Skip to main content

The Muslims' Perceptions of Christianity


Table of Contents

The Muslims’ perceptions of Christianity have always been based on the fundamental principle of Islam, that is, there is no god but God and Muhammad is the prophet of God. Every argument takes bearing from the fundamental belief of the indivisibility of God. Below is a brief description of how Muslims perceive Christianity.

From the Qur’an

The Qur’an objects to the idea of God being one but in three persons – Father, Son and the Holy Spirit. It does not acknowledge the Trinity, and it extends to Christianity’s doctrine of the Incarnation and as such, the authenticity of the Bible. As described elsewhere in this blog about the nature of Jesus, the Islamic theological and scriptural understanding of the nature of Jesus are unique when compared to Christianity.

The Muslim polemics about the oneness of God, the Sonship of Jesus and the authenticity of the Bible can be better described in the Second-century discourse between Caliph al-Mahdi and Patriarch Timothy, leader of the Nestorian Church (164-208). It goes this way.

The Being of God Himself

For Caliph al-Mahdi, the doctrine of the Trinity suggests three distinct beings who can be separated and cannot be equal. He argues that the relationship between God and Jesus Christ implies that the Father begot the Son physically and that there was a relationship between the Eternal and one born in time, and thus objects that Jesus’ human traits and actions prohibit his being divine and that the Divinity came under the control of men when Christ was crucified. He continues and argues that the Christian scriptures were altered hence, there is no place in it where the coming of the prophet Muhammad was predicted and suspects that the scriptures were corrupted. Caliph al-Mahdi found no reason not to believe in how the Qur’an constructed Christianity (Al-Taubah 9:30-31; Al-Ikhlas 112).

The Polemics against the Trinity

In the third century, the Arabic philosopher Abu Yusuf Ya‘qub b. Ishaq al-Kindi introduced the Aristotelian logic to disprove the doctrine of the Trinity. In On First Philosophy which comprises four sections, he dealt with issues, such as the honouring of Greek love of wisdom, the eternity of the world and the existence of one true God. It is in his third and fourth sections of On First Philosophy that he argues that God is the originator and source of unity in all other things, and human language is inapplicable to him.

Another argument came from a ‘convert’, al-Tabari. He tried to expose the inconsistencies between the Bible and the Nicene Creed in his Radd ‘ala al-Nasara. He reread the Bible to give some predictions that include Muhammad in the Bible in his Kitab al-din wa-al-dawla.

Zaydi Imam al-Qasim Ibn Ibrahim’s (d. 246) Radd‘ala al-Nasara, reveals how he was influenced by Christianity. He argues that God is not like or similar to any of his creations but acknowledges God’s goodness and generosity as divine attributes. That was a refutation of the idea that God has a begotten Son and that his Son is the image of him.

The Influence of Kalam

In the third century, Islamic theological reasoning was maturing into a somewhat systematic discipline that was methodological. Its leaders were thinkers, such as the Mu‘tazila.

The Mu‘tazila referred to themselves as Ahl al-tawhid wa-al‘adl (the People of God’s Unity and Justice). During these periods, the concentration of Qur’anic and Muslim polemics was on the doctrines of the Trinity and the divinity of Jesus as against the oneness of God and the humanity of Jesus.

Conclusion

Like I said at the beginning that this will be a brief account of how Muslims perceive Christianity. The Qur’anic and Muslims’ perceptions of Christianity and Christians are principally attacks on the Christian concept of monotheism and the divinity accorded to Christ as the Son of God and second person of the Trinity. The attacks against Trinity sound like a projection and defence of their concept of Tawhid and the message of the prophet Muhammad.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NigeriaSphere: A Definition!

At its core, NigeriaSphere is the collective resonance of the Nigerian identity, transcending geography, ethnicity, and time. It is the "Kpim" (to borrow the popular concept of Pantaleon Iroegbu) , the ontological heartbeat of a people whose spirit is no longer confined to a landmass but exists wherever the Nigerian consciousness interacts with the world. The Ontological Framework NigeriaSphere operates as a dual philosophical process: Terminus ad Quo (The Point of Origin): It represents the shared history, the "Nigerian condition," and the cultural bedrock from which every citizen and diaspora member emerges. It is the ancestral "why." Terminus ad Quem (The Point of Destination): It is the aspirational goal of nationhood. It is the destination where the Nigerian identity is refined into a standard of excellence, equity, and peace. In this sense, NigeriaSphere is not a static place, but a kinetic journey toward...

