Skip to main content

Calumet: peace-making and diplomatic object among the Comanche People


Table of Contents

What will bring us peace? Many often ask. For the Comanche of Native America, their belief and adulation of calumet is a trait our world should consider and if necessary, adopt moving forward. In this piece, a brief description of the Comanche people will guide us through examining why calumet is important in their society and tradition. It must be stated that calumet is not a tradition solely practised by the Comanche. Like most Native American tribes, they consider not only the symbolism of the calumet, but also its efficacy in uniting tribes, and warring people, or even can be a safe passage for an enemy if carried as an olive branch.

Comanche: Who are they?

The name Comanche comes from the word ‘Ute’ which means “anyone who fights the other all the time.” The word can also mean “the enemy.” For the Comanches, they call themselves “Nermurnuh” meaning the "true humans" or “the people.” The Comanches are known for their bravery and equestrian prowess. As legend has it, they fought off many Native Indian tribes as well as the European settlers in the Great Plains. Their being in contact with European settlers, especially the Spanish became the reason why they were skilled in horse riding, horse breeding and fighting on horseback.

The Comanches made their homes on the Great Plains which include Southwest Oklahoma, Texas, California, and New Mexico. Previously, the Comanches were part of the Wyoming Shoshone, but their belligerent way of life helped force them to the south as they pillaged and defeated other tribes and people (the Mexicans, the Spanish, and the Americans) on their way. Their notoriety on battlefields was obnoxious that the defeated in battlefields were shamed and some parts of their bodies, such as scalps were taken as trophies.  

Different Bands of the Comanches

The Comanches are divided into 5 big bands:

  •        Yamparika – they are the "root eaters” whose principal chief was Ten Bears (Parrawasamen) [1860-72].
  •        Kotsoteka – they are the “buffalo eaters” whose principal chief was Mow-way (1825-1886).
  •        Penateka – they are “honey eaters” whose general leader was Tosahwi, meaning the “White Knife” (1805/10-1878/80). He was regarded as a man of peace.
  •       Nokoni – they are “those who turn back” whose commander in chief was Kiyou, meaning “Horseback” (1805/1810-1888).
  •        Quahadis – the “antelopes” whose last chief was Quanah Parker (1845-1911). He was notable for his resistance to the European settlers.

As warriors, the Comanches were formidable groups in battles. As confident and accomplished horse riders, their conquests of different tribes and people were threats to those around them. Hence, the relevance and symbolism of the calumet.

Calumet: Peace-making and diplomatic object

The calumet is embedded in a ceremony among Native Americans as a means of trading between different bands or between tribes for food and other needs. The calumet is a “peace pipe” that can be used to communicate with the spirits through chanting, praying and puffing of smoke. The word “calumet” can be said to be an old French term, “chalemel” which means “reed.”

As noted by a French missionary, Father Jacques Marquette, the calumet had two usages: one type of calumet serves for war purposes and the other serves for peace purposes. So, the calumet can be a symbol of peace and a symbol of conquest. As such, one type can be an object of peace and diplomacy and the other type can be an object of religious services in war times.

The calumet is said to be made from hollow cane with an estimated length of 2 feet. It’s decorated with the long, beautiful feathers of birds, as well as the heads or necks of some birds. The calumet pipe bowls can be fashioned from a red stone or pipestone located in the Pipestone Quarry in Southwestern Minnesota. The stem so made from hollow cane is made to fit the bowl. The calumet is used to smoke tobacco as a way of making offerings to the spirits.  

Arguably, the warring communities of the Comanche might have adopted the calumet as an object of establishing peace among themselves, hence it is called the “Peace Pipe.” During the calumet ceremony, great things happen. Once the Peace Pipe is introduced, the people though different and unrelated become one people, one family. They make exchanges of gifts, as well as exchanges between men and women from different tribes. In that ceremony, men and women from different bands are allowed to associate with and even court one another.  

Not minding the tactlessness of the Comanches, hence their rampant battles with their neighbours and European settlers, the calumet at a time was seen by outsiders as a tool for unsolicited negotiation of safety. Hence, the calumet guarantees even people who are mortal enemies the assurance that they are safe especially when they carry the calumets. The power and influence of the calumet pushed the European settlers to adopt the habit of smoking pipes as a way of acknowledging and recognising the people’s culture and submitting to their protégé.

The calumet can be said to be a tool used for prayers, to placate and communicate with the spirits. It can also be considered an object of peace and diplomacy. Whichever way the calumet is understood, it is an ordinary man-made object that is associated with religious meaning and significance not only to the Comanches and Native Americans but also to European settlers.     

