Skip to main content

A Christian Adventurer in Advent

Image
iPost Team,

Every year we anticipate, expect, and approach the four weeks before Christmas with the wholeness of memory that is past, experience that is in the present, and a hope that looks to the future.

Advent comes every year. Is it taken for granted? I do not think so. Like every other thing that happens once a year, it is expected, imagined, and welcomed. A typical example is a birthday. When your birthday comes, it is a day you remember and celebrate no matter how big or small the celebration is. It is momentous and symbolic. You cast your mind back to the birthdays of yesteryears, compare the previous with the now, and perhaps, imagine what the future birthday will be like.

Advent stands for the coming of something or someone important. In Christian tradition, it is the expectation and preparation for the Second Coming of Christ. It is also a time for dedicated prayers and spiritual preparations for the celebration of the birth of Christ at Christmas. In Western Christianity, it marks the beginning of the liturgical year. 

Why do we have to expect, wait, and anticipate during Advent? It is all about the future. We do not wait for the past. It is gone. We do not expect it in the present. It is now. We expect someone or thing to be, to come, or to happen. It is all about the future. Advent cannot be in the past or present. We cannot live in the future now. We have left the past. We are in the present.

Writing about being in the present, imagine how you have changed since your last birthday. For better or for worse? You can separate your past from your now:

  • You have a new partner or lost one.
  • You have a baby or lost a dear one.
  • You gained weight, or you lost weight.
  • You have a new job, or you lost one.
  • You are a Christian, or you cease to be one.
  • You moved home, or you remain where you are.
  • You found love, or you resent everyone.

All you do is always in the present. From the present, you get to the future. From the known, you get to the unknown. You cannot get to the unknown from the unknown. This can never be realized. Nor can you get from the known to the known. This does not require any progression. The present is constant. It is stationary. The known does not change. Any changes are contained in the present. The known has no future; it is not in anticipation. The unknown is predictive. It is precarious. It is uncertain. It is full of risks.

Advent tells us about the future, the unknown, and the uncertain. It is uncertain in the sense that you, the adventurer is the candidate for uncertainty. Not Christmas or Christ’s Second Coming. Christmas is certain. Christ’s Second Coming is certain in the eyes of faith but you as an individual have not got the surety of seeing the Parousia. The risk associated with Advent is with the adventurer, the Christian adventurer.

Etymologically, Parousia means ‘being present’ but technically, it means for the Christians ‘the Second Coming.’ Aspiring for the future and hoping to see the Second Coming of Christ, your spiritual forecast may be exposed to some risks. It is a kind of spiritual risk. Who do you give your soul to? God or Mammon? It is a risk; if you give it to God then you must follow him all the way. If you give it to Mammon, then you cut ties with God. The irony of it all is that it is in the present that you decide whom to give your soul to before you can realize the happiness of the future. Your soul is given in the present, not in the past or the future. Parousia begins in the present from the known.  

So, Advent is a continuous reminder that we can only decide now about what we expect or anticipate in the future. We can wait for it in the present, not in the past. The past is gone, the future is far, but the present is here. To a Christian adventurer, Advent is the known unknown. Therefore, put your house together in faith, settle your spiritual debts, dust your cupboards of hateful mites, clear your soul of webs of envious thoughts, open your doors of goodwill, and sprinkle the shower of love. 

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: Power, Decay, and the Price of "My Turn"

iPost Team,
Title: Emilokon or The Fable of the Termites Author: Joe Barnabas Genre: Political Satire / Literary Allegory In his latest work, Joe Barnabas delivers a biting, visceral exploration of a society in the throes of transformation, and perhaps, disintegration. Emilokon or The Fable of the Termites is not merely a story; it is a mirror held up to the face of modern leadership and the systemic "termites" that hollow out the foundations of our shared home. The Heart of the Fable The title itself, Emilokon , carries the weight of entitlement and historical destiny, while the subtitle provides the darker metaphor. Barnabas masterfully utilizes the image of the termite: a creature that consumes from the inside out, often unnoticed until the structure collapses. This serves as a hauntingly familiar representation of the creeping greed and administrative decay currently plaguing our world. Structure and Pace Spanning 36 meticulously crafted chapters, the book feels lik...
1 comment
Continue reading »

The Self-Alternating Theory (Part II): The Fractured Mirror of Context

iPost Team,
In the first iteration of the Self-Alternating Theory, we dismantled the illusion of portable identity. We demonstrated that if you were transplanted into the life of a failed leader, a sex worker, a saint, or an elite athlete, you would not reform or master their world from an enlightened external perspective. You would either crumble under the weight of an alien context or absorb their exact trajectory. Part II extends this radical lens across the fundamental fault lines of human experience: relationships, race, geopolitics, physical embodiment, and the outer boundaries of species existence.                        The underlying principle remains absolute: we do not take our intact "I" into another person's reality. The reality reshapes, overwrites, or breaks the "I." Relational Systems: The Model Partner vs. The Toxic Household We routinely look at fractured marriages...
Post a Comment
Continue reading »

The Self-Alternating Theory: Why We Can Never Truly Be the Other

iPost Team,
We live in a culture obsessed with the exercise of perspective-taking. We tell ourselves to "walk a mile in another person’s shoes," if our core self: our moral compass, our intellectual agility, our refined tastes, and our personal ethics remains intact during the journey. We imagine slipping into the lives of others like costume changes in a play: maintaining our internal "I" while operating the external machinery of someone else's life. The Self-Alternating Theory challenges this fundamental illusion. It posits a sobering premise: you cannot be the other, whether in their best or worst selves. If you were truly transplanted into another person’s existence: inheriting their exact neurobiology, trauma, muscle memory, history, and social incentives you would not reform their life from an enlightened, outside perspective. You would either collapse under the weight of an alien context or become the very thing you previously judged, admired, or misunderstood. ...
Post a Comment
Continue reading »

Who’s A Rebel? Camus’ The Rebel and the NigeriaSphere

iPost Team,
In the contemporary Nigerian landscape, the word "rebel" is often weaponized by those in power. To the state, a rebel is a transgressor of the Cybercrimes Act, a "disturber of the peace," or an agent of destabilization. However, if we look through the eyes of Albert Camus, the 20th-century philosopher of the absurd, we find a different definition; one that validates the citizen’s cry for good governance not as an act of subversion, but as an act of profound affirmation. The Camusian "No": An Act of "Yes" Camus begins his treatise with a startlingly simple observation: "What is a rebel? A man who says no." But this "no" is not a denial of order. When a Nigerian citizen takes to social media to demand transparency or decry the absence of the rule of law, they are saying "no" to a specific limit that has been breached. Camus argues that in saying no, the rebel is simultaneously saying "yes" to the existen...
Post a Comment
Continue reading »

Accessibility: from Philosophical Perspectives

iPost Team,
Introduction This article aims to examine the concept of accessibility from some philosophical principles: Utilitarianism and the principle of ‘one and many.’ Doing this will bring to the fore the reason why accessibility is the cynosure of inclusivity. Understanding Accessibility Accessibility refers to the design of products, devices, services, or environments that are usable for everyone. It ensures that everyone, regardless of their abilities or limitations, can effectively interact with and benefit from a product, technology, environment, or service. The term ‘accessibility’ has its origin in French. It can be said to be borrowed from the French “ accessibilite ,” meaning “the quality of being able to be reached or accessed.” This French term might have been influenced by the late Latin accessibilis , from Latin accessus (past participle of accēdere , meaning “to approach”, “to enter”, “to access”, or “to log in.” According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, the ...
Post a Comment
Continue reading »