Skip to main content

A Christian Adventurer in Advent

Every year we anticipate, expect, and approach the four weeks before Christmas with the wholeness of memory that is past, experience that is in the present, and a hope that looks to the future.

Advent comes every year. Is it taken for granted? I do not think so. Like every other thing that happens once a year, it is expected, imagined, and welcomed. A typical example is a birthday. When your birthday comes, it is a day you remember and celebrate no matter how big or small the celebration is. It is momentous and symbolic. You cast your mind back to the birthdays of yesteryears, compare the previous with the now, and perhaps, imagine what the future birthday will be like.

Advent stands for the coming of something or someone important. In Christian tradition, it is the expectation and preparation for the Second Coming of Christ. It is also a time for dedicated prayers and spiritual preparations for the celebration of the birth of Christ at Christmas. In Western Christianity, it marks the beginning of the liturgical year. 

Why do we have to expect, wait, and anticipate during Advent? It is all about the future. We do not wait for the past. It is gone. We do not expect it in the present. It is now. We expect someone or thing to be, to come, or to happen. It is all about the future. Advent cannot be in the past or present. We cannot live in the future now. We have left the past. We are in the present.

Writing about being in the present, imagine how you have changed since your last birthday. For better or for worse? You can separate your past from your now:

  • You have a new partner or lost one.
  • You have a baby or lost a dear one.
  • You gained weight, or you lost weight.
  • You have a new job, or you lost one.
  • You are a Christian, or you cease to be one.
  • You moved home, or you remain where you are.
  • You found love, or you resent everyone.

All you do is always in the present. From the present, you get to the future. From the known, you get to the unknown. You cannot get to the unknown from the unknown. This can never be realized. Nor can you get from the known to the known. This does not require any progression. The present is constant. It is stationary. The known does not change. Any changes are contained in the present. The known has no future; it is not in anticipation. The unknown is predictive. It is precarious. It is uncertain. It is full of risks.

Advent tells us about the future, the unknown, and the uncertain. It is uncertain in the sense that you, the adventurer is the candidate for uncertainty. Not Christmas or Christ’s Second Coming. Christmas is certain. Christ’s Second Coming is certain in the eyes of faith but you as an individual have not got the surety of seeing the Parousia. The risk associated with Advent is with the adventurer, the Christian adventurer.

Etymologically, Parousia means ‘being present’ but technically, it means for the Christians ‘the Second Coming.’ Aspiring for the future and hoping to see the Second Coming of Christ, your spiritual forecast may be exposed to some risks. It is a kind of spiritual risk. Who do you give your soul to? God or Mammon? It is a risk; if you give it to God then you must follow him all the way. If you give it to Mammon, then you cut ties with God. The irony of it all is that it is in the present that you decide whom to give your soul to before you can realize the happiness of the future. Your soul is given in the present, not in the past or the future. Parousia begins in the present from the known.  

So, Advent is a continuous reminder that we can only decide now about what we expect or anticipate in the future. We can wait for it in the present, not in the past. The past is gone, the future is far, but the present is here. To a Christian adventurer, Advent is the known unknown. Therefore, put your house together in faith, settle your spiritual debts, dust your cupboards of hateful mites, clear your soul of webs of envious thoughts, open your doors of goodwill, and sprinkle the shower of love. 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NigeriaSphere: A Definition!

At its core, NigeriaSphere is the collective resonance of the Nigerian identity, transcending geography, ethnicity, and time. It is the "Kpim" (to borrow the popular concept of Pantaleon Iroegbu) , the ontological heartbeat of a people whose spirit is no longer confined to a landmass but exists wherever the Nigerian consciousness interacts with the world. The Ontological Framework NigeriaSphere operates as a dual philosophical process: Terminus ad Quo (The Point of Origin): It represents the shared history, the "Nigerian condition," and the cultural bedrock from which every citizen and diaspora member emerges. It is the ancestral "why." Terminus ad Quem (The Point of Destination): It is the aspirational goal of nationhood. It is the destination where the Nigerian identity is refined into a standard of excellence, equity, and peace. In this sense, NigeriaSphere is not a static place, but a kinetic journey toward...

