Skip to main content

What can bring Peace? Open Grazing: An Invisible Violence in Nigeria

Overview

Open grazing practice is characteristically an invisible violence as well as a visible trigger of violence in Nigeria. It causes harm and violates people’s sense of security, belonging, and emotional postures because of the entrenched behaviours and by power wielding ruling elites. Watching several herds of cattle trooping along your farm is never a good sight. It is a distressing view. Immediately, it generates emotional disturbances, reveals the economic hegemony in the political sphere, engenders distrust, provokes frustration and remonstrate economic injustice in the system. It becomes impossible to exist as a citizen because such an invisible violence is irredeemable, and pervasive on one hand, and appears non-consequential on the other. 

Showing herds of cattle grazing in open field

Open grazing practice is also a visible trigger for violence.

The cattle eat or destroy farmers’ crops, the farmers chase the cattle away. The herders invade the farmers’ homes. The farmers and the herders engage in battles. The cattle die, farms are destroyed, homes are destroyed, and people are killed.

Persistent conflicts in Nigeria border around natural resources: land, water, forests, animals, and minerals. These natural resources, one can argue are the reasons for different calls for cessation of one or two ethnic groups from other ethnic groups that make up Nigeria.

This writing will follow this outline:

  1. What can bring Peace?
  2. Open Grazing and Ranching

1. What can bring Peace?

In Nigeria for example, farmers and herders have engaged in violent clashes that has resulted in more than 1300 deaths and about 300,000 have been displaced in their homes. The past administration just ‘stood back and stood by’ while lives were wasted, crops destroyed, and people became refugees in their own states in so-called ‘peace time.’ The effect is brutal. Because there was no security, farmers could not farm. Because farmers did not farm, there is no food in the entire country. Because there is no production of food, the entire country is hungry. Because there were no crops to sell, the treasury is empty.

To prevent this from happening and to proffer solutions, the national assembly in this current administration are about to pass a bill called: National Animal Husbandry and Ranches Commission sponsored by Senator Titus Tartenger Zam. The bill is meant to manage, regulate, and preserve cattle rearing and ranching in Nigeria. The bill also will prohibit open grazing in Nigeria and make it a punishable offence by the law. The bill equally will establish ranches in the states of origin of pastoralists.

In a visibly divided country like Nigeria, though, the bill is sternly criticised by some of the senators from the northern part of the country, it passed its second hearing and is now with the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Judiciary, and Legal Matters for reviews.

This move will help lessen or prevent the constant and violent clashes between the herders and farmers, stem other allied visible triggers of violence, such as heinous crimes (sporadic killings), religious bigotry and ethnic conflicts.

If the bill passes, Nigeria will have a ranching system of rearing livestock in the north, which exists already in southern Nigeria. In southern Nigeria, goats, sheep and cows are kept in pens and shelters. What are the differences between open grazing and ranching?

2. Open Grazing and Ranching

There are some major challenges and benefits associated with open grazing and ranching.

Free Movement and Land Use

In open grazing, cattle are allowed to freely move around a large, unprotected areas of land. This is known as natural pasture, but it is effective in regions with enormous vast swathes of countryside.

Ranching is the direct opposite of open grazing. In this case, cattle are secured within a designated vast swathe of land. The cattle are controlled and managed properly with supplementary feeding and care.

Animal Husbandry

In open grazing, the cattle are at the mercy of predators, diseases, and harsh weather conditions. Also, open grazing can help in spreading of cow diseases because infected cattle are not contained within to be properly monitored.

While ranching provides better protection and care for the cattle, including medical, shelter, warmth, and extra feeding.

Economic Factor

In open grazing, the herder does not need to construct fences, or shelters for the cattle. In essence, it costs nothing to have the cattle in open swathes of lands. But this practice exposes the herders to risks of losing their cattle or even having constant conflicts with other landowners.

Ranching on the other hand can be capital intensive. The herders would construct fences, shelters, and even employ staff to manage and feed the herds. But it has some benefits, this practice would produce healthier cattle, higher productivity, and prevent the corrosive use of the land.  

Environmental Factor

Open grazing can lead to overgrazing, degradation of natural vegetation, soil erosion, and conflicts with farmers for incursions into their lands.

While ranching will help protect the land, limit the areas of land that are exposed to soil erosion, and reduce environmental degradation.

Conflict Management

Open grazing is a visible trigger of violence. As such, it can lead to conflicts between herders and farmers over rights to land, water and vegetations. If cattle are in ranches, this will minimize the incessant conflicts between herders and farmers and encourage neighbourliness, peace and harmony.

As noted above, each practice has its benefits and challenges. But choosing the lesser evil is always a better option. The lesser evil is ranching, hence the Senate thought that the bill would bring peace between the herders and farmers, prevent killings, encourage farmers to go back to their farms to continue to feed the nation.

Summary

The following is a summary of the key points about ‘What can bring Peace? Open Grazing: An Invisible Violence in Nigeria’:

Open grazing practice is an invisible violence. It can also be a visible trigger of violence in Nigeria.

