Skip to main content

When the Powerful Devour the Poor: Who Destroys More - Herdsmen or Government?

Nigeria’s poorest citizens are locked in a silent contest of survival against two very different but equally destructive forces. On one side stand the unregulated pastoralists whose cattle roam freely into farmlands. On the other side stand the political elites: governors, commissioners, and agencies, who bulldoze homes and seize ancestral lands in the name of industrialization, road expansion, and “development.”

One group carries sticks and machetes: the other carries constitutions, bulldozers, and state power. Yet the outcome for the poor is strikingly similar: dispossession, hunger, and despair.

The Pastoralist Problem: When Cattle Become Weapons

Across many rural communities, herders release their cattle into farmlands as though the crops were planted for the animals. Maize, cassava, rice, yam leaves, legumes, everything becomes fodder. These are not just crops; they are the lifeline of families who depend on them for food, school fees, and survival.

Humans eat crops. Humans eat cattle. Both are essential to life. But why should one human meal destroy the other? Why should cattle be allowed to wipe out the very crops that sustain the people who raise them?

If cattle continue to destroy farmlands unchecked, a grim cycle emerges. Farmers lose their livelihoods. Hunger spreads. People abandon farming. And eventually, even the cattle will have nothing left to eat because the humans who plant the crops have been starved out of existence. It is a slow, painful erasure of rural life.

The Government Problem: Development as Displacement

On the opposite end of the spectrum lies a more polished, more official, and far more devastating force: government‑sanctioned land grabbing. Under the banner of “industrialization,” “urban renewal,” or “road expansion,” state governments seize vast tracts of land from the poor, often without adequate compensation, consultation, or alternatives.

Consider a state that already has a functioning international cargo airport. Instead of improving it, the governor decides to build another one, this time on the farmlands of poor communities in Orumba North. Thousands of families lose the only asset they have: land.

What is the logic of building two massive airports in a state with limited land mass? What is the wisdom in turning every village into a concrete jungle of airports, estates, and industrial zones? Bricks do not grow food. Cement does not feed children.

When farmlands disappear, so does food security. When ancestral lands are seized, so does identity. And when the poor are pushed aside for “development,” their future collapses.

The Poor Are Not Protected - They Are Preyed Upon

Nigeria has no meaningful safety net. No welfare system. No structured support for displaced farmers. When the government takes land, the poor are left with nothing but grief and generational poverty. Their children inherit not land, but loss.

The tragedy is not only that the government fails to provide for the people. It is that the same government now covets the little the poor have managed to build for themselves. The national treasury has been looted dry; now the political class turns to the land of the powerless.

The divide is staggering. The rich and politically elevated do not feel what the poor feel. They do not go to the same markets. They do not queue in the same hospitals. They do not drink from the same wells. They live in another world entirely: one where bulldozers erase homes with the stroke of a pen.

Who Destroys More?

The herdsmen destroy crops.
The government destroys futures.

One destroys with cattle.
The other destroys with policy.

One is unlicensed.
The other is licensed.

But the poor suffer under both.

The real question is not who destroys more, but why the poor must always be the ones destroyed. Why must their land be the battlefield for every contest of power: whether pastoral or political?

A Call for Justice and Humanity

Nigeria cannot continue this path. A nation that eats its poor is a nation that starves its future. Development must not be synonymous with displacement. Security must not be synonymous with silence. Governance must not be synonymous with grabbing.

The land belongs to the people who live on it, farm it, and depend on it, not to those who see it as a trophy for political legacy projects.

Until the poor are protected, Nigeria will remain a country where the powerful: whether herdsmen or governors destroy without consequence. The people who feed the nation will continue to be the ones most easily sacrificed. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ramadan, Lent, and Yom Kippur: One Fasting – Three Refinements

Table of Contents The Ramadan Fasting (sawm)   Almsgiving (zakat)  Reading of the Qur’an   Night of Qadr   Lent Prayer  Fasting  Almsgiving  Yom Kippur Refrain from Work  Visit to Synagogue   The Kol Nidrei  The Morning Service   The Musaf Service   The Afternoon Service   The Neilah   Attire  Almsgiving   Conclusion Fasting is total or partial abstinence from food, drink, or any gratifications for religious, ethical, or health purposes or reasons. The latter two purposes (ethical and health) are not the subject of this writing. Fasting for religious purposes is the theme of this writing, therefore, we will try to describe each fasting practice as independent of the other. In this writing, we will consider fasting from the perspectives of the three Abrahamic religions: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. The description of the practices will be in descending order (that is, Ramadan, Lent, and Yom Kippur ...