Trinity and Tawhid – The Same or Unique?

Table of Contents God/god Explained Same or Unique? Trinity and Tawhid: Synonyms and Polysemy Conclusion The concept of monotheism is the belief that there is only one God. It is a concept of theism that specifies itself as distinct from other theisms, such as polytheism, ditheism, or tritheism. The concept of monotheism is distinctive and accepts indivisibility while maintaining the uniqueness of God. The question that comes to mind is: who is this God? What about Him? The Christians, with a few exceptions, agree that “there are three persons in one God, God the Father, God, the Son and God, the Holy Spirit.” Therefore, Christians profess that God is a Trinity, which is the focal point of the Christian concept of monotheism. When compared to Islam, it is completely a different understanding. For Muslims, “there is no god but God, and Muhammad is the prophet of God.” This is normally put in this way: “ašhadu ʾan lā ʾilāha ʾilla -llāhu, wa-ʾašhadu ʾanna muḥammadan rasūlu -llāh,” that i...

Who’s A Rebel? Camus’ The Rebel and the NigeriaSphere

In the contemporary Nigerian landscape, the word "rebel" is often weaponized by those in power. To the state, a rebel is a transgressor of the Cybercrimes Act, a "disturber of the peace," or an agent of destabilization. However, if we look through the eyes of Albert Camus, the 20th-century philosopher of the absurd, we find a different definition; one that validates the citizen’s cry for good governance not as an act of subversion, but as an act of profound affirmation. The Camusian "No": An Act of "Yes" Camus begins his treatise with a startlingly simple observation: "What is a rebel? A man who says no." But this "no" is not a denial of order. When a Nigerian citizen takes to social media to demand transparency or decry the absence of the rule of law, they are saying "no" to a specific limit that has been breached. Camus argues that in saying no, the rebel is simultaneously saying "yes" to the existen...

Same-Sex Marriage in Igbo Cultural Traditions

Table of Contents The Igbo Tribe Same-Sex Marriage – Definition & Brief History Same-Sex Marriage in Igbo Cultural Traditions Conclusion This writing claims that same-sex marriage in Igbo culture is necessary, an improvisation, and a  ‘like with like’  construal. By construal, it places Igbo same-sex marriage in a social psychological context and views an individual as finding out ways or means to understand and interpret his-her surroundings, and the behaviour and actions of the people around and towards him-her. The reason for this claim is not far-fetched. The Igbo Tribe The Igbo is a major ethnic group in Nigeria with an estimated population of about 32 million. It is one of the largest in Africa adding to 18% of the total 177 million people of Nigeria. Igbo land consists of Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu, and Imo states of Nigeria. However, Igbos can be found in these other states of Nigeria: Rivers, Delta, Akwa Ibom, and Cross River. Outside of Nigeria, the Igbo tribe ...

How the Christians perceived Islam, Prophet Muhammad and Muslims from the 8th to the 15th Centuries – Part 1

Introduction The early and medieval Christians have no theological or legal (in terms of biblical) perspectives in their perceptions of Islam, Prophet Muhammad and Muslims. Contrary to the Qur’an and Muslims who theologically, and legally perceived Christians and Christianity perhaps because of Christianity’s antecedents. Islam theologically presented a series of quandaries to early and medieval Christianity, such that some of them viewed Muslim's as pagans and some as heretics or schismatics. The Christian polemicists hardly used the term Islam or Muslim to identify their rivalry, instead, the preferences to terms such as ‘Saracens, Hagarenes, Arabs, Turks, Pagans, Moors or simply, those who follow the Law of Muhammad’ were prevalent. This writing aims to examine by typologies, the polemics of Christians that cover from the 8th century to the 15th century and discussing Christianity's arguments from the perspectives of:   St. John Damascene (675-753) Heresy and Heresia...