Skip to main content

Alan Paton’s 3 Freedom Narratives and the Hypocrisies of Supremacy Laws


Table of Contents

Alan Stewart Paton was born on January 11, 1903, in Pietermaritzburg, Natal, South Africa. He was married to Dorrie Francis Lusted from 1928-1967. He attended the University of Natal and Maritzburg College.

Alan visited Norway and developed his ideas about his first novel Cry, the Beloved Country which was completed while in San Francisco in 1946. His debut novel, Cry, the Beloved Country was published in 1948 and became famous as a result of that.

Cry, the Beloved Country tells a story of racial injustice and profiling in the then apartheid South Africa. The novel later became the Liberal Party’s manifesto in 1953 of which Alan was a founding vice president. The party fought against the apartheid laws legislated by the National Party government. In 1949 Alan Paton received Anisfield-Wolf Book Awards. 

Alan’s first novel, Cry, the Beloved Country, his second, Too Late the Phalarope and his third, Ah, but Your Land is Beautiful will be viewed as his three freedom narratives as well as his contempt for apartheid and the hypocrisies of supremacy laws in then South Africa.

Cry, the Beloved Country

It tells tales of groups’ protests because of the way their society was structured, and people were profiled because of their colour. That put a great divide between white and black people in South Africa. Cry, the Beloved Country was not only a gripping narrative of the situation of events, but it was also a strong literary protest of systemic injustices (social, racial, tribal) on both sides, that is white and black peoples alike. For Paton, the black people of South Africa were affected by the community and moral displacements resulting from the diminishing tribal structures, and the white people were overwhelmed by ‘native crimes.’ 

The characters in the novel portray the impressions and lived experiences of Paton in Cry, the Beloved Country. For example, the character of The Girl (Absalom’s wife). She was depicted as a teenager, about 16 years old. According to Paton, the girl claimed that at 16 years old, Absalom was her third husband. Though we do not know the timeline of the marriages to the previous husbands, we can conjecture that perhaps, a year might be the interval between each husband.

Absalom was characterized as the son of a preacher (a priest), who went in search of his aunt, Gertrude in Johannesburg. Absalom later murdered Arthur Jarvis, who was the son of James Jarvis, a wealthy landowner.

Gertrude, the preacher’s sister was a prostitute in Johannesburg. Not minding his position as a preacher, Stephen went in search of his sister, Gertrude and son, Absalom in Johannesburg. 

Too Late the Phalarope

Too Late the Phalarope is the second novel by Alan Paton and was published in 1953. The title of the novel is connected to the bird known as the phalarope.

The phalaropes are shore birds found in Africa, Asia, the Americas, and Europe, which means the birds are virtually on every continent. The birds are notable for their special feeding method and nesting behaviour. A phalarope belongs to any of the three living species of slender-necked shorebirds of the bird family known as Scolopacidae.

In terms of reproduction, these birds practised what has been called sexual dimorphism. We know that ‘dimorphism’ is the existence of two different formations or appearances of a species in the same population. Then sexual morphism could be viewed as the existence of something in two different forms or appearances. The phalaropes are noted for their polyandrous behaviours, where one female has multiple male mates and vice versa.

We can imagine the reason Paton added the bird, the phalarope as part of the title of his second novel.  

Too Late the Phalarope tells the tale of an Afrikaner, Pieter van Vlaanderen, a South African police officer at crossroads between his convictions about the immorality of the apartheid laws and upholding the office as a man-of-order in South African society. In this story, Paton carried his campaign against apartheid to the law and its enforcement, to morality and norms, and to white supremacy in South Africa.  

The novel highlights the efficacy and ignominy of the ‘Immorality Act of 1927.’ The Act prohibits relationships between black and white people. Among the salient points of the novel was when Smith (a white man) slept with a black maid and she became pregnant. Because of shame and fear of breaking the ‘Immorality Act,’ Smith killed his maid and dismembered her body to hide the evidence.

The police officer himself, Pieter fell in love with a black woman, Stephanie, and had numerous sexual intercourse with her while at the same time upholding the ‘Immorality Act.’ At that point, Paton painted pictures of hypocrisies, the ignominy of the law, and the “phalarope complex.” Presumably, the ‘Immorality Act’ was meant to prevent black South Africans from meeting with white South Africans. Eventually, it was the white South Africans who sought out black South African women for sex.

Ah, but Your Land is Beautiful

Paton’s third novel, Ah, but Your Land is Beautiful was published in 1983. The work is a mix of life events and imagined circumstances. It consists of six sections.

Paton paints a picture of violent conflicts, ire, and seething bitterness between black, white, Indian, and mixed-race peoples.

Section one is about the Defiance Campaign in 1952 which was significant because of the action of an Indian youngster, Prem Bodasingh, who used the Durban Municipal Reference Library reserved for white people. She continually used the library and urged others to do the same as a way of protesting the apartheid laws. One could argue that this teenager’s action in 1952 might have influenced Rosa Parks in the USA. Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat to a white man on a Montgomery, Alabama bus in 1955. 

In section two, Paton reveals the predicaments of those who resent the apartheid regimes and laws. 

The ruling apartheid Nationalist government enforced apartheid laws and defaulters were penalized by loss of jobs and other benefits.