Flat Pipe: Arapaho Creation Myth

Table of Contents Creation Hypotheses and Earth-Diver Myths Creation from nothing and the Dove’s Olive leaf in Judeo-Christian Traditions The mating of Earth Mother and Sky Father in A’shiwi Tribe’s Creation Account. Arapaho Creation Myth Diving into the Bottom of the Waters Conclusion The Arapaho are a Native American people. According to scholars, their presence was first noticed circa 3,000 years ago in the western region of the Great Lakes, along the Red River Valley, which could be now Manitoba in Canada, and Minnesota in the United States. They were popularly agrarians and spoke the Arapahoe language. My main interest is in their understanding of how things came into being. That is, how the Flat Pipe creates in the Arapaho tradition.   Many different creation hypotheses are closely related to the ‘earth-diver’ creation myth. Examining a few of these will help us better understand the Arapaho creation hypothesis. Creation Hypotheses and Earth-Diver Myths The creation hyp...

Names, Visions, and Imageries of the Crow tribe of Native Americans

Table of Contents The Crow: Who are they? Names, Visions, and Imageries Apsaalooke (or Absaroka) The Separations of the Bands The Mountain Crow (Ashalaho) The River Crow The Kicked in the Bellies Chiefs, Their Names and Meanings Chief Long Hair (Issheuhutskitu) Chief Sore Belly (Arapoosh) Chief of the Camp (Ashbacheeitche) Chief of Plenty Coups The rich cultural heritage of the Native Americans is subject to different interpretations beyond the actual meanings as understood by the natives. The Crow tribe’s names, visions, and imageries are not spared from these relative interpretations. It is claimed that these names, visions, and imageries denote exaggerations, triumphalism, or cultural symbolism. Also, their name can visually reveal the true meanings of descriptive language and metaphors or similes in words and expressions.   The objective of this writing is to examine these names and imageries to differentiate the Europeans’ interpretations of the names and lifestyle of the Cr...

Trinity and Tawhid – The Same or Unique?

Table of Contents God/god Explained Same or Unique? Trinity and Tawhid: Synonyms and Polysemy Conclusion The concept of monotheism is the belief that there is only one God. It is a concept of theism that specifies itself as distinct from other theisms, such as polytheism, ditheism, or tritheism. The concept of monotheism is distinctive and accepts indivisibility while maintaining the uniqueness of God. The question that comes to mind is: who is this God? What about Him? The Christians, with a few exceptions, agree that “there are three persons in one God, God the Father, God, the Son and God, the Holy Spirit.” Therefore, Christians profess that God is a Trinity, which is the focal point of the Christian concept of monotheism. When compared to Islam, it is completely a different understanding. For Muslims, “there is no god but God, and Muhammad is the prophet of God.” This is normally put in this way: “ašhadu ʾan lā ʾilāha ʾilla -llāhu, wa-ʾašhadu ʾanna muḥammadan rasūlu -llāh,” that i...

The Weyekin in Nez Percé Tribe and Catholic Angels

Table of Contents The Nez Percé People Catholic Teachings on Angels The Spirit, Weyekin in Nez Percé Tribe This writing is to briefly identify and recognize some cultural values of the Nez Percé tribe, especially their belief in Weyekin, often described as a personal guiding angel. The concept of a guiding angel provokes Catholic teachings about angels and comparison with the Nez Percé Weyekin, as the guiding spirit. But that will be a new piece of writing for the future. There can be a cross-cultural gleaning of ideas from nature, beliefs, and interactions.     The Nez Percé People The term Nez Percé, meaning “pierced nose” is the French coinage to describe the Nimiipuu tribe. The term Nimiipuu, meaning “we, the people” is a name the tribe used for themselves and their language, a part of the Sahaptin family. Early contacts with the Europeans, especially French explorers made the name Nez Percé popular because they unfairly adopted the name Nez Percé and u...