In the heart of Nigeria, where
the soil glimmers with mineral wealth and the air trembles with fear, a
question rises like dust from a forgotten road:
What does a government choose to protect, the veins of the earth or the pulse of its people?
This essay explores a troubling
paradox: while citizens face escalating violence, kidnappings, and terror, the
state appears more invested in safeguarding mineral resources than human lives.
Through policy choices, security deployments, and silence in the face of
tragedy, Nigeria’s prerogative seems increasingly tilted toward profit over
protection.
A Nation in Crisis
Nigeria’s security landscape is
fractured. From the forests of Zamfara, the farmlands of Benue and Nasarawa, to
the highways of Kaduna, Anambra, and Imo, citizens live under siege. Bandits
raid villages, terrorists strike with impunity, ‘unknown gunmen’ maraud both
day and night, and kidnappings have become a grim economy. In the first half of
2023 alone, over 3,000 people were killed and 1,500 abducted, many in regions
rich in gold, lithium, and other minerals. These zones, once fertile with
promise, now echo with gunfire and grief. The emotional toll is immeasurable:
families displaced, children orphaned, and trust in governance eroded.
Government Actions: Mining Marshals and Resource Protection
In response to rampant illegal
mining, the Nigerian government launched Mining Marshals, a specialized
force tasked with protecting mineral sites and curbing resource theft. While
this move signals a desire to formalize the mining sector and boost revenue, it
also reveals a troubling imbalance. Mining zones now receive targeted
protection, while many communities remain exposed to violence. The contrast is
stark: swift action to defend minerals, slow response to defend lives. This
prioritization raises a haunting question, has the state chosen commodities
over citizens?
The Ethical Rift: Citizens vs. Commodities
The ethical implications are
profound. When a government deploys elite forces to guard mineral resources but
hesitates to rescue kidnapped schoolchildren, it sends a message about value.
Citizens feel abandoned, their suffering sidelined by economic ambition. The
state’s silence in moments of mass tragedy, while vocally defending resource
interests, deepens the rift. It is not merely a policy failure; it is a moral
fracture. In choosing what to protect, the government reveals who it sees as
expendable.
Civic Stewardship and the Call for Reorientation
Nigeria must reorient its
priorities. Security must be people-centred, not profit-centred. This means
investing in community-led monitoring, transparent resource governance, and
inclusive security frameworks that honour both dignity and development.
Citizens must be empowered to shape the narrative, not as passive victims, but
as stewards of their land and lives. As EchoBeacon Civic Pulse envisions, every
civic echo should be reachable, every gesture narratable, and every policy
attuned to emotional and communal resonance. Let the soil yield wealth but
let the people live to tell its story.
Conclusion
Nigeria stands at a crossroads.
It can continue down a path where minerals are guarded and citizens are
forgotten, or it can choose a future where human life is sacred and security is
holistic. The prerogative is not just strategic, it is spiritual. In reclaiming
the pulse of the nation, Nigeria must ask not only what it protects, but who it
becomes. For in the rhythm of protection lies the soul of a people, and the
story of a nation yet to rise.
Comments