Skip to main content

There isn’t God, otherwise, why has he not heard us?

Table of Contents

That was the cry of a teenager brooding and mourning the brutal massacres of women and children by armed men and women in their town. What does that mean? Well, it means that people are flaunting divine authority or moral law as if they are gods. It means that the objective rules or values have been thrown away, rejected, or ignored by many men and women. They can do whatever they want, and they often get away with it. There seems to be no ultimate accountability or judgment for their actions. They force their interpretation of freedom, purpose, and meaning of life on others.

The gods of our Time

Some might think that the teenager’s cry for help portends a scary or nihilistic view of the world. The teenager’s forlorn hope contends that there’s no God, hence, the chaos and anarchy in the world. In every corner of the earth, it appears that people have lost their sense of morality and compassion. Selfishness, indifference, violence, and insensitivity make rounds from one country to another and from one continent to another. There are killings, wars, conflicts, and diseases in reckless abundance.  

Some might disagree with this argument because they would like to put aside the idea of God for a short time to feel liberated and empowered by their humanity. Some of those people among whom might be the armed men and women who killed and maimed thousands of people in different countries. Such people consider any external constraints or expectations as non-existent.

They may argue that they are not slaves to any higher power or a cosmic plan but rather slaves to their whims and caprices or slaves to premeditated vengeful actions. They are slaves to their reckless ambitions, slaves to their inhumanity, and slaves to some venal potentates. They are not remorseful of their actions. They do not feel any compassion for the people. They do not regret their actions. They do not feel any guilt nor fear any repercussions or punishments. They appear like gods. Nevertheless, they are cowards who hide behind balaclavas, AK-47s, and tanks as they rehearse their potential and ignominies.

Cries from different Continents

The teenager’s forlorn cry does imply that anything goes or that nothing matters in our world. It does reveal that there are still the ‘untouchables’ in this stone age. As there are ‘political untouchables’ there are ‘economic and religious untouchables.’ The cry for help does mean that the entire world is insensitive or indifferent to the consequences of the actions of some political or religious leaders. Why would our world not hear the forlorn cry of the teenager? Why should we disregard her feelings and the right to exist?

One teenager cries for peace in Africa, and another cries for peace in the Middle East. One teenager wails for love in Europe and another wails for hope in America. One teenager groans for freedom in Asia, and another groans for faith in Australia. Their lamentations are different requests from the younger generation to the older generation to see reason and motivation to do the right things. Their tears of a lost world reveal the unrelenting domination of evil over good, wrong over right, and worthlessness over meaningfulness.

The armed men and women represent the callous and violent armed groups of this world in different countries. Some refer to them as terrorists, others call them nationalists, and yet others see them as supremacists. But in essence, they are an immoral, irrational, and insensitive lot who maraud other people in the name of God, faith, or nationalism.  

Their actions are reasons why the teenager believes that there is no God, and they play god when they impose their beliefs and preferences on other people. The worst part is that they live not their own lives but the lives of their masters. They live inauthentic and dishonest lives. To say that they are hypocritical is, to say the least.

Your Freedom and God

To the teenagers crying on different continents, there is God, and he listens. The mere fact that you think about morality and values the world once cherished is evidence that there is God and people who still believe that good must be always done and evil rejected; that right is better than wrong and that valuable actions are better than worthless actions. The idea of God places universal and absolute standards for everyone to follow or abide by. Only a few never-do-wells rely on their subjective and impulsive personal preferences, like the armed men and women who massacred children, women, and men in different towns and villages.  

There is God because of the freedom given to all, though some would take the freedom but reject the responsibility. Many people abuse this freedom because they know very well that God will not force them to do anything against their will or violate their conscience. Hence, there is a good conscience (people in this category are conscious of their moral goodness which guides their actions). There is a bad conscience (people in this category feel guilt or shame because of thinking or doing something wrong. The guilt the individual feels is from inside and not outside. In this category, you can find people with guilty, remorseful, and troubled consciences). There is an erroneous conscience (people in this category make decisions contrary to universal laws because they are ignorant of that law. In this category, you can find people with lax, scrupulous, perplexed, or pharisaic consciences). Each of these types of consciences has the freedom to exist alongside other consciences. And you know what, God respects that and allows everyone to make their own decisions.  

