Skip to main content

Gods’ Names of Ancient Times – Satisfactory but Actions Undesirable

Table of Contents

This writing argues that these names of God-gods of ancient times were satisfactory while their actions could be construed as undesirable, hence the polytheistic nature of their religions.

The naming of the gods

Many ancient religions associated meanings with the names given to the gods; meanings that arguably were derived from their life situations. Gods’ names were contextualized from roles that were deemed beyond the natural activities of humans or what humans could not naturally control. Such feats were attributed to the supernatural. We see these definite names of gods in ancient Mesopotamia as classical examples.

One god could not have dealt with all the human problems or sorrows of their times. It is believed that the Semitic world shares many things in common. The Sumerians did not speak Semitic Languages notwithstanding their settlement in the southern part of the region between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. Their neighbours, the Akkadians moved to the north, and the Babylonians; and the Assyrians lived farther north of Tigris. These ancient peoples had similar religions and worshipped almost identical humanly invoked utilitarian gods and goddesses. Possibly, human life’s situations might be reasons for the acknowledgement of the existence of gods.

The idea of a God is a rationalisation of a supreme creator, over and above, and who is analogously referenced to by different names and attributes by different religions. It could be argued that all gods are ancillary deities operating in the shadows of the supreme God.

I was once asked by a 10-year-old boy about human and gods' primacy. Humans and the gods who first existed. It was a tough question to answer. Beliefs in nature, which includes plants, animals, landscapes, and other products of the earth are clear evidence that those existed before humans. Many sacred texts’ literalists and theists would acknowledge this fact and even the naturalists would agree with this. Creationism asserts that humans were created by God after other things were created. Humans were the last arrivals on the natural stage. If this is the case, can we rightly say that the gods existed on account of nature and were not caused by humans? If we accept such, then the gods’ names of ancient times were satisfactory, because they signify what they represented. They were fine, satisfactory, and powerful in their different capacities, and made themselves known to the people as opposed to the claims that their naming and name associations were as results of human sufferings or sorrows caused by the gods as punishments to humans.  

Gods' Names - Satisfactory or Undesirable?

Some will argue that these gods’ names of ancient times were undesirable and that they were a result of human sufferings which necessitated the need to appease them and solicit their help against natural disasters or misfortunes.

The Semitic peoples interpreted their beliefs in the gods from the roles they played, such as in creation, fertility, death, or the afterlife.

The names of the gods were embraced to compensate for the peoples’ wishes and yearnings. The names were adopted to propitiate the gods and were mythologized in war, famine, storms, or creation.

Below are references to some ancient mythological names of the gods; some revealing either the satisfactoriness of their names or the undesirability of their actions from their roles or titles.   

Adad  

Adad is considered the weather god of the Babylonian and Assyrian pantheon. The Sumerian equivalent of Adad was Ishkur and the West Semitic was Hadad.

Adad had two separate roles to play: It can give life and take it. As lord of abundance, he caused the rain to fall and the land to bear fruit for his friends. However, when he was angry, he could send storms and hurricanes against his enemies.

Allah 

In Arabic, it is Allāh (“God”) and the one and only God in Islam. The name Allah is considered a contraction of the Arabic al-Ilāh, “the God.” Arguably, the word for god can be traced back to the Semitic writings designating words for god, such as il, el or Eloah. Allah is considered in Islam as having no associate and nothing can be associated with him.

Anat 

She was a northwest Semitic goddess who was also worshipped in ancient Egypt. The variance of her name includes: ‘nt in Ugarit and Anath in Greek. Notably, she was considered a goddess of war, love, and fertility, as well as a protector, agent of vengeance, and giver of life.

Anu 

He is viewed as a creator and sky god with supreme power. His name signified the “One on High”. Anu and his sons Enlil and Enki constitute a triune god, namely ‘Transcendental’ obscurity (Anu), ‘Transcendent’ (Enlil) and ‘Immanent’ (Enki).

The three gods correspond to the three divisions of the heavens: Anu (the ancient god of the heavens), Enlil (the god of the air and the forces of nature, and lord of the gods), and Enki (the beneficent god of earth and life, who lived in the depth of the waters).

Ashur 

Ashur (variously spelt as Ashshur, Assur) is identified as an East Semitic god and the chief god of the Assyrian pantheon. By representation, Ashur was identified as the winged sun and appeared often in Assyrian iconography. The Assyrian kings take their names to include that of Ashur and there were various designations depicting Ashur as an important deity to the Assyrians, such as “bêlu rabû "great lord", ab ilâni "father of gods", šadû rabû "great mountain", and il aššurî "god of Ashur."

Baal 

Baal (or Ba’al) was an ancient Canaanite god associated with fertility and produce. The byname ‘giver of life’ was attributed to him, and humans were dependent on his ability to provide them with food. Also, Baal was given the title ‘son of Dragon’ designating him as the controller of the grain. By way of appeasing him, he was called ‘Hadad’, the storm god who provided rain when invoked.    

Dagon 

The dragon was the chief deity of the Philistines. He was the god of fertility, vegetation, and military might. He was at the centre stage of the Philistine concepts of death and the afterlife.

