Skip to main content

When the Powerful Devour the Poor: Who Destroys More - Herdsmen or Government?

Nigeria’s poorest citizens are locked in a silent contest of survival against two very different but equally destructive forces. On one side stand the unregulated pastoralists whose cattle roam freely into farmlands. On the other side stand the political elites: governors, commissioners, and agencies, who bulldoze homes and seize ancestral lands in the name of industrialization, road expansion, and “development.”

One group carries sticks and machetes: the other carries constitutions, bulldozers, and state power. Yet the outcome for the poor is strikingly similar: dispossession, hunger, and despair.

The Pastoralist Problem: When Cattle Become Weapons

Across many rural communities, herders release their cattle into farmlands as though the crops were planted for the animals. Maize, cassava, rice, yam leaves, legumes, everything becomes fodder. These are not just crops; they are the lifeline of families who depend on them for food, school fees, and survival.

Humans eat crops. Humans eat cattle. Both are essential to life. But why should one human meal destroy the other? Why should cattle be allowed to wipe out the very crops that sustain the people who raise them?

If cattle continue to destroy farmlands unchecked, a grim cycle emerges. Farmers lose their livelihoods. Hunger spreads. People abandon farming. And eventually, even the cattle will have nothing left to eat because the humans who plant the crops have been starved out of existence. It is a slow, painful erasure of rural life.

The Government Problem: Development as Displacement

On the opposite end of the spectrum lies a more polished, more official, and far more devastating force: government‑sanctioned land grabbing. Under the banner of “industrialization,” “urban renewal,” or “road expansion,” state governments seize vast tracts of land from the poor, often without adequate compensation, consultation, or alternatives.

Consider a state that already has a functioning international cargo airport. Instead of improving it, the governor decides to build another one, this time on the farmlands of poor communities in Orumba North. Thousands of families lose the only asset they have: land.

What is the logic of building two massive airports in a state with limited land mass? What is the wisdom in turning every village into a concrete jungle of airports, estates, and industrial zones? Bricks do not grow food. Cement does not feed children.

When farmlands disappear, so does food security. When ancestral lands are seized, so does identity. And when the poor are pushed aside for “development,” their future collapses.

The Poor Are Not Protected - They Are Preyed Upon

Nigeria has no meaningful safety net. No welfare system. No structured support for displaced farmers. When the government takes land, the poor are left with nothing but grief and generational poverty. Their children inherit not land, but loss.

The tragedy is not only that the government fails to provide for the people. It is that the same government now covets the little the poor have managed to build for themselves. The national treasury has been looted dry; now the political class turns to the land of the powerless.

The divide is staggering. The rich and politically elevated do not feel what the poor feel. They do not go to the same markets. They do not queue in the same hospitals. They do not drink from the same wells. They live in another world entirely: one where bulldozers erase homes with the stroke of a pen.

Who Destroys More?

The herdsmen destroy crops.
The government destroys futures.

One destroys with cattle.
The other destroys with policy.

One is unlicensed.
The other is licensed.

But the poor suffer under both.

The real question is not who destroys more, but why the poor must always be the ones destroyed. Why must their land be the battlefield for every contest of power: whether pastoral or political?

A Call for Justice and Humanity

Nigeria cannot continue this path. A nation that eats its poor is a nation that starves its future. Development must not be synonymous with displacement. Security must not be synonymous with silence. Governance must not be synonymous with grabbing.

The land belongs to the people who live on it, farm it, and depend on it, not to those who see it as a trophy for political legacy projects.

Until the poor are protected, Nigeria will remain a country where the powerful: whether herdsmen or governors destroy without consequence. The people who feed the nation will continue to be the ones most easily sacrificed. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Same-Sex Marriage in Igbo Cultural Traditions

Table of Contents The Igbo Tribe Same-Sex Marriage – Definition & Brief History Same-Sex Marriage in Igbo Cultural Traditions Conclusion This writing claims that same-sex marriage in Igbo culture is necessary, an improvisation, and a  ‘like with like’  construal. By construal, it places Igbo same-sex marriage in a social psychological context and views an individual as finding out ways or means to understand and interpret his-her surroundings, and the behaviour and actions of the people around and towards him-her. The reason for this claim is not far-fetched. The Igbo Tribe The Igbo is a major ethnic group in Nigeria with an estimated population of about 32 million. It is one of the largest in Africa adding to 18% of the total 177 million people of Nigeria. Igbo land consists of Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu, and Imo states of Nigeria. However, Igbos can be found in these other states of Nigeria: Rivers, Delta, Akwa Ibom, and Cross River. Outside of Nigeria, the Igbo tribe ...

