First Week of Advent – Kings’ misinterpretation of His Coming

Not everyone was thrilled at the news of the birth of Jesus. Many were worried about the news of his birth. King Herod was unhappy with the news that a new king was coming to take over what he considered his own. He was furious and premeditatively unleashed a massive execution of infants to ensure that the newborn King was killed. That was how he understood the birth of Jesus, a King coming to take his place.

If Herod interpreted his birth as that, imagine what it meant to hundreds of women who lost their children at the hands of Herod. The angels shout 'Glory to God in the highest heaven and on earth peace among those whom he favours!' How much peace did those women know when their children were brutally murdered by Herod?

Ironically, the Wise men from the east considered the newborn child as king and brought gold, frankincense and myrrh. Unbeknownst to them, one of their gifts, myrrh would be used first in the burial of the children murdered by Herod. His coming brought peace, joy and hope to many. I wondered what the reactions of those women or families would be, who lost their beautiful children. The prophet Jeremiah stated the conditions of those women:

A voice was heard in Ramah, wailing and loud lamentation, Rachel weeping for her children; she refused to be consoled, because they are no more.

His peace is still with all he favours. Some will begin to ask: Has God favourites? What makes one his favourite? How can anyone be his favourite? Does God choose and pick among his creatures? Were those children killed by Herod not his favourites? If those children, innocent as they, were not his favourites, who else is qualified to be his favoured one?

To attempt some answers: We can say that Mary earned God's favour. Elizabeth too was favoured by God. This was before the birth of Jesus. At his birth, the shepherds, the wise men from the east and other unsung people (including the holy innocents) were favoured by the king. In his lifetime, many favourites will be made and many more will merit it. The massacre of the innocents at his birth is reversed when he was leaving this world. Through his death, many are drawn to him. The many are you and I: The Mary Magdalene, Zacchaeus, the thieves, the sinners, all the good and bad people of this world. He draws all to himself. On this first week of Advent, let us think and imagine how the commemoration of his birth will affect (me, you, us), the people around (me, you, us), (our, my, your) community, and the world in general.

Comments

Who’s A Rebel? Camus’ The Rebel and the NigeriaSphere

In the contemporary Nigerian landscape, the word "rebel" is often weaponized by those in power. To the state, a rebel is a transgressor of the Cybercrimes Act, a "disturber of the peace," or an agent of destabilization. However, if we look through the eyes of Albert Camus, the 20th-century philosopher of the absurd, we find a different definition; one that validates the citizen’s cry for good governance not as an act of subversion, but as an act of profound affirmation. The Camusian "No": An Act of "Yes" Camus begins his treatise with a startlingly simple observation: "What is a rebel? A man who says no." But this "no" is not a denial of order. When a Nigerian citizen takes to social media to demand transparency or decry the absence of the rule of law, they are saying "no" to a specific limit that has been breached. Camus argues that in saying no, the rebel is simultaneously saying "yes" to the existen...

The Self-Alternating Theory: Why We Can Never Truly Be the Other

We live in a culture obsessed with the exercise of perspective-taking. We tell ourselves to "walk a mile in another person’s shoes," if our core self: our moral compass, our intellectual agility, our refined tastes, and our personal ethics remains intact during the journey. We imagine slipping into the lives of others like costume changes in a play: maintaining our internal "I" while operating the external machinery of someone else's life. The Self-Alternating Theory challenges this fundamental illusion. It posits a sobering premise: you cannot be the other, whether in their best or worst selves. If you were truly transplanted into another person’s existence: inheriting their exact neurobiology, trauma, muscle memory, history, and social incentives you would not reform their life from an enlightened, outside perspective. You would either collapse under the weight of an alien context or become the very thing you previously judged, admired, or misunderstood. ...

The Self-Alternating Theory (Part II): The Fractured Mirror of Context

In the first iteration of the Self-Alternating Theory, we dismantled the illusion of portable identity. We demonstrated that if you were transplanted into the life of a failed leader, a sex worker, a saint, or an elite athlete, you would not reform or master their world from an enlightened external perspective. You would either crumble under the weight of an alien context or absorb their exact trajectory. Part II extends this radical lens across the fundamental fault lines of human experience: relationships, race, geopolitics, physical embodiment, and the outer boundaries of species existence. The underlying principle remains absolute: we do not take our intact "I" into another person's reality. The reality reshapes, overwrites, or breaks the "I." Relational Systems: The Model Partner vs. The Toxic Household We routinely look at fractured marriages...

Names, Visions, and Imageries of the Crow tribe of Native Americans

Table of Contents The Crow: Who are they? Names, Visions, and Imageries Apsaalooke (or Absaroka) The Separations of the Bands The Mountain Crow (Ashalaho) The River Crow The Kicked in the Bellies Chiefs, Their Names and Meanings Chief Long Hair (Issheuhutskitu) Chief Sore Belly (Arapoosh) Chief of the Camp (Ashbacheeitche) Chief of Plenty Coups The rich cultural heritage of the Native Americans is subject to different interpretations beyond the actual meanings as understood by the natives. The Crow tribe’s names, visions, and imageries are not spared from these relative interpretations. It is claimed that these names, visions, and imageries denote exaggerations, triumphalism, or cultural symbolism. Also, their name can visually reveal the true meanings of descriptive language and metaphors or similes in words and expressions. The objective of this writing is to examine these names and imageries to differentiate the Europeans’ interpretations of the names and lifestyle of the Cr...

Accessibility: from Philosophical Perspectives

Introduction This article aims to examine the concept of accessibility from some philosophical principles: Utilitarianism and the principle of ‘one and many.’ Doing this will bring to the fore the reason why accessibility is the cynosure of inclusivity. Understanding Accessibility Accessibility refers to the design of products, devices, services, or environments that are usable for everyone. It ensures that everyone, regardless of their abilities or limitations, can effectively interact with and benefit from a product, technology, environment, or service. The term ‘accessibility’ has its origin in French. It can be said to be borrowed from the French “ accessibilite ,” meaning “the quality of being able to be reached or accessed.” This French term might have been influenced by the late Latin accessibilis , from Latin accessus (past participle of accēdere , meaning “to approach”, “to enter”, “to access”, or “to log in.” According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, the ...

iPostThisWeek

Search This Blog