Skip to main content

The Religious Case for Accessibility

Let's talk about the religious case for accessibility.

The backdrop for a religious case for accessibility is the fact that many places of worship, churches, temples, mosques, and shrines have architectural and interactive barriers that put a divide between those with and without disabilities. Discussing this topic, this table of contents will be followed.

Table of Contents

Introduction

The religious case for accessibility focuses on digital products, services, and environments that are used by those who gather in prayer and worship.  

Religion here includes every ecclesial community, and organized religion, such as Christianity, Judaism, Islam, African religions, Sikhism, Buddhism, Shintoaism, Hinduism, Taoism, Bahai Faith, and Jainism to mention but a few. 

Currently, many religious organizations have not realized the need to integrate accessibility into their practices. Integrating accessibility will reduce or eliminate some design barriers, digital frictions, and environmental upheavals that people with disabilities encounter while accessing those places of prayer and worship.

a brown case with different religious designs showing carved images that are not only visual but also tactile.

The religious case for accessibility acknowledges that some religious organizations have different ways of understanding frameworks of disabilities which slightly differ from the known theoretical models of disability.

Theoretical Models of Disability

Different theoretical models of disability provide a variety of angles and frameworks to understand disability. Arguably, no model is comprehensive but links with other models to form a comprehensive framework for understanding disability. For example,

The Medical Model - considers disability as a ‘problem’ that belongs to the individual.

The Social Model – considers disability issues as a socially created problem and a question of the full integration of individuals into society.

The Biopsychosocial Model – attempts to account for the social and biomedical models of disability.

The Economic Model – considers disability from the perspective of an individual’s inability to engage in work.

The Functional Solutions Model – aims to remove, or at least reduce, the impact of the functional limitations of the body using some adaptive or assistive technologies.

The Social Identity or Cultural Affiliation Model – seeks to derive an individual’s identity from membership within an in-group of like-minded individuals.

The Charity Model – views people with disabilities as pitiful, and unlucky people who need help from other fortunate individuals.

These models paint pictures of how society responds to disability matters.

Though religious organizations are members of society, they operate on different truth assumptions about the relationship between the individual and their maker. Therefore, to better appraise the religious case for accessibility, this writing claims that a new theoretical model will help capture and invigorate the religious case for accessibility.

As a Christian, I will base the religious case for accessibility as coming from Jesus who according to Christian theology and belief, came to serve and not to be served. Thus, I view Jesus’ Model as a better theoretical model of a religious case for accessibility. Other religions can choose their religious leader as their model for accessibility.   

Jesus Model

Jesus' Model of disability is the belief that accessibility is a human attribute while disability is a privation. That is when society fails to provide the basic things that normally should be present. Jesus Model aims to eliminate all forms of barriers by providing the essentials needed for well-being. This model creates enabling environments for everyone regardless of their abilities.  

A typical example was the man who had waited for 38 years at the Pool of Bethsaida, John 5:2-9. The story goes this way:

‘Jesus came up to Jerusalem on one Jewish feast. In Jerusalem near the Sheep Gate, there is a pool with five colonnades, also known as Bethsaida in Hebrew. On these walkways lay a great number of the sick, and those with visual and physical impairments.

There was a man who had been there with a disability for thirty-eight years. When Jesus saw him lying there and realized he had spent a long time in this condition, He asked, “Do you want to get well?” “Sir,” the man with disability replied, “I have no one to help me into the pool when the water is stirred. While I am on my way to the pool, someone else goes in before me.” Then Jesus told him, “Get up, pick up your mat, and walk.” Immediately the man was made well, and he picked up his mat and walked away.”’

Jesus’ Model is not part of the charity model because Jesus did not consider the man in question as unfortunate but rather, he had no equal access to the Pool. Therefore, to make the Pool equitable in use, the man was provided with assistance (an attribute) to compete with those without disabilities. The Jesus’ Model addresses the privations in most houses of prayers and worship.

For congregants or worshippers with disabilities, accessibility improvements are a necessity so that everyone will have equal access to followership.

16 Ways to Improve Accessibility in Places of Worship

  1. Provide ramps and step options to enter the buildings.
  2. Provide good lighting and remove flickering lights.
  3. Provide enough heating or cooling systems depending on your climate.
  4. Provide convenient seating arrangements that do not single out those with disabilities.
  5. Reduce too much noise while speaking or preaching and minimize instances of confusing language.
  6. Avoid the use of unusual words, phrases, or jargon while addressing the people.
  7. Provide newsletters that are written in clear and simple text.
  8. Read or preach distinctly and audibly.
  9. Provide suitable sound insulation for better and healthier living.
  10. Provide those with hearing impairments with sign language to follow the preacher or readers.
  11. Provide captions for all live audio presentations.
  12. Provide live speeches or webcasts in text alternatives.
  13. Provide a visual text presentation that has a reasonable contrast ratio.
  14. Introduce different technologies in worship to help those using assistive technologies.
  15. Provide a technology that allows attendees to give offerings via apps instead of the traditional passing of collection purses or boxes pew by pew.
  16. Consider the amount of time, you keep the people in worship and be considerate of the aged, sick, and others with hidden disabilities.

