Skip to main content

They argue about his worth; they debate his work; but the people chant one name - Iheọma! Iheọma! Iheọma! Iheọma!

Introduction

“Iheọma adịghị onye ọsọ,” meaning “No one rejects goodness.” It is one of the simplest truths in Igbo philosophy: a truth sung, danced, and passed from generation to generation.

This truth was immortalized by The Oriental Brothers International Band, the legendary highlife group that emerged in the early 1970s, just after the Nigerian‑Biafran War. Their music became a cultural balm for a people rebuilding from trauma. Through rhythm, proverbs, and communal storytelling, they reminded the Igbo nation, and Nigeria at large, that dignity, hope, and goodness were still worth striving for.

In their song, they proclaim:

  • Toyota Motor: who would reject it?
  • Mercedes Benz: who would refuse it?
  • Honda 175: who would say no?
  • If your father were a king: would you dislike it?
  • If your brother prospered: would you not rejoice?

The message is simple and universal: Goodness is desirable. Goodness is human. Goodness is for everyone. Yet in today’s Nigeria, this simple truth is turned upside down.

Goodness a Privilege?

Across the nation, ordinary people are denied the very things that make life liveable:

  • steady electricity
  • affordable food
  • functioning hospitals
  • safe roads
  • quality education
  • security
  • economic opportunity

These are not luxuries. They are iheọma, the basic goodness every human being deserves.

But instead of ensuring that goodness flows to the many, Nigeria’s political class often behaves as though goodness belongs only to the few. Public resources become private inheritance. Policies are shaped not by the common good but by personal gain. The people are asked to endure hardship while leaders enjoy the very comforts they fail to provide. It is a painful contradiction: A nation where goodness exists but is hoarded.

The Governor - Goodness Made Tangible

A different kind of leadership emerges when a governor treats public service as stewardship rather than spectacle. His work is demanding not because he seeks difficulty, but because he refuses shortcuts. He sees goodness where others see obstacles, recognizes dignity where others see statistics, and touches goodness in the quiet, unglamorous decisions that shape daily life. His days stretch long, his tasks multiply, yet he moves with a grounded conviction that governance is measured not by noise but by quiet transformation. In a region where hope has often been stretched thin, he insists on weaving it back together through consistent, tangible acts that remind his people that goodness is not a myth but practice, a light tended through patient, persistent work so that others may experience it fully.

The Oriental Brothers: A Cultural Compass Pointing Toward Shared Goodness

To understand the weight of this contradiction, one must return to the Oriental Brothers themselves.

Formed in the aftermath of war, the band became a symbol of Igbo resilience. Their music carried the emotional labour of a people rebuilding identity, community, and hope. They sang not from comfort, but from the ashes of loss, insisting that goodness was still possible, still necessary, still meant for all.

Their message was not abstract philosophy. It was lived experience. It was cultural truth. It was a reminder that even in suffering, the human spirit longs for fairness, dignity, and shared wellbeing.

So, when they sang “Iheọma adịghị onye ọsọ,” they were not merely praising material comfort. They were affirming a worldview: Goodness is a communal right, not a privilege for the powerful.

The Song’s Prayer: “Chi anyị zọba anyị”

The song also carries a deep spiritual plea:

  • “Chi anyị zọba anyị n’elu ụwa” meaning: God, save us in this world.
  • “K’anyi yọba Olisa Onyenweanyị” meaning: Let us bow before the Creator.

This prayer resonates painfully today. Nigerians pray not because they lack ambition or resilience, but because the structures meant to support their wellbeing often collapse around them.

The people pray because:

  • they work hard yet remain poor
  • they vote yet remain unheard
  • they hope yet remain disappointed

The song’s prayer becomes a national lament: Why must goodness be a miracle instead of a right?

The Irony of “Would You Refuse a Toyota?”

The Oriental Brothers used humour to make a profound point: No one rejects good things.

But in Nigeria today, the irony is sharp:

  • Leaders ride in convoys while citizens trek long distances.
  • Leaders receive world‑class healthcare while hospitals lack basic supplies.
  • Leaders enjoy stable power while communities live in darkness.
  • Leaders send their children abroad while public schools’ decay.

The question becomes: Why do those who already have so much deny the people even the smallest share of goodness?

Iheọma as a Social Contract

In Igbo worldview, iheọma is not merely material comfort. It is justice, fairness, and communal wellbeing. It is the belief that society thrives when goodness circulates, not when it is locked away.

A government that withholds goodness breaks the social contract. A nation that normalizes suffering betrays its own people. A leadership that treats public welfare as charity misunderstands its purpose. Nigeria’s crisis is not the absence of goodness; it is the mismanagement of it.

Reclaiming the Meaning of Goodness

To reclaim iheọma, Nigerians must insist on:

  • transparent governance
  • equitable distribution of resources
  • accountability
  • policies that prioritize human dignity
  • leadership that understands service, not entitlement

Goodness should not be a privilege. Goodness should not be a miracle. Goodness should not be a favour from those in power. Goodness is a right.

