Skip to main content

“If God does not Exist, Everything is Permitted!” The Parody of Nigeria’s Political Landscape

Introduction

Ivan Karamazov’s haunting provocation: “If God does not exist, everything is permitted” was never meant as a simple denial of faith. It was a moral warning: without divine accountability, human beings may act without restraint. In Nigeria, this paradox has taken on a peculiar parody. Politicians loudly profess faith, whether Christian or Muslim, invoking God at rallies, quoting scripture in speeches, and embarking on pilgrimages. Yet their governance betrays a worldview where God’s existence has no binding consequence. Power itself becomes god, and accountability evaporates.

The irony is stark. A few days ago, the president ordered that police escorts protecting elites be withdrawn so officers could be redeployed to fight insecurity. Suddenly, politicians scrambled, fearful for their lives, lamenting exposure to danger. Yet ordinary Nigerians have lived exposed for decades: kidnapped on highways, massacred in villages, displaced from homes, and abandoned in camps. Citizens have been maimed and burnt while leaders enjoyed convoys of protection. The parody is complete: those who claim to know God behave as if He does not exist, enthroning themselves as gods instead.

Case Studies of Irony

Consider the security hypocrisy. For years, citizens have endured Boko Haram insurgency in the Northeast, banditry in the Northwest, farmer-herder clashes in the Middle Belt, and kidnappings across the South. Families sell land to pay ransom; children are abducted from schools; highways become death traps. Yet only when police escorts are withdrawn do elites suddenly discover insecurity.

Corruption and patronage deepen the parody. Billions of naira meant for road constructions, elections, hospitals and other development vanish into private pockets. Religious leaders are often co-opted to bless these regimes, lending divine legitimacy to secular greed.

Selective justice compounds the irony. Journalists, oppositions, and activists face arbitrary arrests under cybercrime laws, while politicians accused of graft enjoy immunity. Citizens are silenced, but elites are shielded.

Economically, the betrayal is relentless. Subsidy removals and inflation crush ordinary Nigerians, while leaders continue to enjoy foreign medical trips, luxury convoys, and inflated allowances. Citizens queue for fuel and food, but politicians feast at banquets.

Theological Reflection

Nigeria’s faith traditions emphasize justice, compassion, and stewardship. The Bible warns: “Woe to the shepherds who destroy and scatter the sheep of my pasture” (Jeremiah 23:1). The Qur’an commands: “God orders you to render trusts to whom they are due and judge with justice” (Qur’an 4:58). Yet leaders act as if divine accountability is irrelevant. They invoke God’s name but embody Ivan’s nihilism.

The parody is not disbelief but hypocrisy, faith reduced to ritual and rhetoric, stripped of moral consequence.

Social Reflection

Citizens live in perpetual insecurity. Villages are raided, highways unsafe, schools attacked. Communities normalize trauma: ransom payments, vigilante justice, displacement camps. Faith communities provide solace, but systemic neglect erodes trust in institutions.

The gap between elite fear and citizen suffering is glaring. When police escorts were withdrawn, politicians cried out. Yet for decades, citizens have cried unheard. The parody is social inequality sanctified by power.

Political Reflection

Nigeria’s democracy is hollowed by patronage, godfatherism, and elite self-preservation. Leaders scramble when privileges are threatened, revealing their detachment from citizen realities. Political rhetoric is saturated with religious language, but governance is secularized into self-worship.

The parody is clear: politicians enthrone themselves as gods, demanding loyalty while failing stewardship. They claim divine sanction but govern as if divinity is irrelevant.

Economic Reflection

Citizens bear the brunt of inflation, unemployment, and subsidy removals. Leaders continue to enjoy perks, such as foreign trips, luxury convoys, inflated allowances. Economic policies prioritize elite survival over citizen welfare.

The irony is sharp: leaders who claim divine sanction perpetuate economic structures that crush the vulnerable. Faith becomes a cloak for exploitation.

