other

We live in a culture obsessed with the exercise of perspective-taking. We tell ourselves to "walk a mile in another person’s shoes," if our core self: our moral compass, our intellectual agility, our refined tastes, and our personal ethics remains intact during the journey. We imagine slipping into the lives of others like costume changes in a play: maintaining our internal "I" while operating the external machinery of someone else's life. The Self-Alternating Theory challenges this fundamental illusion. It posits a sobering premise: you cannot be the other, whether in their best or worst selves. If you were truly transplanted into another person’s existence: inheriting their exact neurobiology, trauma, muscle memory, history, and social incentives you would not reform their life from an enlightened, outside perspective. You would either collapse under the weight of an alien context or become the very thing you previously judged, admired, or misunderstood. ...

The Self-Alternating Theory (Part II): The Fractured Mirror of Context

In the first iteration of the Self-Alternating Theory, we dismantled the illusion of portable identity. We demonstrated that if you were transplanted into the life of a failed leader, a sex worker, a saint, or an elite athlete, you would not reform or master their world from an enlightened external perspective. You would either crumble under the weight of an alien context or absorb their exact trajectory. Part II extends this radical lens across the fundamental fault lines of human experience: relationships, race, geopolitics, physical embodiment, and the outer boundaries of species existence.                        The underlying principle remains absolute: we do not take our intact "I" into another person's reality. The reality reshapes, overwrites, or breaks the "I." Relational Systems: The Model Partner vs. The Toxic Household We routinely look at fractured marriages...

Names, Visions, and Imageries of the Crow tribe of Native Americans

Table of Contents The Crow: Who are they? Names, Visions, and Imageries Apsaalooke (or Absaroka) The Separations of the Bands The Mountain Crow (Ashalaho) The River Crow The Kicked in the Bellies Chiefs, Their Names and Meanings Chief Long Hair (Issheuhutskitu) Chief Sore Belly (Arapoosh) Chief of the Camp (Ashbacheeitche) Chief of Plenty Coups The rich cultural heritage of the Native Americans is subject to different interpretations beyond the actual meanings as understood by the natives. The Crow tribe’s names, visions, and imageries are not spared from these relative interpretations. It is claimed that these names, visions, and imageries denote exaggerations, triumphalism, or cultural symbolism. Also, their name can visually reveal the true meanings of descriptive language and metaphors or similes in words and expressions.   The objective of this writing is to examine these names and imageries to differentiate the Europeans’ interpretations of the names and lifestyle of the Cr...

The stories of how Jesus was conceived as narrated in the Qur’an and Bible

Table of Contents Revelations or Representation?  The Mary Question   The Qur'an The Bible Today, I have chosen the eve of Christmas to write about how Jesus was conceived as narrated in the Qur’an and the Bible. Doing this, I intend to infer Mary’s role as the ark who delivered the child to the world. I must declare at this point that this is not an academic paper, even though I pose the question: Revelations or representation? Revelations or Representation?  Some scriptural scholars have argued that there are elements of biblical events and incidents noted in the Qur’an and because the bible came first before the Qur’an such events and incidents must have been from the Bible. Some have argued that they were as results of divine revelation, that is, God communicating his mind to humans. Whichever side you take, this writing aims to uplift human spirits to righteousness, peace and joy and seeks to bridge the gap between Christianity and Islam.   The Mary Q...