The decision to attack your town and kill thousands of children, women, and men was not made by God. It was made by those armed men and women. Do we blame God or the armed men and women? You can disagree with me on any part of this writing. Do you think that God does not listen or hear forlorn cries for freedom, hope, and love? 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: Power, Decay, and the Price of "My Turn"

Title: Emilokon or The Fable of the Termites Author: Joe Barnabas Genre: Political Satire / Literary Allegory In his latest work, Joe Barnabas delivers a biting, visceral exploration of a society in the throes of transformation, and perhaps, disintegration. Emilokon or The Fable of the Termites is not merely a story; it is a mirror held up to the face of modern leadership and the systemic "termites" that hollow out the foundations of our shared home. The Heart of the Fable The title itself, Emilokon , carries the weight of entitlement and historical destiny, while the subtitle provides the darker metaphor. Barnabas masterfully utilizes the image of the termite: a creature that consumes from the inside out, often unnoticed until the structure collapses. This serves as a hauntingly familiar representation of the creeping greed and administrative decay currently plaguing our world. Structure and Pace Spanning 36 meticulously crafted chapters, the book feels lik...

The Self-Alternating Theory (Part II): The Fractured Mirror of Context

In the first iteration of the Self-Alternating Theory, we dismantled the illusion of portable identity. We demonstrated that if you were transplanted into the life of a failed leader, a sex worker, a saint, or an elite athlete, you would not reform or master their world from an enlightened external perspective. You would either crumble under the weight of an alien context or absorb their exact trajectory. Part II extends this radical lens across the fundamental fault lines of human experience: relationships, race, geopolitics, physical embodiment, and the outer boundaries of species existence.                        The underlying principle remains absolute: we do not take our intact "I" into another person's reality. The reality reshapes, overwrites, or breaks the "I." Relational Systems: The Model Partner vs. The Toxic Household We routinely look at fractured marriages...

The Self-Alternating Theory: Why We Can Never Truly Be the Other

We live in a culture obsessed with the exercise of perspective-taking. We tell ourselves to "walk a mile in another person’s shoes," if our core self: our moral compass, our intellectual agility, our refined tastes, and our personal ethics remains intact during the journey. We imagine slipping into the lives of others like costume changes in a play: maintaining our internal "I" while operating the external machinery of someone else's life. The Self-Alternating Theory challenges this fundamental illusion. It posits a sobering premise: you cannot be the other, whether in their best or worst selves. If you were truly transplanted into another person’s existence: inheriting their exact neurobiology, trauma, muscle memory, history, and social incentives you would not reform their life from an enlightened, outside perspective. You would either collapse under the weight of an alien context or become the very thing you previously judged, admired, or misunderstood. ...

Who’s A Rebel? Camus’ The Rebel and the NigeriaSphere

In the contemporary Nigerian landscape, the word "rebel" is often weaponized by those in power. To the state, a rebel is a transgressor of the Cybercrimes Act, a "disturber of the peace," or an agent of destabilization. However, if we look through the eyes of Albert Camus, the 20th-century philosopher of the absurd, we find a different definition; one that validates the citizen’s cry for good governance not as an act of subversion, but as an act of profound affirmation. The Camusian "No": An Act of "Yes" Camus begins his treatise with a startlingly simple observation: "What is a rebel? A man who says no." But this "no" is not a denial of order. When a Nigerian citizen takes to social media to demand transparency or decry the absence of the rule of law, they are saying "no" to a specific limit that has been breached. Camus argues that in saying no, the rebel is simultaneously saying "yes" to the existen...

Accessibility: from Philosophical Perspectives

Introduction This article aims to examine the concept of accessibility from some philosophical principles: Utilitarianism and the principle of ‘one and many.’ Doing this will bring to the fore the reason why accessibility is the cynosure of inclusivity. Understanding Accessibility Accessibility refers to the design of products, devices, services, or environments that are usable for everyone. It ensures that everyone, regardless of their abilities or limitations, can effectively interact with and benefit from a product, technology, environment, or service. The term ‘accessibility’ has its origin in French. It can be said to be borrowed from the French “ accessibilite ,” meaning “the quality of being able to be reached or accessed.” This French term might have been influenced by the late Latin accessibilis , from Latin accessus (past participle of accēdere , meaning “to approach”, “to enter”, “to access”, or “to log in.” According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, the ...