Elohim 

Elohim means ‘supreme one’ or ‘mighty one’. In the Semitic world, it is understood as a Canaanite father of the gods, and creator god. The name in a biblical sense could not only be used to refer to the Supreme God, but it can also be used to refer to “human rulers, judges, and even angels.” The term Elohim can be written in shortened form as El and then followed by another word, such as in the names Elijah (‘El is Yahweh’, that is God is Yahweh) and Samuel (‘Heard by El’, that is heard by God).

Ishtar 

Ishtar is known variously as Ishtar among the Akkadians, then Inanna for the Sumerians. Its counterpart was the West Semitic goddess called Astarte. Ishtar is a goddess of war, light, life, and sexual love.

Marduk 

Marduk was the head of the Babylonian pantheon who was responsible for justice, healing, compassion, magic, and fairness. For both the Greeks and Romans, its equivalent was Zeus and Jupiter, respectively. He is often shown in human form wearing royal attires bearing a snake-dragon and a spade. Historically, Marduk’s origin has been linked to a local deity known as Asarluhi, which was a farmer's god symbolized by the spade, known as a marru. His name translates as 'bull-calf,' although he was known as Bel (Lord).

Shamash 

In Akkadian, it is Shamash while in Sumerian, it is Utu. Shamash is known as the god of the sun. Similarly, in “Mesopotamian religion, the god of the sun, with the moon god, Sin (Sumerian: Nanna), and Ishtar (Sumerian: Inanna), the goddess of Venus, was part of an astral triad of divinities.” Shamash was the son of Sin.

He was identified as “the solar deity,” who had power over darkness and evil. This gave him the approval as the god of justice and equity and the power to judge both gods and humans. By day, he was a sun god and by night he became the judge of the underworld.

Yahweh (or YHWH) 

In Jewish tradition, “Yahweh” is the only and all-powerful God. This name Yahweh is too holy that the people dared not say it out loud. As time went on, the name began to see replacements with names, such as, “Adonai,” or “My Lord,” especially when speaking. Also, the name “Elohim,” which simply stands for “God” was used to replace the name, Yahweh. But the two names “Adonai” and “Elohim” were also used to refer to other things that are not God. Yahweh is exclusively a name reserved for God.

From the above, it can be argued that God-gods’ names of ancient times were copacetic, and their actions could be viewed as unsatisfactory by human judgements. But their actions are not human calls, but divinities.

There is no competition between natural and supernatural or between mortal and immortal. One is the worshipper and the other is the worshipped. Therefore, humans are at the receiving end of the gods. Except for Yahweh, who explicitly, according to biblical tradition claimed that his name is “I AM WHO I AM”, every other God-gods name of ancient times could be considered as originating from humans. But they were still gods, divinities.

Some of the gods played dual roles, such as giver of life and taker of life, sun god and judge of the underworld, goddess of war and life, sending favours to friends but punishment to enemies. Some cannot be associated with anything and some whose names cannot be said aloud. There is a sense of the sacred in the eyes and lives of the ancient peoples however, fear of the unknown, punishments, catastrophes, and death might be reasons for the names given to the gods. These fears were imagined as being exerted by the gods.    

Sources

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica, Adad in Encyclopædia Britannica, March 08, 2016. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Adad (accessed January 10, 2021)

Myths Encyclopaedia, Semitic Mythology. http://www.mythencyclopedia.com/Sa-Sp/Semitic-Mythology.html (accessed 03 January 2021)

Orr, James, M.A., D.D. General Editor. Semites, Semitic Religion. International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia. 1915. https://www.biblestudytools.com/encyclopedias/isbe/semites-semitic-religion.html (accessed 03 January 2021)

Joshua J. Mark, Anu in Ancient History Encyclopaedia, 20 January 2017. https://www.ancient.eu/Anu/ (accessed 10 January 2021).

J. Hill, Anat in Ancient Egypt Online, 2010. https://ancientegyptonline.co.uk/anat/ (accessed 03 January 2021).

Ashur (god) in Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashur_%28god%29 (accessed 10 January 2021).

The worship of Baal, in Bible History. https://www.bible-history.com/resource/ff_baal.htm (accessed 10 January 2021).

Dagon Chief god of the Philistines in Learn Religions, Judd H. Burton, January 30, 2020. https://www.learnreligions.com/dagon-chief-god-of-the-philistines-118505 (accessed 07 January 2021).

What Does Elohim Mean and Why Is This Name of God So Important? In Bible Study Tools, Mike Leake, 14 September 2019. https://www.biblestudytools.com/bible-study/topical-studies/elohim-supreme-one-mighty-one.html (accessed January 8, 2021).

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica, Ishtar in Encyclopædia Britannica, August 28, 2019. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Ishtar-Mesopotamian-goddess (accessed January 12, 2021)

Marduk, Definition in Ancient History Encyclopaedia, Joshua J. Mark, 09 December 2016. https://www.ancient.eu/Marduk/ (accessed 12 January 2021).

