Skip to main content

Advent: God’s Chosen People and God’s Gentile Pagans

Image
iPost Team,

In Christ, Jesus is the reconciliation of the idea of God’s Chosen People and God’s Gentile Pagans. This is the general theme of this Second Sunday’s readings of Advent.

Before Christ, there was this separation between the two. But it is not godly to suggest that between the chosen people and gentile pagans God had favourites. Of course, in different contexts, such as the Virgin Mary found favour in God’s eye does suggest that she was favoured by God among other women. In her case, she was prepared from time to play the mediatrix, and to be the mother of the ‘Son of God’. According to Saint Paul:

For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren. Moreover, whom He predestined, these He also called; whom He called, these He also justified; and whom He justified, these He also glorified (Romans 8:29-30).

We see such favour in the case of Abraham whom God called out from his home, from among his people and land and asked to go to an unknown land where God wished to show him. With such a leap of faith, Abraham left everything and became the founder and father of God’s Chosen People through faith. The irony here is that though they were the chosen of God, they were to live and suffer in alien lands among the pagan nations for many years.

While in alien lands and among pagan nations, God did not abandon them. He continually sent them kings after his heart and some who took matters into their own hands; he sent them prophets and judges up until he finally sent his only Son. He is the true image of God, the true prince, who will reign not only on God’s favourites but also on gentile pagans as he sets up a kingdom of peace.

To ensure that this dichotomy between God’s chosen people and gentile pagans is breached, God prepared a precursor, a forerunner in the person of John the Baptist to prepare the minds of both God’s favourites and the gentile pagans.

God prepared John in a style beyond human comprehension. His aged parents were to conceive him. His father was made dumb at the thought of his having a baby. While in the womb, John leapt for joy when his mother, Elizabeth heard the greetings of Mary. And his name, John was given by an angel.

John became that voice that cries in the wilderness and drew many, God’s favourites as well as the pagans to himself for baptism of repentance.  

While Abraham prepared God’s beloved people to expect for a messiah many years before his coming, John also prepared both God’s beloved people and gentiles for the same Messiah. The only difference between Abraham and John is that Abraham did not know or see him. John knew and saw him. Abraham knew only God’s chosen people. John knew and saw both God’s beloved people and gentile pagans.   

Almost 2000 years since Jesus died 33 A.D, and we expect his Second Coming, the division in our world is beyond the God’s chosen people and gentile pagans divide. There are divisions in every aspect of human society. I do not write about the natural divisions that make our world beautiful, such as the contraries: white/black, left/right, up/down, low/high, night/day and so on. These divisions are like spices that jazz up our world. The division that has engulfed our world is tied to hatred, intolerance, bigotry, injustice, opposition to God, indifference, and greed.  

Thus, on this Advent period whether you see yourself as God’s favourite or a gentile pagan remember that everything is reconciled in Christ Jesus. Consider yourself as an instrument of love, where hatred has taken root; wield the mace of forbearance where prejudice reigns; be ready to tear down the walls of bigotry with appeals of clemency; be the ‘lady’ justice of hope to all wallowing in unjust treatments; become a soldier of truth as opposed to violence in the name of God; prevent cruelty and share with the poor and needy.  

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who’s A Rebel? Camus’ The Rebel and the NigeriaSphere

iPost Team,
In the contemporary Nigerian landscape, the word "rebel" is often weaponized by those in power. To the state, a rebel is a transgressor of the Cybercrimes Act, a "disturber of the peace," or an agent of destabilization. However, if we look through the eyes of Albert Camus, the 20th-century philosopher of the absurd, we find a different definition; one that validates the citizen’s cry for good governance not as an act of subversion, but as an act of profound affirmation. The Camusian "No": An Act of "Yes" Camus begins his treatise with a startlingly simple observation: "What is a rebel? A man who says no." But this "no" is not a denial of order. When a Nigerian citizen takes to social media to demand transparency or decry the absence of the rule of law, they are saying "no" to a specific limit that has been breached. Camus argues that in saying no, the rebel is simultaneously saying "yes" to the existen...
Post a Comment
Continue reading »

The Self-Alternating Theory: Why We Can Never Truly Be the Other

iPost Team,
We live in a culture obsessed with the exercise of perspective-taking. We tell ourselves to "walk a mile in another person’s shoes," if our core self: our moral compass, our intellectual agility, our refined tastes, and our personal ethics remains intact during the journey. We imagine slipping into the lives of others like costume changes in a play: maintaining our internal "I" while operating the external machinery of someone else's life. The Self-Alternating Theory challenges this fundamental illusion. It posits a sobering premise: you cannot be the other, whether in their best or worst selves. If you were truly transplanted into another person’s existence: inheriting their exact neurobiology, trauma, muscle memory, history, and social incentives you would not reform their life from an enlightened, outside perspective. You would either collapse under the weight of an alien context or become the very thing you previously judged, admired, or misunderstood. ...
Post a Comment
Continue reading »

The Self-Alternating Theory (Part II): The Fractured Mirror of Context

iPost Team,
In the first iteration of the Self-Alternating Theory, we dismantled the illusion of portable identity. We demonstrated that if you were transplanted into the life of a failed leader, a sex worker, a saint, or an elite athlete, you would not reform or master their world from an enlightened external perspective. You would either crumble under the weight of an alien context or absorb their exact trajectory. Part II extends this radical lens across the fundamental fault lines of human experience: relationships, race, geopolitics, physical embodiment, and the outer boundaries of species existence.                        The underlying principle remains absolute: we do not take our intact "I" into another person's reality. The reality reshapes, overwrites, or breaks the "I." Relational Systems: The Model Partner vs. The Toxic Household We routinely look at fractured marriages...
Post a Comment
Continue reading »

Names, Visions, and Imageries of the Crow tribe of Native Americans

iPost Team,
Table of Contents The Crow: Who are they? Names, Visions, and Imageries Apsaalooke (or Absaroka) The Separations of the Bands The Mountain Crow (Ashalaho) The River Crow The Kicked in the Bellies Chiefs, Their Names and Meanings Chief Long Hair (Issheuhutskitu) Chief Sore Belly (Arapoosh) Chief of the Camp (Ashbacheeitche) Chief of Plenty Coups The rich cultural heritage of the Native Americans is subject to different interpretations beyond the actual meanings as understood by the natives. The Crow tribe’s names, visions, and imageries are not spared from these relative interpretations. It is claimed that these names, visions, and imageries denote exaggerations, triumphalism, or cultural symbolism. Also, their name can visually reveal the true meanings of descriptive language and metaphors or similes in words and expressions.   The objective of this writing is to examine these names and imageries to differentiate the Europeans’ interpretations of the names and lifestyle of the Cr...
Post a Comment
Continue reading »

Accessibility: from Philosophical Perspectives

iPost Team,
Introduction This article aims to examine the concept of accessibility from some philosophical principles: Utilitarianism and the principle of ‘one and many.’ Doing this will bring to the fore the reason why accessibility is the cynosure of inclusivity. Understanding Accessibility Accessibility refers to the design of products, devices, services, or environments that are usable for everyone. It ensures that everyone, regardless of their abilities or limitations, can effectively interact with and benefit from a product, technology, environment, or service. The term ‘accessibility’ has its origin in French. It can be said to be borrowed from the French “ accessibilite ,” meaning “the quality of being able to be reached or accessed.” This French term might have been influenced by the late Latin accessibilis , from Latin accessus (past participle of accēdere , meaning “to approach”, “to enter”, “to access”, or “to log in.” According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, the ...
Post a Comment
Continue reading »