Comparative Ironies

Claimed Value

Political Reality

Impact on Citizens

God-fearing leadership

Rampant corruption and patronage

Erosion of trust, systemic poverty

Security for all

Elites shielded, citizens exposed

Kidnappings, killings, displacement

Justice and fairness

Repressive laws, arbitrary arrests

Shrinking civic space, fear culture

Stewardship of resources

Mismanagement of billions

Poor infrastructure, unemployment

Implications of Ivan’s Statement

Ivan’s provocation becomes prophetic in Nigeria. Leaders act as if God does not exist, permitting corruption, injustice, and abuse. Faith is reduced to ritual and rhetoric, stripped of accountability.

The parody is not atheism but functional atheism: professing God while governing as if He is absent. Citizens suffer because leaders embody Ivan’s nihilism while cloaked in religiosity.

Conclusion

If God exists, then justice, compassion, and accountability must be lived, not merely professed. Nigeria’s renewal demands leaders who embody faith through service, not self-deification.

The prophetic challenge is clear: Nigeria’s healing requires dismantling the parody, restoring governance as stewardship, not idolatry of power. Citizens must demand leaders who fear God enough to serve His people.

The vision is communal: a Nigeria where faith is not parody but practice, where leaders embody justice, and where citizens no longer live as sacrificial victims of insecurity and neglect. Only then will Ivan’s provocation be overturned, not by denial of God, but by the living witness of justice in His name.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Early Contacts between Christianity and Islam

Table of Contents Early Contacts between Christianity and Islam Monk Bahira The Migration to Axum Kingdom Christianity and Islam have always been two noxious bedfellows and yet always proclaim and wish peace on earth. It would not be a crass assumption to state that the two religions have over the centuries crossed paths and re-crossed paths many times. Crossing paths might have been in their ideologies, conflicts, doctrinal interpretations and even sharing some physical spaces. Therefore, in this brief writing, we will explore the early contacts between Christianity and Islam and see how they have influenced each other. Early Contacts between Christianity and Islam The early contacts between Christianity and Islam were not short of frames.  According to Kaufman et al., “frames are cognitive shortcuts that people use to help make sense of complex information.” They are means of interpreting our world and perhaps, the world of other people around us.  Such interpretations helpe...

The Connection between a Personal Name and Name Groups in Shawnee Social Organisation

Table of Contents Shawnee People The Divisions The Name Groups and Personal Names I’m always attracted to and interested in the culturally distinct and characteristic elements of different traditions or societies. Reading about the Shawnee people of Native American tribes is no different. I immediately fell in love with the linkage between Shawnee name groups and personal names. The name groups seem to present the Shawnee as a one-descent group with five major divisions. To examine this connection between a personal name and name group, a brief description of Shawnee will help in understanding the Shawnee social organisation. Shawnee People The term ‘Shawnee’ written in different forms ( Shaawanwaki, Shaawanowi lenaweeki, and Shawano ) is Algonquian like the archaic term ‘ shaawanwa ’ meaning ‘south.’ Thus, the term ‘Shawnee’ is (pronounced shaw-nee ) meaning the ‘southern people.’ The Shawnees are categorised as Algonquian-speaking North American Indian people whose pristine ho...

The Mace’s Vision: Universal Design, Inclusive design and Design for all

Overview Writing about universal design implies tracing back to the origin of the concept. In the 1970s, architect Ron Mace came up with the idea of universal design. Taking from his lived experience, as a wheelchair user, he understood the difficulties faced by people with disabilities as they try to move around buildings, roads, and public transport systems to mention but a few. He came up with the term “universal design” to characterize the importance of creating products and services that are beautiful, usable, and enjoyable by everyone, regardless of ability, age, or status in life. To continue his work, in 1997, The Center for Universal Design at North Carolina State University expanded Mace’s vision of the importance of designing inclusive environments for everyone. Universal design aims to create inclusive and equal access to resources, technology, or spaces for all users. How inclusive is universal design? To answer this question, we must examine the overall effect of...