Skip to main content

When the Powerful Devour the Poor: Who Destroys More - Herdsmen or Government?

Nigeria’s poorest citizens are locked in a silent contest of survival against two very different but equally destructive forces. On one side stand the unregulated pastoralists whose cattle roam freely into farmlands. On the other side stand the political elites: governors, commissioners, and agencies, who bulldoze homes and seize ancestral lands in the name of industrialization, road expansion, and “development.”

One group carries sticks and machetes: the other carries constitutions, bulldozers, and state power. Yet the outcome for the poor is strikingly similar: dispossession, hunger, and despair.

The Pastoralist Problem: When Cattle Become Weapons

Across many rural communities, herders release their cattle into farmlands as though the crops were planted for the animals. Maize, cassava, rice, yam leaves, legumes, everything becomes fodder. These are not just crops; they are the lifeline of families who depend on them for food, school fees, and survival.

Humans eat crops. Humans eat cattle. Both are essential to life. But why should one human meal destroy the other? Why should cattle be allowed to wipe out the very crops that sustain the people who raise them?

If cattle continue to destroy farmlands unchecked, a grim cycle emerges. Farmers lose their livelihoods. Hunger spreads. People abandon farming. And eventually, even the cattle will have nothing left to eat because the humans who plant the crops have been starved out of existence. It is a slow, painful erasure of rural life.

The Government Problem: Development as Displacement

On the opposite end of the spectrum lies a more polished, more official, and far more devastating force: government‑sanctioned land grabbing. Under the banner of “industrialization,” “urban renewal,” or “road expansion,” state governments seize vast tracts of land from the poor, often without adequate compensation, consultation, or alternatives.

Consider a state that already has a functioning international cargo airport. Instead of improving it, the governor decides to build another one, this time on the farmlands of poor communities in Orumba North. Thousands of families lose the only asset they have: land.

What is the logic of building two massive airports in a state with limited land mass? What is the wisdom in turning every village into a concrete jungle of airports, estates, and industrial zones? Bricks do not grow food. Cement does not feed children.

When farmlands disappear, so does food security. When ancestral lands are seized, so does identity. And when the poor are pushed aside for “development,” their future collapses.

The Poor Are Not Protected - They Are Preyed Upon

Nigeria has no meaningful safety net. No welfare system. No structured support for displaced farmers. When the government takes land, the poor are left with nothing but grief and generational poverty. Their children inherit not land, but loss.

The tragedy is not only that the government fails to provide for the people. It is that the same government now covets the little the poor have managed to build for themselves. The national treasury has been looted dry; now the political class turns to the land of the powerless.

The divide is staggering. The rich and politically elevated do not feel what the poor feel. They do not go to the same markets. They do not queue in the same hospitals. They do not drink from the same wells. They live in another world entirely: one where bulldozers erase homes with the stroke of a pen.

Who Destroys More?

The herdsmen destroy crops.
The government destroys futures.

One destroys with cattle.
The other destroys with policy.

One is unlicensed.
The other is licensed.

But the poor suffer under both.

The real question is not who destroys more, but why the poor must always be the ones destroyed. Why must their land be the battlefield for every contest of power: whether pastoral or political?

A Call for Justice and Humanity

Nigeria cannot continue this path. A nation that eats its poor is a nation that starves its future. Development must not be synonymous with displacement. Security must not be synonymous with silence. Governance must not be synonymous with grabbing.

The land belongs to the people who live on it, farm it, and depend on it, not to those who see it as a trophy for political legacy projects.

Until the poor are protected, Nigeria will remain a country where the powerful: whether herdsmen or governors destroy without consequence. The people who feed the nation will continue to be the ones most easily sacrificed. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Either Early Accreditation of Party Agent Tags or Meltdown: January 2027 General Election in Nigeria

As Nigeria edges closer to the January 16, 2027, general election, electoral integrity hangs on a seemingly minor administrative detail: the timely, transparent accreditation and issuance of party agent tags. In a modern democracy, polling agents are the first line of defence against election fraud. They act as the eyes and ears of political parties, observing voter accreditation, ballot casting, manual counting, and digital result transmission. Yet, across successive election cycles, the distribution of accreditation tags by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has been plagued by administrative delays, portal crashes, and last-minute logistical logjams. With the 2027 polls approaching under a revised electoral schedule, failing to fix party agent accreditation will risk operational confusion and voter disillusionment. The Operational Reality of Party Agent Tags Party agent tags are not mere identification cards; they are statutory tools of access and oversight...

