The language we use to describe
mass violence is never neutral. Words like genocide and pogrom
carry immense historical, legal, and moral weight. In Nigeria, where Christian
communities have endured repeated waves of violence, the debate over
terminology is not merely academic; it shapes international responses, frames
justice claims, and influences whether the world recognizes the urgency of
intervention. To understand Nigeria’s situation, we must situate it within the
long arc of history, comparing past pogroms and genocides, and examining how
international law defines these crimes.
Pogroms: Episodic Violence with Historical Roots
The term pogrom emerged
in Tsarist Russia in the late 19th century, describing mob attacks against
Jewish communities. These pogroms were often tolerated or encouraged by
authorities, leaving homes destroyed, synagogues desecrated, and thousands
displaced.
Example:
The Kishinev Pogrom of 1903 killed dozens of Jews, injured hundreds, and shocked the world with its brutality.
Pogroms were not systematic extermination campaigns; rather, they were localized explosions of hatred, designed to terrorize and marginalize communities.
In Nigeria, attacks on Christian
villages in Plateau, Benue, and Kaduna states often resemble pogroms. Armed
groups descend on communities, burning churches, killing civilians, and forcing
survivors to flee. These events are episodic, but their recurrence creates a
climate of fear and displacement like the pogroms of Eastern Europe.
Genocide: Systematic Extermination
By contrast, genocide is
defined by the 1948 UN Convention as acts committed with intent to destroy, in
whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. Genocide is
not just mass killing; it is a deliberate strategy of eradication.
Historical examples:
- The Holocaust (1941–1945), where Nazi Germany systematically murdered six million Jews.
- The Armenian Genocide (1915 –1917), where the Ottoman Empire targeted Armenians through mass killings and deportations.
- The Rwandan Genocide (1994), where Hutu extremists killed approximately 800,000 Tutsis in 100 days.
Genocide requires evidence of
intent. In Nigeria, Christian leaders such as the Christian Association of
Nigeria (CAN) argue that the scale and targeting of attacks amount to genocide.
They cite the destruction of villages, mass killings, and displacement as
evidence of a campaign to eradicate Christian presence in certain regions. Yet
international law demands proof of centralized intent,
Nigeria’s Violence in Context
Nigeria’s violence is complex,
involving multiple actors:
- Boko Haram and ISWAP: Islamist insurgent groups that explicitly target
Christians, churches, and schools. Their ideology and actions align more
closely with genocidal intent.
- Fulani militias and communal
clashes: Often framed as farmer-herder
conflicts, these attacks disproportionately affect Christian farming
communities. While devastating, they are frequently driven by land disputes,
appropriations and to some extent extermination campaigns, as some would argue.
- State weakness: Authorities often fail to prosecute perpetrators,
creating impunity that mirrors the tolerance of pogroms in Tsarist Russia.
Thus, Nigeria’s violence
oscillates between pogrom-like attacks and patterns that some argue amount to
genocide. The distinction lies in whether the violence is episodic or part of a
systematic plan to eradicate Christians.
International Law and Responsibility
Genocide Convention (1948): States are obligated to prevent and punish
genocide. Labelling Nigeria’s violence as genocide would trigger international
legal responsibilities and potential intervention.
Rome Statute of the ICC (1998): Recognizes genocide, crimes against humanity, and
war crimes. The pattern of violence in Nigeria more closely aligns with crimes
against humanity: marked by widespread or systematic attacks targeting
Christians, civilians, and vulnerable populations, and, if left unaddressed,
risks evolving into a full-scale genocide.
Moral responsibility: Regardless of legal definitions, the suffering of
Nigerian Christians demands recognition. History shows that failure to act
early allows pogroms to escalate into genocides. Kristallnacht in 1938, a
pogrom against Jews in Nazi Germany, foreshadowed the Holocaust. Nigeria’s
episodic violence could similarly foreshadow greater atrocities if unchecked.
Historical Comparisons and Insights
Kristallnacht vs. Plateau
attacks: Both involved targeted
destruction of religious sites and terrorizing communities.
Russian pogroms vs. Nigerian
village raids: Both were
episodic, tolerated by authorities, and designed to instil fear.
Rwanda vs. Nigeria: Rwanda’s genocide was centralized and
state-driven, while Nigeria’s violence is fragmented. Yet the scale of
displacement and killings in Nigeria raises alarms that history may repeat
itself.
Conclusion
The choice between calling
Nigeria’s violence a Christian genocide or a pogrom is not merely
semantic. Pogroms emphasize episodic terror, while genocide signals systematic
extermination. Nigeria’s reality contains elements of both: localized attacks
that cumulatively threaten the survival of Christian communities. International
law demands caution in terminology, but history warns that minimizing violence
risks enabling escalation. Whether labelled pogrom or genocide, the moral
imperative remains the same: urgent action to protect vulnerable communities,
ensure accountability, and prevent Nigeria’s tragedy from becoming another
chapter in humanity’s darkest history.
P.S. See: Modular Advocacy Toolkit: Addressing Violence Against Christians in Nigeria
Sources
“Is there a Christian Genocide in Nigeria” in The Conversation,
November 5, 2025. https://theconversation.com/is-there-a-christian-genocide-in-nigeria-evidence-shows-all-faiths-are-under-attack-by-terrorists-268929
accessed 20/11/2025
“CAN Reasserts claims of ongoing Christian Genocide
in Nigeria”, in Vanguard, Marie-Therese Nanlong, November 18,
2025. https://www.vanguardngr.com/2025/11/can-reasserts-claim-of-ongoing-christian-genocide-in-nigeria/
accessed 20/11/2025
“Nigeria: Christian Genocide or a Crisis of
narratives?” in DW, Abiodun Jamiu, November 3, 2025. https://www.dw.com/en/nigeria-christianity-genocide-religion-boko-haram/a-74421780
accessed 20/11/2025
“How did the Holocaust happen?” in The Holocaust
Explained, The Vienna Holocaust Library, https://www.theholocaustexplained.org/how-and-why/how/genocide-in-action-1941-1945/
accessed 20/11/2025.
Suny, R.G. "Armenian Genocide."
Encyclopedia Britannica, October 10, 2025. https://www.britannica.com/event/Armenian-Genocide.
Britannica Editors. "Rwanda genocide of
1994." Encyclopedia Britannica, September 24, 2025. https://www.britannica.com/event/Rwanda-genocide-of-1994.
Penkower, Monty Noam. "The Kishinev Pogrom of 1903: A Turning Point in Jewish History." Modern Judaism 24, no. 3 (2004): 187-225. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/172771.
Comments
The essay raises crucial concerns about the power of language in naming mass atrocities, and I agree that terms like pogrom, violence, genocide, and even holocaust are not neutral vocabulary—they shape global perception and determine whether the world pays attention or looks away. In Nigeria’s case, especially in Benue, Plateau, Kaduna, and several Middle Belt communities, these words are not merely academic labels. They describe lived realities of Christians who have endured repeated massacres, community erasures, and targeted destruction of worship centres.
While the article carefully distinguishes between episodic pogroms and the systemic intent required for genocide, the troubling pattern in Nigeria shows elements of both. The cyclical raids, the selective targeting of Christian enclaves, and the displacement of entire populations cannot be dismissed as ordinary “violence.” They reflect a deeper structure of persecution—one that risks sliding into full-blown genocide if not confronted. Words matter because they frame responsibility. Whether we call these events pogroms or genocide, the moral and legal urgency remains the same: Christian communities in Nigeria are under existential threat, and minimizing the terminology only emboldens perpetrators.
Ogbuke’s Cubicles’ Den.
---