These are the issues that Jesus’ Model addresses and liberates everyone from the ‘unconscious’ apathy of many religious organizations. It is referred to as an ‘unconscious’ apathy because some religious organizations may be motivated or interested in following Jesus’ Model but along the line, such noble intentions or motivations would dissipate either through lethargy or inaction.

The religious case for accessibility is about following Jesus’ Model which emphasizes that accessibility is a human attribute and everyone’s birthright. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Principle of Causation in Igbo Folklore

Table of Contents The Breadfruit The Obi The Termites The Chicken The Kite The Gun The Blacksmith Death God, the Almighty The Igbo is one of the major tribes in Nigeria. Somewhere in ipostthisweek.com, the Igbo people have been described in different contexts as an entity in Nigeria. So, we are not going to spend time describing the people, society, and culture. The Igbo proverbs: ‘Mkpuru onye kuru n’okochi k’oga aghoro n’udu mmiri’ (literally, ‘the seed you sow in the dry season, you will reap in rainy season’ which means, ‘you reap what you sow’) and ‘ukwa rue oge ya, odaa’ (literally, ‘the breadfruit time arrives and it falls’ which means, ‘there is time for everything’) are causative expressions that everything is governed by simple laws of cause and effect. While another proverb: ‘ ihe onye metara o buru’ (literally, ‘whatever you do, you carry’ which means, ‘you are responsible for your actions’) is the karmic unraveling of its interpretation of crime and punishment or fatal...

The Alternative Self (Part IV): Beyond the Mechanics of Substitution

In Parts 1, 2, and 3 of The Self-Alternating Theory , we mapped the intricate mechanics of human positioning: how individuals continuously swap roles, situations, and existential stations within the architecture of society. We observed the relentless cycle of substitution: how power yields to vulnerability, how victims inherit the machinery of oppression, and how raw human drives alternate between expression and suppression. Yet, mapping the engine of alternation leaves a critical question unanswered: Are we permanently condemned to react to the swap, or can we consciously choose our orientation within it? This is where The Alternative Self emerges, not as a passive participant in life’s endless rotation, but as a deliberate act of internal sovereignty and transformation. Let’s break it down. Breaking the Compulsive Cycle Under the framework of The Self-Alternating Theory , human behaviour often appears deterministic. Bad leadership, tyranny, and destructive compulsions tend t...

Accessibility: from Philosophical Perspectives

Introduction This article aims to examine the concept of accessibility from some philosophical principles: Utilitarianism and the principle of ‘one and many.’ Doing this will bring to the fore the reason why accessibility is the cynosure of inclusivity. Understanding Accessibility Accessibility refers to the design of products, devices, services, or environments that are usable for everyone. It ensures that everyone, regardless of their abilities or limitations, can effectively interact with and benefit from a product, technology, environment, or service. The term ‘accessibility’ has its origin in French. It can be said to be borrowed from the French “ accessibilite ,” meaning “the quality of being able to be reached or accessed.” This French term might have been influenced by the late Latin accessibilis , from Latin accessus (past participle of accÄ“dere , meaning “to approach”, “to enter”, “to access”, or “to log in.” According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, the ...

Quietness, Provocation, and the Architecture of Human Presence: A Philosophical Dialogue and Leadership Insights

Introduction Human communication is not a single channel but a spectrum. On one end are the gadflies : provocateurs who stir societies and individuals into reflection. On the other end are the taciturn and laconic : those who speak little, or speak briefly, yet whose presence can be unmistakably strong. Understanding these modes of expression is essential for leadership, collaboration, and human connection. Quietness is not absence. Brevity is not passivity. Provocation is not hostility. Each reveals a different way of engaging with the world. This essay explores their meanings, origins, relationships, and significance, culminating in a philosophical dialogue and leadership-focused interpretation. The Gadfly A gadfly is someone who persistently challenges, questions, or provokes others, especially authority. They disrupt complacency and force reflection. Etymologically, gadfly is: Old English gad - spike, goad Fly - the insect that irritates horses. Put...

Echo-Collate: The Inevitable Vanguard of Electoral Integrity in Nigeria

In a modern democracy, the ballot box is the bedrock of legitimacy. Yet, for millions of Nigerians, the primary challenge of governance has long been ensuring that the votes cast at polling units faithfully reflect the results declared at collation centres. The introduction of the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) Result Viewing Portal (IReV) marked a watershed moment in Nigeria's electoral evolution, promising real-time transparency by making polling unit result sheets (Form EC8A) publicly accessible. However, as experience has demonstrated, a single institutional system, no matter how well-designed remains susceptible to technical bottlenecks, network downtime, server overloads, human delay, and trust deficits. Enter Echo-Collate ( collate.echobeacon.net ), built upon the robust infrastructure of EchoBeacon.net. Designed as an independent, real-time shadow and backup tooling framework for INEC’s IReV, Echo-Collate represents a technological response to Niger...