Paton, in section three, brings to the fore the tensions between the progenitors of Dutch colonists and English-speaking colonists and argues that it was the reason for the Boer War of the mid-19th century. He also pinpoints the apartheid as a point of divergence between the Anglican Church and the Afrikaner’s Calvinism (who were in support of apartheid).

In section four, Paton tells the influence and popularity of an Afrikaner, Jan Woldemade Fischer, a politician, and religious leader. As a part of the justice system, he trumpeted the apartheid system and was liked by the learned community as well as politicians and church leaders.

Nevertheless, he was brought down by a black South African whom he had an affair with thereby breaking the ‘Immorality Acts.’ He was convicted and sentenced to death. But he beat the system by committing suicide.

Section five is the point Paton commends the good works and life of those who remained docile, humane, and charitable, notwithstanding the apartheid laws. At the same time, he brings to light many crimes perpetrated by all concerned in South African societies.

In the final section, Paton sheds light on the political changes happening in South Africa. A vision for a better South Africa, that is peaceful, beautiful, and bright. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who’s A Rebel? Camus’ The Rebel and the NigeriaSphere

In the contemporary Nigerian landscape, the word "rebel" is often weaponized by those in power. To the state, a rebel is a transgressor of the Cybercrimes Act, a "disturber of the peace," or an agent of destabilization. However, if we look through the eyes of Albert Camus, the 20th-century philosopher of the absurd, we find a different definition; one that validates the citizen’s cry for good governance not as an act of subversion, but as an act of profound affirmation. The Camusian "No": An Act of "Yes" Camus begins his treatise with a startlingly simple observation: "What is a rebel? A man who says no." But this "no" is not a denial of order. When a Nigerian citizen takes to social media to demand transparency or decry the absence of the rule of law, they are saying "no" to a specific limit that has been breached. Camus argues that in saying no, the rebel is simultaneously saying "yes" to the existen...

The Self-Alternating Theory: Why We Can Never Truly Be the Other

We live in a culture obsessed with the exercise of perspective-taking. We tell ourselves to "walk a mile in another person’s shoes," if our core self: our moral compass, our intellectual agility, our refined tastes, and our personal ethics remains intact during the journey. We imagine slipping into the lives of others like costume changes in a play: maintaining our internal "I" while operating the external machinery of someone else's life. The Self-Alternating Theory challenges this fundamental illusion. It posits a sobering premise: you cannot be the other, whether in their best or worst selves. If you were truly transplanted into another person’s existence: inheriting their exact neurobiology, trauma, muscle memory, history, and social incentives you would not reform their life from an enlightened, outside perspective. You would either collapse under the weight of an alien context or become the very thing you previously judged, admired, or misunderstood. ...

The Self-Alternating Theory (Part II): The Fractured Mirror of Context

In the first iteration of the Self-Alternating Theory, we dismantled the illusion of portable identity. We demonstrated that if you were transplanted into the life of a failed leader, a sex worker, a saint, or an elite athlete, you would not reform or master their world from an enlightened external perspective. You would either crumble under the weight of an alien context or absorb their exact trajectory. Part II extends this radical lens across the fundamental fault lines of human experience: relationships, race, geopolitics, physical embodiment, and the outer boundaries of species existence.                        The underlying principle remains absolute: we do not take our intact "I" into another person's reality. The reality reshapes, overwrites, or breaks the "I." Relational Systems: The Model Partner vs. The Toxic Household We routinely look at fractured marriages...

Names, Visions, and Imageries of the Crow tribe of Native Americans

Table of Contents The Crow: Who are they? Names, Visions, and Imageries Apsaalooke (or Absaroka) The Separations of the Bands The Mountain Crow (Ashalaho) The River Crow The Kicked in the Bellies Chiefs, Their Names and Meanings Chief Long Hair (Issheuhutskitu) Chief Sore Belly (Arapoosh) Chief of the Camp (Ashbacheeitche) Chief of Plenty Coups The rich cultural heritage of the Native Americans is subject to different interpretations beyond the actual meanings as understood by the natives. The Crow tribe’s names, visions, and imageries are not spared from these relative interpretations. It is claimed that these names, visions, and imageries denote exaggerations, triumphalism, or cultural symbolism. Also, their name can visually reveal the true meanings of descriptive language and metaphors or similes in words and expressions.   The objective of this writing is to examine these names and imageries to differentiate the Europeans’ interpretations of the names and lifestyle of the Cr...

Accessibility: from Philosophical Perspectives

Introduction This article aims to examine the concept of accessibility from some philosophical principles: Utilitarianism and the principle of ‘one and many.’ Doing this will bring to the fore the reason why accessibility is the cynosure of inclusivity. Understanding Accessibility Accessibility refers to the design of products, devices, services, or environments that are usable for everyone. It ensures that everyone, regardless of their abilities or limitations, can effectively interact with and benefit from a product, technology, environment, or service. The term ‘accessibility’ has its origin in French. It can be said to be borrowed from the French “ accessibilite ,” meaning “the quality of being able to be reached or accessed.” This French term might have been influenced by the late Latin accessibilis , from Latin accessus (past participle of accēdere , meaning “to approach”, “to enter”, “to access”, or “to log in.” According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, the ...