How the Christians perceived Islam, Prophet Muhammad and Muslims from the 8th to the 15th Centuries – Part 1

Introduction The early and medieval Christians have no theological or legal (in terms of biblical) perspectives in their perceptions of Islam, Prophet Muhammad and Muslims. Contrary to the Qur’an and Muslims who theologically, and legally perceived Christians and Christianity perhaps because of Christianity’s antecedents. Islam theologically presented a series of quandaries to early and medieval Christianity, such that some of them viewed Muslim's as pagans and some as heretics or schismatics. The Christian polemicists hardly used the term Islam or Muslim to identify their rivalry, instead, the preferences to terms such as ‘Saracens, Hagarenes, Arabs, Turks, Pagans, Moors or simply, those who follow the Law of Muhammad’ were prevalent. This writing aims to examine by typologies, the polemics of Christians that cover from the 8th century to the 15th century and discussing Christianity's arguments from the perspectives of:   St. John Damascene (675-753) Heresy and Heresia...

Trinity and Tawhid – The Same or Unique?

Table of Contents God/god Explained Same or Unique? Trinity and Tawhid: Synonyms and Polysemy Conclusion The concept of monotheism is the belief that there is only one God. It is a concept of theism that specifies itself as distinct from other theisms, such as polytheism, ditheism, or tritheism. The concept of monotheism is distinctive and accepts indivisibility while maintaining the uniqueness of God. The question that comes to mind is: who is this God? What about Him? The Christians, with a few exceptions, agree that “there are three persons in one God, God the Father, God, the Son and God, the Holy Spirit.” Therefore, Christians profess that God is a Trinity, which is the focal point of the Christian concept of monotheism. When compared to Islam, it is completely a different understanding. For Muslims, “there is no god but God, and Muhammad is the prophet of God.” This is normally put in this way: “ašhadu ʾan lā ʾilāha ʾilla -llāhu, wa-ʾašhadu ʾanna muḥammadan rasūlu -llāh,” that i...

Clan System in Igboland: The Traditional Imperatives

Table of Contents What is a Clan? Clan System in Igboland Umunna-Umuada Structure In the article,  Nigeria's Diversity and the South-East/South-South Peripheral Inclusions: Biafra's raison d'etre,  Igbo people, and territory were briefly discussed as embodied in the notional term, Biafra. I will refer readers to that article if they want to find out more about Igboland and its territories. In this article, my main concern is to discuss the clan system in Igboland as a long-established and commanding phenomenon. What is a Clan? Before moving any further, it will be relevant to give a few understandings of what clan means. What is a clan? According to R.N Sharma, “clan is a collection of ‘unilateral’ families whose members believe themselves to be the common descendants of a real or mythical ancestor.” Then Majumdar and Madan defined clan as: a combination of a few lineages and descents that may be ultimately traced to a mythical ancestor, who may be a human or ...

The Government of Papa Oyoyoo: The Incorrigible vs. The Incorruptible

In the nostalgic tapestry of Nigerian childhood, few phrases carry the rhythmic joy of "Papa Oyoyoo!" It is the ecstatic cry of children who hear the turn of a key or the rumble of a Peugeot engine. It signals the return of the provider, the protector, and, most importantly, the bearer of gifts. But in the theatre of modern Nigerian politics, this innocent greeting has been weaponized and perverted.   We are currently witnessing the era of the "Papa Oyoyoo Government"; a systemic tragedy where the "children" are middle-aged governors, and the "gifts" are the hollow spoils of a dying economy. A Study in Sycophancy The recent state visit of the President to London provided a masterclass in this dysfunction. The optics were staggering. Before the presidential jet even taxied onto the runway in Abuja, a "beehive" of high-ranking officials: senators, ministers, and state governors had already abandoned their constitutional duties to fo...