Conclusion

The Oriental Brothers ended their song with repeated chants of “Iheọma! Iheọma! Iheọma!”
It is almost as if they were reminding the world:

Goodness is meant to be abundant.
Goodness is meant to be shared.
Goodness is meant for everyone.

But Nigeria’s political reality often says otherwise.

This article becomes a call to return to the wisdom of the song; to build a nation where goodness is not hoarded, weaponized, or politicized, but allowed to flow freely to every citizen.

Because truly, “Iheọma adịghị onye ọsọ.” Nobody rejects goodness, except those who deny it to others. Then, politicians say ‘GOODNESS’ is no Good; senators say he’s REPAINTING the roads; but the people CHANT: Iheọma! Iheọma! Iheọma! Iheọma! 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Alternative Self (Part IV): Beyond the Mechanics of Substitution

In Parts 1, 2, and 3 of The Self-Alternating Theory , we mapped the intricate mechanics of human positioning: how individuals continuously swap roles, situations, and existential stations within the architecture of society. We observed the relentless cycle of substitution: how power yields to vulnerability, how victims inherit the machinery of oppression, and how raw human drives alternate between expression and suppression. Yet, mapping the engine of alternation leaves a critical question unanswered: Are we permanently condemned to react to the swap, or can we consciously choose our orientation within it? This is where The Alternative Self emerges, not as a passive participant in life’s endless rotation, but as a deliberate act of internal sovereignty and transformation. Let’s break it down. Breaking the Compulsive Cycle Under the framework of The Self-Alternating Theory , human behaviour often appears deterministic. Bad leadership, tyranny, and destructive compulsions tend t...

Quietness, Provocation, and the Architecture of Human Presence: A Philosophical Dialogue and Leadership Insights

Introduction Human communication is not a single channel but a spectrum. On one end are the gadflies : provocateurs who stir societies and individuals into reflection. On the other end are the taciturn and laconic : those who speak little, or speak briefly, yet whose presence can be unmistakably strong. Understanding these modes of expression is essential for leadership, collaboration, and human connection. Quietness is not absence. Brevity is not passivity. Provocation is not hostility. Each reveals a different way of engaging with the world. This essay explores their meanings, origins, relationships, and significance, culminating in a philosophical dialogue and leadership-focused interpretation. The Gadfly A gadfly is someone who persistently challenges, questions, or provokes others, especially authority. They disrupt complacency and force reflection. Etymologically, gadfly is: Old English gad - spike, goad Fly - the insect that irritates horses. Put...

The Self-Alternating Theory (Part II): The Fractured Mirror of Context

In the first iteration of the Self-Alternating Theory, we dismantled the illusion of portable identity. We demonstrated that if you were transplanted into the life of a failed leader, a sex worker, a saint, or an elite athlete, you would not reform or master their world from an enlightened external perspective. You would either crumble under the weight of an alien context or absorb their exact trajectory. Part II extends this radical lens across the fundamental fault lines of human experience: relationships, race, geopolitics, physical embodiment, and the outer boundaries of species existence.                        The underlying principle remains absolute: we do not take our intact "I" into another person's reality. The reality reshapes, overwrites, or breaks the "I." Relational Systems: The Model Partner vs. The Toxic Household We routinely look at fractured marriages...

Names, Visions, and Imageries of the Crow tribe of Native Americans

Table of Contents The Crow: Who are they? Names, Visions, and Imageries Apsaalooke (or Absaroka) The Separations of the Bands The Mountain Crow (Ashalaho) The River Crow The Kicked in the Bellies Chiefs, Their Names and Meanings Chief Long Hair (Issheuhutskitu) Chief Sore Belly (Arapoosh) Chief of the Camp (Ashbacheeitche) Chief of Plenty Coups The rich cultural heritage of the Native Americans is subject to different interpretations beyond the actual meanings as understood by the natives. The Crow tribe’s names, visions, and imageries are not spared from these relative interpretations. It is claimed that these names, visions, and imageries denote exaggerations, triumphalism, or cultural symbolism. Also, their name can visually reveal the true meanings of descriptive language and metaphors or similes in words and expressions.   The objective of this writing is to examine these names and imageries to differentiate the Europeans’ interpretations of the names and lifestyle of the Cr...

The Kingdom of Prefixes: How Nigeria’s Obsession with Titles Masked Its Collapse

In most parts of the world, a name is a simple personal identifier. In Nigeria, a name is an architectural foundation: a heavy, load-bearing beam designed to carry as many honorifics, academic credentials, religious distinctions, and chieftaincy tags as humanly possible.   Consider the average Nigerian signature line: His Excellency, Chief Barrister, Dr. John Doe - GCFR, SAN, OBE. Or perhaps: Reverend Evangelist Dr. Professor Jane Doe - Chartered. Walk into any corporate boardroom, church sanctuary, or local council office, and you will meet men and women whose titles take longer to pronounce than their actual names. We have created a society where a person is not simply an engineer, an imam, or a retired civil servant; they are Engr. Alhaji Chief Ret. MD CEO.   Nigeria is a country overrun by titles. Yet, in a tragic irony, as the prefix and suffix lists grow longer, our public standards grow shorter. The Satirical Circus of Everyday Salutations The obsession has bec...