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NigeriaSphere: A Definition!

At its core, NigeriaSphere is the collective resonance of the Nigerian identity, transcending geography, ethnicity, and time. It is the "Kpim" (to borrow the popular concept of Pantaleon Iroegbu) , the ontological heartbeat of a people whose spirit is no longer confined to a landmass but exists wherever the Nigerian consciousness interacts with the world. The Ontological Framework NigeriaSphere operates as a dual philosophical process: Terminus ad Quo (The Point of Origin): It represents the shared history, the "Nigerian condition," and the cultural bedrock from which every citizen and diaspora member emerges. It is the ancestral "why." Terminus ad Quem (The Point of Destination): It is the aspirational goal of nationhood. It is the destination where the Nigerian identity is refined into a standard of excellence, equity, and peace. In this sense, NigeriaSphere is not a static place, but a kinetic journey toward...

Trinity and Tawhid – The Same or Unique?

Table of Contents God/god Explained Same or Unique? Trinity and Tawhid: Synonyms and Polysemy Conclusion The concept of monotheism is the belief that there is only one God. It is a concept of theism that specifies itself as distinct from other theisms, such as polytheism, ditheism, or tritheism. The concept of monotheism is distinctive and accepts indivisibility while maintaining the uniqueness of God. The question that comes to mind is: who is this God? What about Him? The Christians, with a few exceptions, agree that “there are three persons in one God, God the Father, God, the Son and God, the Holy Spirit.” Therefore, Christians profess that God is a Trinity, which is the focal point of the Christian concept of monotheism. When compared to Islam, it is completely a different understanding. For Muslims, “there is no god but God, and Muhammad is the prophet of God.” This is normally put in this way: “ašhadu ʾan lā ʾilāha ʾilla -llāhu, wa-ʾašhadu ʾanna muḥammadan rasūlu -llāh,” that i...

Who’s A Rebel? Camus’ The Rebel and the NigeriaSphere

In the contemporary Nigerian landscape, the word "rebel" is often weaponized by those in power. To the state, a rebel is a transgressor of the Cybercrimes Act, a "disturber of the peace," or an agent of destabilization. However, if we look through the eyes of Albert Camus, the 20th-century philosopher of the absurd, we find a different definition; one that validates the citizen’s cry for good governance not as an act of subversion, but as an act of profound affirmation. The Camusian "No": An Act of "Yes" Camus begins his treatise with a startlingly simple observation: "What is a rebel? A man who says no." But this "no" is not a denial of order. When a Nigerian citizen takes to social media to demand transparency or decry the absence of the rule of law, they are saying "no" to a specific limit that has been breached. Camus argues that in saying no, the rebel is simultaneously saying "yes" to the existen...

Same-Sex Marriage in Igbo Cultural Traditions

Table of Contents The Igbo Tribe Same-Sex Marriage – Definition & Brief History Same-Sex Marriage in Igbo Cultural Traditions Conclusion This writing claims that same-sex marriage in Igbo culture is necessary, an improvisation, and a  ‘like with like’  construal. By construal, it places Igbo same-sex marriage in a social psychological context and views an individual as finding out ways or means to understand and interpret his-her surroundings, and the behaviour and actions of the people around and towards him-her. The reason for this claim is not far-fetched. The Igbo Tribe The Igbo is a major ethnic group in Nigeria with an estimated population of about 32 million. It is one of the largest in Africa adding to 18% of the total 177 million people of Nigeria. Igbo land consists of Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu, and Imo states of Nigeria. However, Igbos can be found in these other states of Nigeria: Rivers, Delta, Akwa Ibom, and Cross River. Outside of Nigeria, the Igbo tribe ...

How the Christians perceived Islam, Prophet Muhammad and Muslims from the 8th to the 15th Centuries – Part 1

Introduction The early and medieval Christians have no theological or legal (in terms of biblical) perspectives in their perceptions of Islam, Prophet Muhammad and Muslims. Contrary to the Qur’an and Muslims who theologically, and legally perceived Christians and Christianity perhaps because of Christianity’s antecedents. Islam theologically presented a series of quandaries to early and medieval Christianity, such that some of them viewed Muslim's as pagans and some as heretics or schismatics. The Christian polemicists hardly used the term Islam or Muslim to identify their rivalry, instead, the preferences to terms such as ‘Saracens, Hagarenes, Arabs, Turks, Pagans, Moors or simply, those who follow the Law of Muhammad’ were prevalent. This writing aims to examine by typologies, the polemics of Christians that cover from the 8th century to the 15th century and discussing Christianity's arguments from the perspectives of:   St. John Damascene (675-753) Heresy and Heresia...