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica, Shamash in Encyclopædia Britannica, March 04, 2020. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Shamash (accessed January 12, 2021). 

Comments

I think there can only really be one Creator. We can give Him different names, but his essence will not change.
As for the large number of gods mentioned in ancient texts, I believe that this is people's interpretation of some natural and human anomalies, their deification.
It is no secret that at all times there were people endowed with something special from birth. For example, an unprecedented power or ability to predict some natural disasters. There is a possibility that there were such people before, and because they were different from others, they were worshipped in life, deified after death, and passed on stories about them to the next generations. Usually, such legends become more colorful with each new generation.
Other ancient gods were the personification of human fears. I agree with you here. After all, it is much easier to survive your fear, making it something alive and understandable. And since all fear feeds on our ignorance, the rites of sacrifice have arisen.
In fact, this topic is very large and interesting. Thanks.
iPostThisWeek said…
Like you said Elena, the topic is large. You have given it a personal interpretive summary. Thanks for your read.

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: Power, Decay, and the Price of "My Turn"

Title: Emilokon or The Fable of the Termites Author: Joe Barnabas Genre: Political Satire / Literary Allegory In his latest work, Joe Barnabas delivers a biting, visceral exploration of a society in the throes of transformation, and perhaps, disintegration. Emilokon or The Fable of the Termites is not merely a story; it is a mirror held up to the face of modern leadership and the systemic "termites" that hollow out the foundations of our shared home. The Heart of the Fable The title itself, Emilokon , carries the weight of entitlement and historical destiny, while the subtitle provides the darker metaphor. Barnabas masterfully utilizes the image of the termite: a creature that consumes from the inside out, often unnoticed until the structure collapses. This serves as a hauntingly familiar representation of the creeping greed and administrative decay currently plaguing our world. Structure and Pace Spanning 36 meticulously crafted chapters, the book feels lik...

The Self-Alternating Theory (Part II): The Fractured Mirror of Context

In the first iteration of the Self-Alternating Theory, we dismantled the illusion of portable identity. We demonstrated that if you were transplanted into the life of a failed leader, a sex worker, a saint, or an elite athlete, you would not reform or master their world from an enlightened external perspective. You would either crumble under the weight of an alien context or absorb their exact trajectory. Part II extends this radical lens across the fundamental fault lines of human experience: relationships, race, geopolitics, physical embodiment, and the outer boundaries of species existence.                        The underlying principle remains absolute: we do not take our intact "I" into another person's reality. The reality reshapes, overwrites, or breaks the "I." Relational Systems: The Model Partner vs. The Toxic Household We routinely look at fractured marriages...

The Self-Alternating Theory: Why We Can Never Truly Be the Other

We live in a culture obsessed with the exercise of perspective-taking. We tell ourselves to "walk a mile in another person’s shoes," if our core self: our moral compass, our intellectual agility, our refined tastes, and our personal ethics remains intact during the journey. We imagine slipping into the lives of others like costume changes in a play: maintaining our internal "I" while operating the external machinery of someone else's life. The Self-Alternating Theory challenges this fundamental illusion. It posits a sobering premise: you cannot be the other, whether in their best or worst selves. If you were truly transplanted into another person’s existence: inheriting their exact neurobiology, trauma, muscle memory, history, and social incentives you would not reform their life from an enlightened, outside perspective. You would either collapse under the weight of an alien context or become the very thing you previously judged, admired, or misunderstood. ...

Who’s A Rebel? Camus’ The Rebel and the NigeriaSphere

In the contemporary Nigerian landscape, the word "rebel" is often weaponized by those in power. To the state, a rebel is a transgressor of the Cybercrimes Act, a "disturber of the peace," or an agent of destabilization. However, if we look through the eyes of Albert Camus, the 20th-century philosopher of the absurd, we find a different definition; one that validates the citizen’s cry for good governance not as an act of subversion, but as an act of profound affirmation. The Camusian "No": An Act of "Yes" Camus begins his treatise with a startlingly simple observation: "What is a rebel? A man who says no." But this "no" is not a denial of order. When a Nigerian citizen takes to social media to demand transparency or decry the absence of the rule of law, they are saying "no" to a specific limit that has been breached. Camus argues that in saying no, the rebel is simultaneously saying "yes" to the existen...

Accessibility: from Philosophical Perspectives

Introduction This article aims to examine the concept of accessibility from some philosophical principles: Utilitarianism and the principle of ‘one and many.’ Doing this will bring to the fore the reason why accessibility is the cynosure of inclusivity. Understanding Accessibility Accessibility refers to the design of products, devices, services, or environments that are usable for everyone. It ensures that everyone, regardless of their abilities or limitations, can effectively interact with and benefit from a product, technology, environment, or service. The term ‘accessibility’ has its origin in French. It can be said to be borrowed from the French “ accessibilite ,” meaning “the quality of being able to be reached or accessed.” This French term might have been influenced by the late Latin accessibilis , from Latin accessus (past participle of accēdere , meaning “to approach”, “to enter”, “to access”, or “to log in.” According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, the ...