Nigeria today stands at a
dangerous crossroads: either reform to restore legitimacy and justice or slide
irreversibly into the chaos of a failed state and the Hobbesian “state of
nature.”
Insecurity as the New Normal
Another day, another string
of kidnappings and killings. How long must this continue? Kidnappings and
killings have become routine across Nigeria. In November 2025, armed men
stormed Government Girls’ Secondary School in Kebbi State, killing the
vice-principal and abducting 25 students, while another raid on St. Mary’s
Catholic School in Niger State saw over 50 pupils and staff taken hostage.
Churches have been attacked, worshippers murdered, and ransom economies have
flourished. These are not isolated crimes but evidence of organized armed
groups acting as quasi-governments in ungoverned spaces.
Abuse of Power and Rule of Law
Nigeria’s institutions are
hollowed out by corruption. Analysts describe the crisis as one of state
legitimacy, where insecurity itself has become a profitable enterprise for
elites through “security votes” and procurement fraud. Amnesty International
estimates over 10,000 deaths in two years due to armed groups, while billions
vanish into corruption.
The United Nations stresses
that adherence to rule of law is vital for peace and development, linking
governance failures to Nigeria’s instability. The European Union warns against
complacency in protecting democracy, urging reforms to INEC and the judiciary.
These external voices echo what Nigerians already know: the state is failing in
its most basic duty of protection.
Double Standards in Justice: The Case of Nnamdi Kanu
The fate of Nnamdi Kanu,
leader of IPOB, sentenced to life imprisonment in November 2025, epitomizes
Nigeria’s double-standard justice. While separatist agitators in the Southeast
face the harshest penalties, northern bandits and insurgents, responsible for
mass killings and kidnappings, often receive lighter sentences or even
negotiated amnesty. This disparity deepens regional mistrust and fuels the
perception that justice in Nigeria is selective, harsher in the Southeast,
lenient in the North.
Nigeria Among Failed States
Nigeria scored 96.6 on the
Fragile States Index (2024), ranking alongside Libya and Afghanistan. Like
Somalia, where Al-Shabaab thrives amid weak governance, Nigeria’s bandits
exploit ungoverned spaces. The state’s inability to monopolize violence mirrors
collapses seen in Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Philosophical Lens: The State of Nature
When philosophers of the
Enlightenment theorized about the origins of political society, they imagined
what life would look like without the stabilizing force of government. Today,
Nigeria offers a living laboratory of those theories, not as abstract thought
experiments, but as daily realities for millions of citizens.
Hobbes: Fear and the Brutality of Survival
Thomas Hobbes, in Leviathan,
described the state of nature as a condition where life is “solitary, poor,
nasty, brutish, and short.” Nigeria’s insecurity mirrors this vision almost
perfectly. Villages in Kaduna, Zamfara, and Niger States live under constant
threat of bandit raids. Families sell farmland, livestock, and even their
children’s future in ransom payments to armed groups. The state’s monopoly on
violence has collapsed, leaving survival dependent on brute force or
negotiation with warlords. Hobbes argued that only a strong sovereign could
rescue humanity from this chaos. Nigeria’s weak military and fragmented police
force demonstrate the absence of such a sovereign, leaving citizens trapped in
perpetual fear.
Locke: The Betrayal of Natural Rights
John Locke believed that
even in the state of nature, individuals possessed inherent rights to life,
liberty, and property. Governments, he argued, exist to protect these rights.
Nigeria’s reality undermines Locke’s optimism. Property rights are routinely
violated: farmers in Benue and Plateau lose land to violent herders, while
urban dwellers see homes demolished without compensation under arbitrary
government orders. Justice is selective, Nnamdi Kanu, leader of IPOB, faces
life imprisonment for separatist agitation, while northern insurgents
responsible for mass killings often receive lighter sentences or negotiated
amnesty. This disparity illustrates Locke’s nightmare: a government that fails
to protect rights equally, eroding the very legitimacy of its social contract.
Rousseau: Inequality and Corruption as Social Decay
Jean-Jacques Rousseau warned
that the social contract could be corrupted by inequality and elite-driven
governance. Nigeria exemplifies this warning. Poverty maps reveal stark
disparities: for example, Sokoto records over 87% poverty, while the Southeast
averages 29%, notwithstanding that they receive higher or equal monthly federal
revenue allocation. Elites across regions enrich themselves through corruption,
siphoning billions from oil revenues and security budgets. Citizens see
politicians living in opulence while ordinary Nigerians endure unemployment,
inflation, and hunger. Rousseau argued that inequality breeds resentment and
fractures society; Nigeria’s widening gap between elite privilege and mass
suffering has already produced separatist movements, communal violence, and
distrust in the state.
Citizens Outside Civil Society
The cumulative effect of
Hobbesian fear, Lockean betrayal, and Rousseauian inequality is a Nigeria where
citizens increasingly live outside civil society. In rural zones, survival is
negotiated directly with armed groups, not through state institutions. Communities
form vigilante militias, negotiate ceasefires with bandits, or pay “taxes” to
insurgents. In urban centres, citizens rely on private security, bribes, or
ethnic networks rather than the police or courts. This is a textbook return to
the state of nature: the collapse of trust in government, the erosion of
rights, and the dominance of brute force.
Nigeria’s Philosophical Crossroads
Nigeria’s predicament is not
merely political, it is philosophical. The country is sliding back into the
very conditions that Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau warned against. Unless Nigeria
reforms its institutions, restores justice, and reclaims its monopoly on
violence, it risks becoming a modern embodiment of the state of nature: a
failed state where survival is negotiated daily, rights are disregarded, and
inequality corrodes the social fabric.
Conclusion
Nigeria’s scaling
preferences are stark: either reform to restore legitimacy, justice, and
rule of law, or continued back-peddling into anarchy. The disparity of
justice exemplified by Nnamdi Kanu’s life sentence, rampant insecurity, and
corruption suggest that without urgent transformation, Nigeria risks joining
Somalia and Afghanistan as a textbook failed state.
Comments