Trinity and Tawhid – The Same or Unique?

Table of Contents God/god Explained Same or Unique? Trinity and Tawhid: Synonyms and Polysemy Conclusion The concept of monotheism is the belief that there is only one God. It is a concept of theism that specifies itself as distinct from other theisms, such as polytheism, ditheism, or tritheism. The concept of monotheism is distinctive and accepts indivisibility while maintaining the uniqueness of God. The question that comes to mind is: who is this God? What about Him? The Christians, with a few exceptions, agree that “there are three persons in one God, God the Father, God, the Son and God, the Holy Spirit.” Therefore, Christians profess that God is a Trinity, which is the focal point of the Christian concept of monotheism. When compared to Islam, it is completely a different understanding. For Muslims, “there is no god but God, and Muhammad is the prophet of God.” This is normally put in this way: “ašhadu ʾan lā ʾilāha ʾilla -llāhu, wa-ʾašhadu ʾanna muḥammadan rasūlu -llāh,” that i...

Who’s A Rebel? Camus’ The Rebel and the NigeriaSphere

In the contemporary Nigerian landscape, the word "rebel" is often weaponized by those in power. To the state, a rebel is a transgressor of the Cybercrimes Act, a "disturber of the peace," or an agent of destabilization. However, if we look through the eyes of Albert Camus, the 20th-century philosopher of the absurd, we find a different definition; one that validates the citizen’s cry for good governance not as an act of subversion, but as an act of profound affirmation. The Camusian "No": An Act of "Yes" Camus begins his treatise with a startlingly simple observation: "What is a rebel? A man who says no." But this "no" is not a denial of order. When a Nigerian citizen takes to social media to demand transparency or decry the absence of the rule of law, they are saying "no" to a specific limit that has been breached. Camus argues that in saying no, the rebel is simultaneously saying "yes" to the existen...

Same-Sex Marriage in Igbo Cultural Traditions

Table of Contents The Igbo Tribe Same-Sex Marriage – Definition & Brief History Same-Sex Marriage in Igbo Cultural Traditions Conclusion This writing claims that same-sex marriage in Igbo culture is necessary, an improvisation, and a  ‘like with like’  construal. By construal, it places Igbo same-sex marriage in a social psychological context and views an individual as finding out ways or means to understand and interpret his-her surroundings, and the behaviour and actions of the people around and towards him-her. The reason for this claim is not far-fetched. The Igbo Tribe The Igbo is a major ethnic group in Nigeria with an estimated population of about 32 million. It is one of the largest in Africa adding to 18% of the total 177 million people of Nigeria. Igbo land consists of Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu, and Imo states of Nigeria. However, Igbos can be found in these other states of Nigeria: Rivers, Delta, Akwa Ibom, and Cross River. Outside of Nigeria, the Igbo tribe ...

How the Christians perceived Islam, Prophet Muhammad and Muslims from the 8th to the 15th Centuries – Part 1

Introduction The early and medieval Christians have no theological or legal (in terms of biblical) perspectives in their perceptions of Islam, Prophet Muhammad and Muslims. Contrary to the Qur’an and Muslims who theologically, and legally perceived Christians and Christianity perhaps because of Christianity’s antecedents. Islam theologically presented a series of quandaries to early and medieval Christianity, such that some of them viewed Muslim's as pagans and some as heretics or schismatics. The Christian polemicists hardly used the term Islam or Muslim to identify their rivalry, instead, the preferences to terms such as ‘Saracens, Hagarenes, Arabs, Turks, Pagans, Moors or simply, those who follow the Law of Muhammad’ were prevalent. This writing aims to examine by typologies, the polemics of Christians that cover from the 8th century to the 15th century and discussing Christianity's arguments from the perspectives of:   St. John Damascene (675-753) Heresy and Heresia...