Choose One – Either Christian Genocide or Pogrom in Nigeria

The language we use to describe mass violence is never neutral. Words like genocide and pogrom carry immense historical, legal, and moral weight. In Nigeria, where Christian communities have endured repeated waves of violence, the debate over terminology is not merely academic; it shapes international responses, frames justice claims, and influences whether the world recognizes the urgency of intervention. To understand Nigeria’s situation, we must situate it within the long arc of history, comparing past pogroms and genocides, and examining how international law defines these crimes. Pogroms: Episodic Violence with Historical Roots The term pogrom emerged in Tsarist Russia in the late 19th century, describing mob attacks against Jewish communities. These pogroms were often tolerated or encouraged by authorities, leaving homes destroyed, synagogues desecrated, and thousands displaced. Example:   The Kishinev Pogrom of 1903 killed dozens of Jews, injured hundreds, and shock...

Nigeria’s Ordeal: Either Shamelessness Has Been Democratised or Patronised by the Political Elite

The Death of Moral Restraint In classical ethics, shame ( aidos ) is considered the essential buffer between temptation and transgression. It is the quiet voice that preserves integrity when no one is watching, and the social weight that enforces accountability when everyone is. To say that Nigeria is suffering an ordeal is to state the obvious; to diagnose that ordeal as a crisis of shamelessness goes straight to the heart of the nation’s condition. Nigeria’s tragedy is not merely economic failure, weak infrastructure, or institutional decay. Those are symptoms. The underlying disease is the complete loss of public and private shame: a moral decay that began as a patronised tool of the political class and has since been democratised across everyday civil society. The Antecedents: How Shamelessness Took Root The historical road to this point was paved in stages: The Rupture of Traditional Ethics Prior to modern statehood, indigenous African societies relied heavily on comm...

The Conflict between the Deities (Igwe and Amadioha) in Igbo Mythology over a Heat Wave

Table of Contents Introduction The Deity – Igwe The Deity – Amadioha The Conflict between Igwe and Amadioha Introduction The current heat wave reminds me of the conflict between two Igbo deities, namely: Igwe and Amadioha. Just as it was noted somewhere in this blog: Nigeria's Diversity and the South-East/South-South Peripheral Inclusions: Biafra's Raison d'etre , November 15, 2021, the Igbo people are the third-largest ethnic group who live in southeastern Nigeria. They have a very rich culture and tradition among which is their concept of God which varies from one community to another but essentially, they believe that the gods guide and control their life and affairs in many ways. The Igbo concept of God stems from the idea of a chief god who creates everything. This god is supreme. The Igbo variously call this god Olisa bu uwa (the god who carries the world), Olisa bini Igwe , (the god who lives in the sky), Chukwu (the great god), or Chineke (the god who creates...

Anchored in the Storm: Living Authentic African Identity in the Age of Hyper-Modernity

The Crisis of Belonging Modernity has unleashed a globalizing force that flattens cultural distinctions, replacing localized ancestral wisdom with uniform, hyper-consumerist ideals. For the contemporary African, this manifests as a profound existential tension: how to honour an inheritance built on community, moral dignity, and natural balance while living in a digital landscape driven by individualism, performative aesthetics, and immediate gratification. Living an authentic African identity today is not about escaping into a romanticized past. It is an intentional, daily practice of reclaiming internal autonomy in a world designed to erode it. Forces Assaulting Traditional Life To resist modern cultural pressures, one must first recognize how they systematically undermine traditional ways of living: Individualism vs. Ubuntu (I am because we are) Hyper-modern culture elevates the solitary ego. Success is measured by personal accumulation and self-promotion, directly contra...