Skip to main content

The Muslims' Perceptions of Christianity


Table of Contents

The Muslims’ perceptions of Christianity have always been based on the fundamental principle of Islam, that is, there is no god but God and Muhammad is the prophet of God. Every argument takes bearing from the fundamental belief of the indivisibility of God. Below is a brief description of how Muslims perceive Christianity.

From the Qur’an

The Qur’an objects to the idea of God being one but in three persons – Father, Son and the Holy Spirit. It does not acknowledge the Trinity, and it extends to Christianity’s doctrine of the Incarnation and as such, the authenticity of the Bible. As described elsewhere in this blog about the nature of Jesus, the Islamic theological and scriptural understanding of the nature of Jesus are unique when compared to Christianity.

The Muslim polemics about the oneness of God, the Sonship of Jesus and the authenticity of the Bible can be better described in the Second-century discourse between Caliph al-Mahdi and Patriarch Timothy, leader of the Nestorian Church (164-208). It goes this way.

The Being of God Himself

For Caliph al-Mahdi, the doctrine of the Trinity suggests three distinct beings who can be separated and cannot be equal. He argues that the relationship between God and Jesus Christ implies that the Father begot the Son physically and that there was a relationship between the Eternal and one born in time, and thus objects that Jesus’ human traits and actions prohibit his being divine and that the Divinity came under the control of men when Christ was crucified. He continues and argues that the Christian scriptures were altered hence, there is no place in it where the coming of the prophet Muhammad was predicted and suspects that the scriptures were corrupted. Caliph al-Mahdi found no reason not to believe in how the Qur’an constructed Christianity (Al-Taubah 9:30-31; Al-Ikhlas 112).

The Polemics against the Trinity

In the third century, the Arabic philosopher Abu Yusuf Ya‘qub b. Ishaq al-Kindi introduced the Aristotelian logic to disprove the doctrine of the Trinity. In On First Philosophy which comprises four sections, he dealt with issues, such as the honouring of Greek love of wisdom, the eternity of the world and the existence of one true God. It is in his third and fourth sections of On First Philosophy that he argues that God is the originator and source of unity in all other things, and human language is inapplicable to him.

Another argument came from a ‘convert’, al-Tabari. He tried to expose the inconsistencies between the Bible and the Nicene Creed in his Radd ‘ala al-Nasara. He reread the Bible to give some predictions that include Muhammad in the Bible in his Kitab al-din wa-al-dawla.

Zaydi Imam al-Qasim Ibn Ibrahim’s (d. 246) Radd‘ala al-Nasara, reveals how he was influenced by Christianity. He argues that God is not like or similar to any of his creations but acknowledges God’s goodness and generosity as divine attributes. That was a refutation of the idea that God has a begotten Son and that his Son is the image of him.

The Influence of Kalam

In the third century, Islamic theological reasoning was maturing into a somewhat systematic discipline that was methodological. Its leaders were thinkers, such as the Mu‘tazila.

The Mu‘tazila referred to themselves as Ahl al-tawhid wa-al‘adl (the People of God’s Unity and Justice). During these periods, the concentration of Qur’anic and Muslim polemics was on the doctrines of the Trinity and the divinity of Jesus as against the oneness of God and the humanity of Jesus.

Conclusion

Like I said at the beginning that this will be a brief account of how Muslims perceive Christianity. The Qur’anic and Muslims’ perceptions of Christianity and Christians are principally attacks on the Christian concept of monotheism and the divinity accorded to Christ as the Son of God and second person of the Trinity. The attacks against Trinity sound like a projection and defence of their concept of Tawhid and the message of the prophet Muhammad.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Nigeria is OK with NDC, Do We Need the Alternating Anonymity of the ADC or the Traumatised Society of the APC?

The socio-political landscape of Nigeria has long been a theatre of acronyms, where three-letter combinations carry the weight of destiny, identity, and despair. As the nation pivots toward the 2027 general elections, the usual cynicism is being met with a complex, psychological realignment. The emerging coalition of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) presents itself as a structured consolidation: a promise of institutional realignment, ideological clarity, and programmatic stability. It asks a fractured populace to believe, if only tentatively, that things could finally be "OK." Yet, this proposition does not exist in a vacuum. It forces an intersection with two other distinct psychological and structural paradigms currently vying for the soul of the electorate: the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). To understand the 2027 trilemma is to look beyond campaign manifestos and examine the deeper, systemic conditions these entit...

Africa - A Polyglot Continent

  Table of Contents European Languages - Uniting different African Tongues The distribution of European and Arabic languages in Africa At face value, one can argue that the African continent appears to be the middle of Europe; hence every major European country has a hold on her from the perspective of  lingua franca . It is a given that an African is a polyglot coming from the African continent. Every African can boast of speaking more than one or two European languages; and if you count Arabic, that makes it three. The reason for this assumption is that there are many native African languages that they must cope with in their different countries. European Languages - Uniting different African Tongues It is pertinent to point out here that the European languages have helped bring many Africans together, at least to the point of having a vehicle of common means of communicating among themselves. The European languages have helped in that regard, but it has also deprived them o...

Book Review: Power, Decay, and the Price of "My Turn"

Title: Emilokon or The Fable of the Termites Author: Joe Barnabas Genre: Political Satire / Literary Allegory In his latest work, Joe Barnabas delivers a biting, visceral exploration of a society in the throes of transformation, and perhaps, disintegration. Emilokon or The Fable of the Termites is not merely a story; it is a mirror held up to the face of modern leadership and the systemic "termites" that hollow out the foundations of our shared home. The Heart of the Fable The title itself, Emilokon , carries the weight of entitlement and historical destiny, while the subtitle provides the darker metaphor. Barnabas masterfully utilizes the image of the termite: a creature that consumes from the inside out, often unnoticed until the structure collapses. This serves as a hauntingly familiar representation of the creeping greed and administrative decay currently plaguing our world. Structure and Pace Spanning 36 meticulously crafted chapters, the book feels lik...

The Self-Alternating Theory (Part II): The Fractured Mirror of Context

In the first iteration of the Self-Alternating Theory, we dismantled the illusion of portable identity. We demonstrated that if you were transplanted into the life of a failed leader, a sex worker, a saint, or an elite athlete, you would not reform or master their world from an enlightened external perspective. You would either crumble under the weight of an alien context or absorb their exact trajectory. Part II extends this radical lens across the fundamental fault lines of human experience: relationships, race, geopolitics, physical embodiment, and the outer boundaries of species existence.                        The underlying principle remains absolute: we do not take our intact "I" into another person's reality. The reality reshapes, overwrites, or breaks the "I." Relational Systems: The Model Partner vs. The Toxic Household We routinely look at fractured marriages...

The Self-Alternating Theory: Why We Can Never Truly Be the Other

We live in a culture obsessed with the exercise of perspective-taking. We tell ourselves to "walk a mile in another person’s shoes," if our core self: our moral compass, our intellectual agility, our refined tastes, and our personal ethics remains intact during the journey. We imagine slipping into the lives of others like costume changes in a play: maintaining our internal "I" while operating the external machinery of someone else's life. The Self-Alternating Theory challenges this fundamental illusion. It posits a sobering premise: you cannot be the other, whether in their best or worst selves. If you were truly transplanted into another person’s existence: inheriting their exact neurobiology, trauma, muscle memory, history, and social incentives you would not reform their life from an enlightened, outside perspective. You would either collapse under the weight of an alien context or become the very thing you previously judged, admired, or misunderstood. ...