The new bill: The Senate has taken a bold step to challenge the status quo by proposing a bill known as National Animal Husbandry and Ranches Commission to manage, regulate, and preserve cattle rearing and ranching in Nigeria.

Open grazing and ranching: This writing pointed out some benefits and challenges of both practices but concludes that out of the two evils, ranching will help promote peaceful co-existence between the herders and farmers.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Principle of Causation in Igbo Folklore

Table of Contents The Breadfruit The Obi The Termites The Chicken The Kite The Gun The Blacksmith Death God, the Almighty The Igbo is one of the major tribes in Nigeria. Somewhere in ipostthisweek.com, the Igbo people have been described in different contexts as an entity in Nigeria. So, we are not going to spend time describing the people, society, and culture. The Igbo proverbs: ‘Mkpuru onye kuru n’okochi k’oga aghoro n’udu mmiri’ (literally, ‘the seed you sow in the dry season, you will reap in rainy season’ which means, ‘you reap what you sow’) and ‘ukwa rue oge ya, odaa’ (literally, ‘the breadfruit time arrives and it falls’ which means, ‘there is time for everything’) are causative expressions that everything is governed by simple laws of cause and effect. While another proverb: ‘ ihe onye metara o buru’ (literally, ‘whatever you do, you carry’ which means, ‘you are responsible for your actions’) is the karmic unraveling of its interpretation of crime and punishment or fatal...

The Alternative Self (Part IV): Beyond the Mechanics of Substitution

In Parts 1, 2, and 3 of The Self-Alternating Theory , we mapped the intricate mechanics of human positioning: how individuals continuously swap roles, situations, and existential stations within the architecture of society. We observed the relentless cycle of substitution: how power yields to vulnerability, how victims inherit the machinery of oppression, and how raw human drives alternate between expression and suppression. Yet, mapping the engine of alternation leaves a critical question unanswered: Are we permanently condemned to react to the swap, or can we consciously choose our orientation within it? This is where The Alternative Self emerges, not as a passive participant in life’s endless rotation, but as a deliberate act of internal sovereignty and transformation. Let’s break it down. Breaking the Compulsive Cycle Under the framework of The Self-Alternating Theory , human behaviour often appears deterministic. Bad leadership, tyranny, and destructive compulsions tend t...

Accessibility: from Philosophical Perspectives

Introduction This article aims to examine the concept of accessibility from some philosophical principles: Utilitarianism and the principle of ‘one and many.’ Doing this will bring to the fore the reason why accessibility is the cynosure of inclusivity. Understanding Accessibility Accessibility refers to the design of products, devices, services, or environments that are usable for everyone. It ensures that everyone, regardless of their abilities or limitations, can effectively interact with and benefit from a product, technology, environment, or service. The term ‘accessibility’ has its origin in French. It can be said to be borrowed from the French “ accessibilite ,” meaning “the quality of being able to be reached or accessed.” This French term might have been influenced by the late Latin accessibilis , from Latin accessus (past participle of accÄ“dere , meaning “to approach”, “to enter”, “to access”, or “to log in.” According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, the ...

Quietness, Provocation, and the Architecture of Human Presence: A Philosophical Dialogue and Leadership Insights

Introduction Human communication is not a single channel but a spectrum. On one end are the gadflies : provocateurs who stir societies and individuals into reflection. On the other end are the taciturn and laconic : those who speak little, or speak briefly, yet whose presence can be unmistakably strong. Understanding these modes of expression is essential for leadership, collaboration, and human connection. Quietness is not absence. Brevity is not passivity. Provocation is not hostility. Each reveals a different way of engaging with the world. This essay explores their meanings, origins, relationships, and significance, culminating in a philosophical dialogue and leadership-focused interpretation. The Gadfly A gadfly is someone who persistently challenges, questions, or provokes others, especially authority. They disrupt complacency and force reflection. Etymologically, gadfly is: Old English gad - spike, goad Fly - the insect that irritates horses. Put...

Echo-Collate: The Inevitable Vanguard of Electoral Integrity in Nigeria

In a modern democracy, the ballot box is the bedrock of legitimacy. Yet, for millions of Nigerians, the primary challenge of governance has long been ensuring that the votes cast at polling units faithfully reflect the results declared at collation centres. The introduction of the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) Result Viewing Portal (IReV) marked a watershed moment in Nigeria's electoral evolution, promising real-time transparency by making polling unit result sheets (Form EC8A) publicly accessible. However, as experience has demonstrated, a single institutional system, no matter how well-designed remains susceptible to technical bottlenecks, network downtime, server overloads, human delay, and trust deficits. Enter Echo-Collate ( collate.echobeacon.net ), built upon the robust infrastructure of EchoBeacon.net. Designed as an independent, real-time shadow and backup tooling framework for INEC’s IReV, Echo-Collate represents a technological response to Niger...